A computed tomographic, mixed dentition, space analysis comparison

1. Butt S, Chaudhry S, Javed M, Wahid A, Ehsan A, Malik S, Khan AA. Mixed dentition space analysis: a review. Pak Oral Dent J 2012;32:502-7.Search in Google Scholar

2. Galvão M, Dominguez GC, Tormin ST, Akamine A, Tortamano A, de Fantini SM. Applicability of Moyers analysis in mixed dentition: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:100-5.10.1590/S2176-94512013000600015Search in Google Scholar

3. Luu NS, Mandich MA, Tieu LD, Kaipatur N, Flores-Mir C. The validity and reliability of mixed-dentition analysis methods: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:1143-53.10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0083Search in Google Scholar

4. de Paula S, Almeida MA, Lee PC. Prediction of mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45 degrees cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:309-14.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70147-8Search in Google Scholar

5. Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;88:798-801.10.14219/jada.archive.1974.0158Search in Google Scholar

6. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orhodontics. Chicago: YearBook Medical Publishers, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

7. Buwembo W, Luboga S. Moyer’s method of mixed dentition analysis: a meta-analysis. Afr Health Sci 2004;4:63-6.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:24-34.10.1259/dmfr/12615645361146521159912Search in Google Scholar

9. Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:19-25; discussion 25-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.01619577143Search in Google Scholar

10. Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:17 e1-9; discussion 17-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.02119577142Search in Google Scholar

11. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e107-14.10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.02021889058Search in Google Scholar

12. Moshfeghi M, Tavakoli MA, Hosseini ET, Hosseini AT, Hosseini IT. Analysis of linear measurement accuracy obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom VG). Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9(Suppl 1):S57-62.Search in Google Scholar

13. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:80-93.10.1259/dmfr/3134999418239035Search in Google Scholar

14. Dalessandri D, Bracco P, Paganelli C, Hernandez Soler V, Martin C. Ex vivo measurement reliability using two different cbct scanners for orthodontic purposes. Int J Med Robot 2012;8:230-42.10.1002/rcs.45822315209Search in Google Scholar

15. Sakabe J, Kuroki Y, Fujimaki S, Nakajima I, Honda K. Reproducibility and accuracy of measuring unerupted teeth using limited cone beam X-ray CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:2-6.10.1259/dmfr/65418489Search in Google Scholar

16. Nguyen E, Boychuk D, Orellana M. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in predicting the diameter of unerupted teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e59-66.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.017Search in Google Scholar

17. Luís R, Alves S, Vale F, Lavado N. Preditive methods on mixed dentition analysis – Validation on the Portuguese population. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac 2013;54:185-90.Search in Google Scholar

18. Jensen E, Kai-Jen Yen P, Moorrees CF, Thomsen SO. Mesiodistal crown diameters of the deciduous and permanent teeth in individuals. J Dent Res 1957;36:39-47.10.1177/00220345570360011501Search in Google Scholar

19. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68.10.2307/2532051Search in Google Scholar

20. Lin LI. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 2000;56:324-5.Search in Google Scholar

21. Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:293-9.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70300-2Search in Google Scholar

22. Flores-Mir C, Bernabé E, Camus C, Carhuayo MA, Major PW. Prediction of mesiodistal canine and premolar tooth width in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:173-6.10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.03251.x12962200Search in Google Scholar

23. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. [corrected]. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116:238-57.10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.00223849378Search in Google Scholar

24. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Conebeam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:640 e1-5.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.01918456133Search in Google Scholar