This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Elghazouli, A. Y., Castro, J. M., & Izzuddin, B. A. (2008). Seismic performance of composite moment-resisting frames. Engineering Structures, 30(7), 1802–1819.ElghazouliA. Y.CastroJ. M.IzzuddinB. A.2008Seismic performance of composite moment-resisting framesEngineering Structures3071802181910.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.004Search in Google Scholar
Ahmed, B., & Nethercot, D. A. (1997). Prediction of initial stiffness and available rotation capacity of major axis composite flush endplate connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 41(1), 31–60.AhmedB.NethercotD. A.1997Prediction of initial stiffness and available rotation capacity of major axis composite flush endplate connectionsJournal of Constructional Steel Research411316010.1016/S0143-974X(96)00053-3Search in Google Scholar
Liew, J. R., Teo, T., Shanmugam, N., & Yu, C. (2000). Testing of steel–concrete composite connections and appraisal of results. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 56(2), 117–150.LiewJ. R.TeoT.ShanmugamN.YuC.2000Testing of steel–concrete composite connections and appraisal of resultsJournal of Constructional Steel Research56211715010.1016/S0143-974X(99)00099-1Search in Google Scholar
Da Silva, L. S., Simoes, R. D., & Cruz, P. J. (2001). Experimental behaviour of end-plate beam-to-column composite joints under monotonical loading. Engineering Structures, 23(11), 1383–1409.DaSilva, L. S.SimoesR. D.CruzP. J.2001Experimental behaviour of end-plate beam-to-column composite joints under monotonical loadingEngineering Structures23111383140910.1016/S0141-0296(01)00054-2Search in Google Scholar
Liew, J. R., Teo, T., & Shanmugam, N. (2004). Composite joints subject to reversal of loading–Part 2: analytical assessments. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(2), 247–268.LiewJ. R.TeoT.ShanmugamN.2004Composite joints subject to reversal of loading–Part 2: analytical assessmentsJournal of Constructional Steel Research60224726810.1016/j.jcsr.2003.08.011Search in Google Scholar
Liew, J. R., Teo, T., & Shanmugam, N. (2004). Composite joints subject to reversal of loading–Part 1: experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(2), 221–246.LiewJ. R.TeoT.ShanmugamN.2004Composite joints subject to reversal of loading–Part 1: experimental studyJournal of Constructional Steel Research60222124610.1016/j.jcsr.2003.08.010Search in Google Scholar
Fu, F., & Lam, D. (2006). Experimental study on semi-rigid composite joints with steel beams and precast hollowcore slabs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(8), 771–782.FuF.LamD.2006Experimental study on semi-rigid composite joints with steel beams and precast hollowcore slabsJournal of Constructional Steel Research62877178210.1016/j.jcsr.2005.11.013Search in Google Scholar
Vasdravellis, G., Valente, M., & Castiglioni, C. A. (2009). Dynamic response of composite frames with different shear connection degree. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(10-11), 2050–2061.VasdravellisG.ValenteM.CastiglioniC. A.2009Dynamic response of composite frames with different shear connection degreeJournal of Constructional Steel Research6510112050206110.1016/j.jcsr.2009.05.001Search in Google Scholar
Piluso, V., Rizzano, G., & Tolone, I. (2012). An advanced mechanical model for composite connections under hogging/sagging moments. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 72(35–50).PilusoV.RizzanoG.ToloneI.2012An advanced mechanical model for composite connections under hogging/sagging momentsJournal of Constructional Steel Research72355010.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.001Search in Google Scholar
Barcewicz, W., & Gizejowski, M. A. (2013). Experimental tests of composite joints subjected to hogging and sagging bending moments. Paper presented at the: Proceedings of International Conference on Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete VII, North Queensland, Australia.BarcewiczW.GizejowskiM. A.2013Experimental tests of composite joints subjected to hogging and sagging bending momentsPaper presented at the: Proceedings of International Conference on Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete VII, North QueenslandAustralia10.1061/9780784479735.028Search in Google Scholar
Thai, H. T., Vo, T. P., Nguyen, T. K., & Pham, C. H. (2017). Explicit simulation of bolted endplate composite beam-to-CFST column connections. Thin-Walled Structures, 119(749–759).ThaiH. T.VoT. P.NguyenT. K.PhamC. H.2017Explicit simulation of bolted endplate composite beam-to-CFST column connectionsThin-Walled Structures11974975910.1016/j.tws.2017.07.013Search in Google Scholar
Aksoylar, N. D., Elnashai, A. S., & Mahmoud, H. (2011). The design and seismic performance of low-rise long-span frames with semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 67(1), 114–126.AksoylarN. D.ElnashaiA. S.MahmoudH.2011The design and seismic performance of low-rise long-span frames with semi-rigid connectionsJournal of Constructional Steel Research67111412610.1016/j.jcsr.2010.07.001Search in Google Scholar
Sekulovic, M., & Nefovska-Danilovic, M. (2008). Contribution to transient analysis of inelastic steel frames with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures, 30(4), 976–989.SekulovicM.Nefovska-DanilovicM.2008Contribution to transient analysis of inelastic steel frames with semi-rigid connectionsEngineering Structures30497698910.1016/j.engstruct.2007.06.004Search in Google Scholar
Vellasco, P. D. S., De Andrade, S., Da Silva, J., De Lima, L., & Brito Jr, O. (2006). A parametric analysis of steel and composite portal frames with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures, 28(4), 543–556.VellascoP. D. S.DeAndrade S.DaSilva J.De LimaL.BritoJr, O.2006A parametric analysis of steel and composite portal frames with semi-rigid connectionsEngineering Structures28454355610.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.010Search in Google Scholar
Louzai, A., & Abed, A. (2015). Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(6), 1773–1793.LouzaiA.AbedA.2015Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analysesBulletin of Earthquake Engineering1361773179310.1007/s10518-014-9689-7Search in Google Scholar
Eurocode 4. (2001) Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach.Eurocode 42001Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National ApproachSearch in Google Scholar
l’Urbanisme, M. d. l. H. e. d. (2003). Règles Parasismiques Algériennes RPA 99/Version 2003 (Algerian Seismic Rules RPA 99 / Version 2003). In M. d. l. H. e. d. l’Urbanisme (Ed.), (Edition CGS ed.).l’UrbanismeM. d. l. H. e. d.2003Règles Parasismiques Algériennes RPA 99/Version 2003 (Algerian Seismic Rules RPA 99 / Version 2003). Inl’UrbanismeM. d. l. H. e. d.(Ed.), (Edition CGS ed.)Search in Google Scholar
Applied Technology Council, ATC-19 (1995) Structural response modification factors, Redwood City, California.Applied Technology Council, ATC-191995Structural response modification factorsRedwood City, CaliforniaSearch in Google Scholar
Titoum, M., Tehami, M., & Achour, B. (2009). Effects of partial shear connection on the behavior of semi-continuous composite beams. International Journal of Steel Structures, 9(4), 301–313.TitoumM.TehamiM.AchourB.2009Effects of partial shear connection on the behavior of semi-continuous composite beamsInternational Journal of Steel Structures9430131310.1007/BF03249504Search in Google Scholar
(AFNOR), A. F. d. N. (2002). Eurocode 3 «Calcul des structures en acier» et Document d’Application Nationale-Partie 1-1: Règles générales et règles pour les bâtiments (Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures–Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings).(AFNOR), A. F. d. N.2002Eurocode 3 «Calcul des structures en acier» et Document d’Application Nationale-Partie 1-1: Règles générales et règles pour les bâtiments (Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures–Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings)Search in Google Scholar
Rajendran, S., & Kumar, S. (2017). Design of semi-rigid steel-concrete composite frames for seismic performance. J Struct Eng (SERC, Madras) 44 (136–147).RajendranS.KumarS.2017Design of semi-rigid steel-concrete composite frames for seismic performanceJ Struct Eng (SERC, Madras)44136147Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, D., Aribert, J. M., Bode, H., & Kronenburger, H. J. (2000). Design rotation capacity of composite joints. Struct. Eng, 78(25–29).AndersonD.AribertJ. M.BodeH.KronenburgerH. J.2000Design rotation capacity of composite joints Struct. Eng7825–29Search in Google Scholar
Hensman, J., & Nethercot, D. (2001). Numerical study of unbraced composite frames: generation of data to validate use of the wind moment method of design. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 57(7), 791–809.HensmanJ.NethercotD.2001Numerical study of unbraced composite frames: generation of data to validate use of the wind moment method of designJournal of Constructional Steel Research57779180910.1016/S0143-974X(01)00008-6Search in Google Scholar
Standard, B. (2004). Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part I: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.StandardB.2004Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistancePart I: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildingsSearch in Google Scholar
Newmark, N. M., & Hall, W. J. (1982). Earthquake spectra and design (C. E. E. R. I. Berkeley Ed. First Edition ed.).NewmarkN. M.HallW. J.1982Earthquake spectra and designBerkeleyC. E. E. R. I.Ed. First Edition ed.Search in Google Scholar
Mwafy, A., & Elnashai, A. S. (2001). Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Engineering Structures, 23(5), 407–424.MwafyA.ElnashaiA. S.2001Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildingsEngineering Structures23540742410.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7Search in Google Scholar
Monavari, B., & Massumi, A. (2012). Estimating displacement demand in reinforced concrete frames using some failure criteria. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 4(1), 4.MonavariB.MassumiA.2012Estimating displacement demand in reinforced concrete frames using some failure criteriaInternational Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering41410.1186/2008-6695-4-4Search in Google Scholar
Balendra, T., & Huang, X. (2003). Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(8), 1019–1035.BalendraT.HuangX.2003Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950Journal of Structural Engineering12981019103510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1019)Search in Google Scholar
FEMA-356 : Prestandard and commentary for the Seismic rehabilitation of Buildings (2000).FEMA-356 : Prestandard and commentary for the Seismic rehabilitation of Buildings2000Search in Google Scholar
SAP2000 (2009) Three dimensional static and dynamic finite element analysis and design of structures V14. Computers and Structures Inc, Berkeley, California.SAP20002009Three dimensional static and dynamic finite element analysis and design of structures V14Computers and Structures IncBerkeley, CaliforniaSearch in Google Scholar
Thermou, G., Elnashai, A. S., Plumier, A., & Doneux, C. (2004). Seismic design and performance of composite frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(1), 31–57.ThermouG.ElnashaiA. S.PlumierA.DoneuxC.2004Seismic design and performance of composite framesJournal of Constructional Steel Research601315710.1016/j.jcsr.2003.08.006Search in Google Scholar