Fresh stirrings among statisticians: statistical commentary

1. Trafimow D, Marks M. Editorial, Basic Applied Soc Psychol 2015;37:1-2.Search in Google Scholar

2. Berkson J. Tests of significance considered as evidence. J Am Statist Assoc 1942;37:325-35.10.1080/01621459.1942.10501760Search in Google Scholar

3. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Statistician. 2016. <http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108>10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108Search in Google Scholar

4. American Statistical Association releases statement on statistical significance and P-values, media release, American Statistical Association, 2016. <https://www.amstat.org/newsroom/pressreleases/P-ValueStatement.pdf>Search in Google Scholar

5. Baker M. Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values. Nature 2016;531:151.10.1038/nature.2016.1950326961635Search in Google Scholar

6. Nuzzo RL. Scientific method: Statistical errors. Nature 214;506:150-2.10.1038/506150a24522584Search in Google Scholar

7. Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M. Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012;7:615-31.10.1177/174569161245905826168121Search in Google Scholar

8. PRISMA Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and metaanalyses. <http://www.prisma-statement.org/>.Search in Google Scholar

9. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;349:g7647.10.1136/bmj.g764725555855Search in Google Scholar

10. Bland M. Meta-analysis: methods for quantitative data synthesis. University of York, 2006, https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/ msc/systrev/week6/meta_text.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

11. Donatelli RE, Lee SJ. How to report reliability in orthodontic research: Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:156-61.10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.01423810057Search in Google Scholar

12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.Search in Google Scholar

13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:85-93.10.1002/uog.12212858311Search in Google Scholar

14. Johnson VE. Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:19313-7.10.1073/pnas.1313476110384514024218581Search in Google Scholar

15. Haller H, Krauss S. Misinterpretations of significance: A problem students share with their teachers? Methods Psychol Res Online 2002;7:1-20.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lecoutre M-P, Poitevineau J, Lecoutre B. Even statisticians are not immune to misinterpretations of Null Hypothesis Significance Tests. Int J Psychol 2003;38:37-45.10.1080/00207590244000250Search in Google Scholar

17. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P value fallacy. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:995-1004.10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-0000810383371Search in Google Scholar

18. Svensson E. Important considerations for the optimal communication between statisticians and medical researchers in consulting, teaching and collaborative research, with a focus on the analysis of ordered categorical data. In: Batanero C, ed. Training researchers in the use of statistics, IASE Round table Conference, Tokyo 2000. International Association for Statistical Education, 2001:23-36.10.52041/SRAP.00101Search in Google Scholar

19. Cumming G. The problem with p values: how significant are they, really? The Conversation, November 12 2013, <http://theconversation.com/the-problem-with-p-values-how-significant-are-they-really-20029>.Search in Google Scholar

20. Fisher RA. The design of experiments, 8th edn. New York: Hafner Publishing Co. 1971.Search in Google Scholar

21. Fisher RA. Statistical methods and scientific induction. J Royal Stat Soc Series B (Methodology) 1955;17:69-78.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1955.tb00180.xSearch in Google Scholar