Contemporary hybrid acrylic materials and modern thermoplastics in the manufacture of dental prostheses

1 Alla RK, Sajjan S, Alluri VR, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya N. Influence of fiber reinforcement on the properties of denture base resins. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 2013;4(1):91-7. doi: 10.4236/jbnb.2013.41012. Search in Google Scholar

2 Gad MM, Fouda SM, Al-Harbi FA, Näpänkangas R, Raustia A. PMMA denture base material enhancement: a review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. Int J Nanomedicine 2017;12:3801-12. Search in Google Scholar

3 Braden M, Davy KW, Parker S, Ladizesky NH, Ward IM. Denture base poly(methyl methacrylate) reinforced with ultra-thin modulus polyethylene fibers. Br Dent J 1988;164(4):109-13. Search in Google Scholar

4 Nakamura M, Takahashi H, Hayakawa I. Reinforcement of denture base resin with short-rod glass fiber. Dent Mater J 2007;26(5):733-8. Search in Google Scholar

5 Marei MK, El-Sabrooty A, Ragab AY, El-Osairy MA. A study of some physical and mechanical properties of metal-filled acrylic resin. Saudi Dent J 1994;6:69-77. Search in Google Scholar

6 Wang R, Kayacan R, Küçükeşmen C. Nanotubes/polymethyl methacrylate composite resins as denture base materials. In: Zhang M, Naik RR, Dai L, editors. Carbon nanomaterials for biomedical applications. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 227-40. Search in Google Scholar

7 Mahmood WS. The effect of incorporating carbon nanotubes on impact, transverse strength, hardness, and roughness to high impact denture base material. J Bagh Coll Dent 2015;27(1):96-9. Search in Google Scholar

8 Ibrahim RA. The effect of adding single walled carbon nanotube with different concentrations on mechanical properties of heat-cure acrylic denture base material. J Bagh Coll Dent 2015;27(3):28-32. Search in Google Scholar

9 Wang R, Tao J, Yu B, Dai L. Characterization of multiwalled carbon nano-tube-polymethyl methacrylate composite resins as denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111(4):318-26. Search in Google Scholar

10 Harini P, Mohamed K, Padmanabhan TV. Effect of Titanium dioxide nano-particles on the flexural strength of polymethylmethacrylate: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2014;25(4):459-63. Search in Google Scholar

11 Ahmed MA, El-Shennawy M, Althomali YM, Omar AA. Effect of titanium dioxide nano particles incorporation on mechanical and physical properties on two different types of acrylic resin denture base. World J Nano Sci Eng 2016;6(3):111-9. Search in Google Scholar

12 Asar NV, Albayrak H, Korkmaz T, Turkyilmaz I. Influence of various metal oxides on mechanical and physical properties of heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base resins. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5(3):241-7. Search in Google Scholar

13 Kul E, Aladağ Lİ, Yesildal R. Evaluation of thermal conductivity and flexural strength properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base material reinforced with different fillers. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116(5):803-10. Search in Google Scholar

14 Nejatian T, Johnson A, Van Noort R. Reinforcement of denture base resin. Adv Sci Technol 2006;49:124-9. Search in Google Scholar

15 Alwan SA, Alameer SS. The effect of the addition of silanized Nano titania fillers on some physical and mechanical properties of heat cured acrylic denture base materials. J Bagh Coll Dent 2015;27(1):86-91. Search in Google Scholar

16 Safi IN. Evaluation the effect of nano-fillers (TiO2, AL2O3, SiO2) addition on glass transition temperature, E-Modulus and coefficient of thermal expansion of acrylic denture base material. J Bagh Coll Dent 2014;26(1):37-41. Search in Google Scholar

17 Balos S, Pilic B, Markovic D, Pavlicevic J, Luzanin O. Poly(methyl-methacrylate) nanocomposites with low silica addition. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111(4):327-34. Search in Google Scholar

18 da Silva LH, Feitosa SA, Valera MC, de Araujo MA, Tango RN. Effect of the addition of silanated silica on the mechanical properties of microwave heat-cured acrylic resin. Gerodontology 2012;29(2):1019-23. Search in Google Scholar

19 Cevik P, Yildirim-Bicer AZ. The effect of silica and prepolymer nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of denture base acrylic resin. J Pros-thodont 2018;27(8):763-70. Search in Google Scholar

20 Al-Rais RY, Al-Nakkash WA, Al-Bakri AK. Filler reinforced acrylic denture base material. Part 2 – effect of water sorption on dimensional changes and transverse strength. J Bagh Coll Dent 2005;17(1):6-10. Search in Google Scholar

21 Gad M, ArRejaie AS, Abdel-Halim MS, Rahoma A. The reinforcement effect of nano-zirconia on the transverse strength of repaired acrylic denture base. Int J Dent 2016;2016:7094056. Search in Google Scholar

22 Zhang XJ, Zhang XY, Zhu BS, Qian C. Effect of nano ZrO2 on flexural strength and surface hardness of polymethylmethacrylate. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2011;20(4):358-63. Search in Google Scholar

23 Safi IN, Hassanen KA, Ali NA. Assessment of zirconium oxide nanofillers incorporation and silanation on impact, tensile strength and color alteration of heat polymerized acrylic resin. J Bagh Coll Dent 2012;24(2):36-42. Search in Google Scholar

24 Mohammed D, Mudhaffar M. Effect of modified zirconium oxide nano-fillers addition on some properties of heat cure acrylic denture base material. J Bagh Coll Dent 2012;24(4):1-7. Search in Google Scholar

25 Yu W, Wang X, Tang Q, Guo M, Zhao J. Reinforcement of denture base PMMA with ZrO(2) nanotubes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;32:192-7. Search in Google Scholar

26 Mahross HZ, Baroudi K. Effect of silver nanoparticles incorporation on viscoelastic properties of acrylic resin denture base material. Eur J Dent 2015;9(2):207-12. Search in Google Scholar

27 Hamedi-Rad F, Ghaffari T, Rezaii F, Ramazani A. Effect of nanosilver on thermal and mechanical properties of acrylic base complete dentures. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11(5):495-505. Search in Google Scholar

28 Juan Carlos FA, Rene GC, Germán VS, Laura Susana AT. Antimicrobial poly(methyl methacrylate) with silver nanoparticles for dentistry: a systematic review. Appl Sci 2020;10(11):4007. doi: 10.3390/app10114007. Search in Google Scholar

29 Farina AP, Cecchin D, Soares RG, Botelho AL, Takahashi JM, Mazzetto MO, et al. Evaluation of Vickers hardness of different types of acrylic denture base resins with and without glass fibre reinforcement. Gerodontology 2012;29(2):e155-60. Search in Google Scholar

30 Agha H, Flinton R, Vaidyanathan T. Optimization of fracture resistance and stiffness of heat-polymerized high impact acrylic resin with localized E-Glass Fiber Reinforcement® at different stress points. J Prosthodont 2016;25(8):647-55. Search in Google Scholar

31 Moreno-Maldonado V, Acosta-Torres LS, Barcelo-Santana FH, Vanegas-Lancon RD, Plata-Rodrıguez ME, Castano VM. Fiber-reinforced nano-pigmented poly(methyl methacrylate) as improved denture base. J Appl Polym Sci 2012;126:289-96. Search in Google Scholar

32 Jassim RK, Radhi AA. Evaluation the biological effect of two types of denture base materials reinforced with silanated glass fiber. J Bagh Coll Dent 2011;23(2):26-30. Search in Google Scholar

33 Soygun K, Bolayir G, Boztug A. Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials. J Adv Pros-thodont 2013;5(2):153-60. Search in Google Scholar

34 Yu SH, Ahn DH, Park JS, Chung YS, Han IS, Lim JS, et al. Comparison of denture base resin reinforced with polyaromatic polyamide fibers of different orientations. Dent Mater J 2013;32(2):332-40. Search in Google Scholar

35 Chen SY, Liang WM, Yen PS. Reinforcement of acrylic denture base resin by incorporation of various fibers. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58(2):203-8. Search in Google Scholar

36 Uzun G, Hersek N, Tinçer T. Effect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(5):616-20. Search in Google Scholar

37 Mowade TK, Dange SP, Thakre MB, Kamble VD. Effect of fiber reinforcement on impact strength of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin: in vitro study and SEM analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4(1):30-6. Search in Google Scholar

38 John J, Ann Mani S, Palaniswamy K, Ramanathan A, Razak AA. Flex-ural properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) resin reinforced with oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers: a preliminary finding. J Prosthodont 2015;24(3):233-8. Search in Google Scholar

39 Xu J, Li Y, Yu T, Cong L. Reinforcement of denture base resin with short vegetable fiber. Dent Mater 2013;29(12):1273-9. Search in Google Scholar

40 Yuan P, Tan D, Annabi-Bergaya F. Properties and applications of halloysite nanotubes: recent research advances and future prospects. Appl Clay Sci 2015;112-113:75-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.001. Search in Google Scholar

41 Bertolino V, Cavallaro G, Milioto S, Lazzara G. Polysaccharides/Halloysite nanotubes for smart bionanocomposite materials. Carbohydr Polym 2020;245:116502. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116502. Search in Google Scholar

42 Sakiewicz P, Lutynski M, Soltys J, Pytlinski A. Purification of halloysite by magnetic separation. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 2016;52(2):911-1001. Search in Google Scholar

43 Abdallah RM. Evaluation of polymethyl methacrylate resin mechanical properties with incorporated halloysite nanotubes. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8(3):167-71. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.167. Search in Google Scholar

44 Fister JS, Memoli VA, Galante JO, Rosteker W, Urban MR. Biocompatibility of Derlin 150: A creep-resistant polymer for total join prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1985;19(5):519-33. Search in Google Scholar

45 Maeda M. Experimental studies on polyacetal composites for joint pros-thesis. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1984;58(9):919-36. Search in Google Scholar

46 Kirsch A, Ackermann KL. The IMZ osteointegrated implant system. Dent Clin North Am 1989;33(4):733-91. Search in Google Scholar

47 Lagemann U, Heinzelmann I. Azetal – ein innovativer Werkstoff. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 1997;23:797-804. Search in Google Scholar

48 Rutkowski A. Acetal – estetyczna alternatywa rozwiązań protetycznych. Nowocz Tech Dent 2007;4:35-8. Search in Google Scholar

49 Sikorska-Bochińska J, Urbanek R. Elastyczne i sprężyste tworzywo na protezy ruchome i stałe w aspekcie alergii kontaktowej. Twój Prz Stomatol 2005;5:32-4. Search in Google Scholar

50 Ardelean L, Bortun CM, Podariu AC, Rusu LC. Thermoplastic resins used in dentistry. In: Das CK, editor. Thermoplastic elastomers – synthesis and applications. London: Intech Open; 2015. doi: 10.5772/60931. Search in Google Scholar

51 Kieć-Świerczyńska M. Alergia kontaktowa. Świat Med Farm 2003;46:53-9. Search in Google Scholar

52 Ślusarski P, Langot C. Zastosowanie materiału T.S.M. Acetal Dental w wykonawstwie kosmetycznej częściowej protezy nieosiadającej – opis przypadku. Stomatol Współ 2008;5:29-31. Search in Google Scholar

53 Wawrzynkiewicz T, Ledzion S. Współczesne poglądy na alergię w stomatologii. Stom Współcz 1997;16:19-21. Search in Google Scholar

54 Bielski J, Kaśka M. Wpływ metalowych uzupełnień protetycznych na procesy elektrochemiczne w jamie ustnej. Protet Stomatol 1973;23:379-85. Search in Google Scholar

55 Spiechowicz E. Uczulenia na chrom i nikiel. Protet Stomatol 1981;31:1-6. Search in Google Scholar

56 Arikan A, Ozkan YK, Arda T, Akalin B. An in vitro investigation of water sorption and solubility of two acetal denture base materials. Eur J Pros-thodont Restor Dent 2005;13(3):119-22. Search in Google Scholar

57 Frączak B, Sobolewska E, Ey-Chmielewska H, Chlubek D, Noceń I. The influence of nutritional factors and saliva pH on the shade of resin. Pol J Environ Stud 2007;16(2):353-7. Search in Google Scholar

58 Sobolewska E, Frączak B, Ey-Chmielewska H, Czarnomysy-Furowicz D, Karakulska J, Ferlas M. Żywotność podstawowych szczepów bakteryjnych na wybranych materiałach protetycznych. Protet Stomatol 2009;59(3):170-1. Search in Google Scholar

59 Sobolewska E, Frączak B, Czarnomysy-Furowicz D, Ey-Chmielewska H, Karakulska J. Bacteria adhesion to the surface of various prosthetics materials. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2007;53(2):68-71. Search in Google Scholar

60 Sobolewska E, Frączak B, Lipski M, Grabikowska-Prowans K, Kosierkiewicz A. Żywica acetalowa jako zewnętrzny czynnik alergizujący w środowisku jamy ustnej – badania kliniczne i laboratoryjne. Dent Med Probl 2010;47(1):17-24. Search in Google Scholar

61 Sobolewska E, Frączak B, Ey-Chmielewska H, Machoy-Mokrzyńska A. Wpływ żywicy acetalowej na tkanki w badaniach in vitro. Protet Stomatol 2007;57(5):45. Search in Google Scholar

62 Sobolewska E, Frączak B, Ey-Chmielewska H, Machoy-Mokrzyńska A. Wpływ żywicy acetalowej na tkanki w badaniach na szczurach szczepu Wistar. Protet Stomatol 2008;58(6):419-23. Search in Google Scholar

63 Sobolewska E, Frączak B, Safronow K, Kosierkiewicz A, Lipski M. Wpływ wybranych materiałów stosowanych w protetyce odtwórczej na reakcję tkanek w badaniach in vitro. Dent Med Probl 2009;46(1):33-9. Search in Google Scholar

64 Staniland P, Wilde CJ, Bottino FA, Di Pasquale G, Pollicino A, Recca A. Synthesis, characterization and study of the thermal properties of new polyarylene ethers. Polymer 1992;33(9):1976-81. Search in Google Scholar

65 Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007;28(32):4845-69. Search in Google Scholar

66 Green S, Schlegel J. A polyaryletherketone biomaterial for use in medical implant applications. Chem Artic News 2015;5(8):1-9. Search in Google Scholar

67 Monich PR, Berti FV, Porto LM, Henriques B, Novaes de Oliveira AP, Fredel MC, et al. Physicochemical and biological assessment of PEEK composites embedding natural amorphous silica fibers for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2017;79:354-62. Search in Google Scholar

68 Xin H, Shepherd D, Dearn K. Strength of polyether-ether-ketone: effects of sterilisation and thermal ageing. Polym Test 2013;32(6):1001-5. Search in Google Scholar

69 Schwitalla A, Müller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 2013;39(6):743-9. Search in Google Scholar

70 Kizuki T, Matsushita T, Kokubo T. Apatite-forming PEEK with TiO2 surface layer coating. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015;26(1):5359. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5359-1. Search in Google Scholar

71 Garcia-Gonzalez D, Rusinek A, Jankowiak T, Arias A. Mechanical impact behavior of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK). Compos Struct 2015;124:88-99. Search in Google Scholar

72 Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001. Search in Google Scholar

73 Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The use of a modified poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses. A clinical report. Prosthodont 2016;25(7):580-4. Search in Google Scholar

74 Fan JP, Tsui CP, Tang CY, Chow CL. Influence of interphase layer on the overall elasto-plastic behaviors of HA/PEEK biocomposite. Biomaterials 2004;25(23):5363-73. Search in Google Scholar

75 Han CM, Lee EJ, Kim HE, Koh YH, Kim KN, Ha Y, et al. The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyethereethereketone (PEEK) and resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials 2010;31(13):3465-70. Search in Google Scholar

76 Williams DF, McNamara A, Turner RM. Potential of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK in medical applications. J Material Sci Letters 1987;6:188-90. Search in Google Scholar

77 Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, Wening JV, von Foerster G. Polyetheretherketone – cytotoxity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials 2002;23(8):1749-59. Search in Google Scholar

78 Steinberg EL, Rath E, Shlaifer A, Chechik O, Maman E, Salai M. Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK Optima – a composite material biomechanical properties and wear/debris characteristics of CF-PEEK composites for orthopedic trauma implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;17:221-8. Search in Google Scholar

79 Rabiei A, Sandukas S. Processing and evaluation of bioactive coatings on polymeric implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013;101(9):2621-9. Search in Google Scholar

80 Barkarmo S, Wennerberg A, Hoffman M, Kjellin P, Breding K, Handa P, et al. Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implants: a pilot study in rabbit bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013;101(2):465-71. Search in Google Scholar

81 Wang L, He S, Wu X, Liang S, Mu Z, Wei J, et al. Polyetheretherketone/nano-fluorohydroxyapatite composite with antimicrobial activity and osseointegration properties. Biomaterials 2014;35(25):6758-75. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.085. Search in Google Scholar

82 Poulsson AH, Eglin D, Zeiter S, Camenisch K, Sprecher C, Agarwal Y, et al. Osseointegration of machined, injection moulded and oxygen plasma modified PEEK implants in a sheep model. Biomaterials 2014;35(12):3717-28. Search in Google Scholar

83 Ma R, Tang T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci 2014;15(4):5426-45. Search in Google Scholar

84 Feng YF, Wang L, Zhang Y, Li X, Ma ZS, Zou JW, et al. Effect of reactive oxygen species overproduction on osteogenesis of porous titanium implant in the present of diabetes mellitus. Biomaterials 2013;34(9):2234-43. Search in Google Scholar

85 Sagomonyants KB, Jarman-Smith ML, Devine JN, Aronow MS, Gronowicz GA. The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials 2008;29(11):1563-72. Search in Google Scholar

86 Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Otani T, Suda Y, Toyama Y. Metal ion concentrations in the joint fluid immediately after total knee arthroplasty. Mod Rheumatol 2001;11(3):192-6. Search in Google Scholar

87 Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim III HB, Turner AS. Polieteroeteroketon jako materiał do zastosowań kręgosłupa. Biomateriały 2006;27(3):324-34. Search in Google Scholar

88 Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina R, Schenk RK, Buser D, et al. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006;85(5):473-8. Search in Google Scholar

89 Mouhyi J, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Albrektsson T. The peri-implantitis: implant surfaces, microstructure, and physicochemical aspects. Clin Implant Dent Retal Res 2012;14(2):170-83. Search in Google Scholar

90 Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials 2006;27(11):2331-9. Search in Google Scholar

91 Sanpo N, Tan ML, Cheang P, Khor KA. Antibacterial property of cold-sprayed HA-Ag/PEEK coating. J Therm Spray Techn 2009;18(1):10-5. Search in Google Scholar

92 Sandukas S, Yamamoto A, Rabiei A. Osteoblast adhesion to functionally graded hydroxyapatite coatings doped with silver. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011;97(4):490-7. Search in Google Scholar

93 Kim YS, Song MY, Park JD, Song KS, Ryu HR, Chung YH, et al. Subchronic oral toxicity of silver nanoparticles. Part Fibre Toxicol 2010;7:20-30. Search in Google Scholar

94 Albers CE, Hofstetter W, Siebenrock KA, Landmann R, Klenke FM. In vitro cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles on osteoblasts and osteoclasts at antibacterial concentrations. Nanotoxicology 2013;7(1):30-6. Search in Google Scholar

95 Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hämmerle CH. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments. Appl Surf Sci 2012;258(18):7213-8. Search in Google Scholar

96 Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketone – a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101(7):1209-16. Search in Google Scholar

97 Costa-Palau S, Torrents-Nicolas J, Brufau-de Barberà M, Cabratosa-Termes J. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(3):680-2. Search in Google Scholar