This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Demircan S, Demircan E: Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of the anterior maxillary bone thickness for immediate implant placement. Implant Dent 2015; 24: 664–668.DemircanSDemircanE:Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of the anterior maxillary bone thickness for immediate implant placement.Implant Dent2015;24:664–668.10.1097/ID.000000000000034026460741Search in Google Scholar
Andrés-García R, Vives NG, Climent FH, Palacín AF, Santos VR, Climent MH et al.: Invitro evaluation of the influence of the cortical bone on the primary stability of two implant systems. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14: E93–97.Andrés-GarcíaRVivesNGClimentFHPalacínAFSantosVRClimentMH:Invitro evaluation of the influence of the cortical bone on the primary stability of two implant systems.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2009;14:93–97.Search in Google Scholar
Lindhe J, Meyle J, Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology: Peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 282–285.LindheJMeyleJGroup D of European Workshop on Periodontology:Peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology.J Clin Periodontol2008;35:282–285.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01283.x18724855Search in Google Scholar
Harris D, Horner K, Grondahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI et al.: E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1243–1253.HarrisDHornerKGrondahlKJacobsRHelmrotEBenicGI:E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw.Clin Oral Implants Res2012;23:1243–1253.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02441.x22432473Search in Google Scholar
Kuhl S, Zürcher S, Zitzmann NU, Filippi A, Payer M, Dagassan-Berndt D: Detection of peri-implant bone defects with different radiographic techniques – a human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 529–534.KuhlSZürcherSZitzmannNUFilippiAPayerMDagassan-BerndtD:Detection of peri-implant bone defects with different radiographic techniques – a human cadaver study.Clin Oral Implants Res2016;27:529–534.10.1111/clr.1261926059443Search in Google Scholar
García-García M, Mir-Mari J, Benic GI, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E: Accuracy of periapical radiography in assessing bone level in implants affected by peri-implantitis: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Periodontol 2016; 43: 85–91.García-GarcíaMMir-MariJBenicGIFigueiredoRValmaseda-CastellonE:Accuracy of periapical radiography in assessing bone level in implants affected by peri-implantitis: a cross-sectional study.J Clin Periodontol2016;43:85–91.10.1111/jcpe.1249126660842Search in Google Scholar
Dave M, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer R: A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 671–678.DaveMDaviesJWilsonRPalmerR:A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.Clin Oral Implants Res2013;24:671–678.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02473.x22458628Search in Google Scholar
Golubovic V, Mihatovic I, Becker J, Schwarz F: Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography to assess the configuration and extent of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects. A pilot study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 16: 349–354.GolubovicVMihatovicIBeckerJSchwarzF:Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography to assess the configuration and extent of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects. A pilot study.Oral Maxillofac Surg2012;16:349–354.10.1007/s10006-012-0320-222476693Search in Google Scholar
Degen K, Habor D, Radermacher K, Heger S, Kern JS, Wolfart S et al.: Assessment of cortical bone thicknessusingultrasound. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 520–528.DegenKHaborDRadermacherKHegerSKernJSWolfartS:Assessment of cortical bone thicknessusingultrasound.Clin Oral Implants Res2017;28:520–528.10.1111/clr.1282927018152Search in Google Scholar
Bohner L, Habor D, Gremse F, Tortamano P, Wolfart S, Marotti J: Accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound scanner in detecting peri-implant bone defects. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45: 650–659.BohnerLHaborDGremseFTortamanoPWolfartSMarottiJ:Accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound scanner in detecting peri-implant bone defects.Ultrasound Med Biol2019;45:650–659.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.10.03030593434Search in Google Scholar
Demiralp KO, Orhan K, Kurşun-Çakmak EŞ, Gorurgoz C, Bayrak S: Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and ultrasonography with two types of probes in the detection of opaque and non-opaque foreign bodies. Med Ultrasound 2018; 20: 467–474.DemiralpKOOrhanKKurşun-ÇakmakEŞGorurgozCBayrakS:Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and ultrasonography with two types of probes in the detection of opaque and non-opaque foreign bodies.Med Ultrasound2018;20:467–474.10.11152/mu-156230534654Search in Google Scholar
Marotti J, Neuhaus S, Habor D, Bohner L, Heger S, Radermacher K et al.: High-frequency ultrasound for assessment of peri-implant bone thickness. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 1539.MarottiJNeuhausSHaborDBohnerLHegerSRadermacherK:High-frequency ultrasound for assessment of peri-implant bone thickness.J Clin Med2019;8:1539.10.3390/jcm8101539683240331557872Search in Google Scholar
Machtei EE, Zigdon H, Levin L, Peled M: Novel ultrasonic device to measure the distance from the bottom of the osteotome to various anatomic landmarks. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 1051–1055.MachteiEEZigdonHLevinLPeledM:Novel ultrasonic device to measure the distance from the bottom of the osteotome to various anatomic landmarks.J Periodontol2010;81:1051–1055.10.1902/jop.2010.09062120214439Search in Google Scholar
Salmon B, Le Denmat D: Intraoral ultrasonography: development of a specific high-frequency probe and clinical pilot study. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 643–649.SalmonBLe DenmatD:Intraoral ultrasonography: development of a specific high-frequency probe and clinical pilot study.Clin Oral Investig2012;16:643–649.10.1007/s00784-011-0533-z21380502Search in Google Scholar
Marotti J, Heger S, Tinschert J, Tortamano P, Chuembou F, Radermacher K et al.: Recent advances of ultrasound imaging in dentistry – a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115: 819–832.MarottiJHegerSTinschertJTortamanoPChuembouFRadermacherK:Recent advances of ultrasound imaging in dentistry – a review of the literature.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol2013;115:819–832.10.1016/j.oooo.2013.03.01223706922Search in Google Scholar
Habor D, Neuhaus S, Vollborn T, Wolfart S, Radermacher K, Heger S. Model based assessment of vestibular jawbone thickness using high frequency 3-D ultrasound micro-scanning. In: Proc 8675, SPIE Medical Imaging 2013: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy, 86750Z.HaborDNeuhausSVollbornTWolfartSRadermacherKHegerS.Model based assessment of vestibular jawbone thickness using high frequency 3-D ultrasound micro-scanning. In:Proc 8675, SPIE Medical Imaging 2013: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy, 86750Z.10.1117/12.2006762Search in Google Scholar
Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.LandisJRKochGG:The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics1977;33:159–174.10.2307/2529310Search in Google Scholar
Altman DG: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press 1990.AltmanDG:Practical Statistics for Medical Research.Chapman and Hall/CRC Press1990.10.1201/9780429258589Search in Google Scholar
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11–25.AlbrektssonTZarbGWorthingtonPErikssonAR:The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1986;1:11–25.Search in Google Scholar
Schliephake H, Wichmann M, Donnerstag F, Vogt S: Imaging of peri-implant bone levels of implants with buccal bone defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 193–200.SchliephakeHWichmannMDonnerstagFVogtS:Imaging of peri-implant bone levels of implants with buccal bone defects.Clin Oral Implants Res2003;14:193–200.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140209.x12656879Search in Google Scholar
Bohner LOL, Mukai E, Oderich E, Porporatti AL, Pacheco-Pereira C, Tortamano P et al.: Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 124: 432–440.BohnerLOLMukaiEOderichEPorporattiALPacheco-PereiraCTortamanoP:Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol2017;124:432–440.10.1016/j.oooo.2017.06.11928743664Search in Google Scholar
Bornstein MM, Al-Nawas B, Kuchler U, Tahmaseb A: Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding contemporary surgical and radiographic techniques in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 78–82.BornsteinMMAl-NawasBKuchlerUTahmasebA:Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding contemporary surgical and radiographic techniques in implant dentistry.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2014;29:78–82.10.11607/jomi.2013.g124660191Search in Google Scholar
Benic GI, Elmasry M, Hammerle CH: Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 86–96.BenicGIElmasryMHammerleCH:Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review.Clin Oral Implants Res2015;26:86–96.10.1111/clr.12616Search in Google Scholar
Mahmoud AM, Ngan P, Crout R, Mukdadi OM: High-resolution 3D ultrasound jawbone surface imaging for diagnosis of periodontal bony defects: an in vitro study. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 3409–3422.MahmoudAMNganPCroutRMukdadiOM:High-resolution 3D ultrasound jawbone surface imaging for diagnosis of periodontal bony defects: an in vitro study.Ann Biomed Eng2010;38:3409–3422.10.1007/s10439-010-0089-0Search in Google Scholar
Choi M, Culjat MO, Singh RS, White SN.: Ultrasound imagery for dental implant diagnosis and treatment planning in a porcine model. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 344–353.ChoiMCuljatMOSinghRSWhiteSN.:Ultrasound imagery for dental implant diagnosis and treatment planning in a porcine model.J Prosthet Dent2012;108:344–353.10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60190-5Search in Google Scholar
Chifor R, Hedeşiu M, Bolfa P, Catoi C, Crişan M, Serbănescu A et al.: The evaluation of 20 MHz ultrasonography, computed tomography scans as compared to direct microscopy for periodontal system assessment. Med Ultrason 2011; 13: 120–126.ChiforRHedeşiuMBolfaPCatoiCCrişanMSerbănescuA:The evaluation of 20 MHz ultrasonography, computed tomography scans as compared to direct microscopy for periodontal system assessment.Med Ultrason2011;13:120–126.Search in Google Scholar
Benic GI, Sancho-Puchades M, Jung RE, Deyhle H, Hammerle CH: In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 378–383.BenicGISancho-PuchadesMJungREDeyhleHHammerleCH:In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography.Clin Oral Implants Res2013;24:378–383.10.1111/clr.12048Search in Google Scholar
Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, SED-ENTEXCT Project Consortium et al.: Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 94–99.PauwelsRStamatakisHBosmansHBogaertsRJacobsRSED-ENTEXCT Project Consortium:Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images.Clin Oral Implants Res2013;24:94–99.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02382.xSearch in Google Scholar
Oeppen RS, Gibson D, Brennan PA: An update on the use of ultrasound imaging in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48: 412–418.OeppenRSGibsonDBrennanPA:An update on the use of ultrasound imaging in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg2010;48:412–418.10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.10.022Search in Google Scholar
Akizuki H, Yoshida H, Michi K: Ultrasonographic evaluation during reduction of zygomatic arch fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1990; 18: 263–266.AkizukiHYoshidaHMichiK:Ultrasonographic evaluation during reduction of zygomatic arch fractures.J Craniomaxillofac Surg1990;18:263–266.10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80428-7Search in Google Scholar
Benson BW, Flint DJ, Liang H, Opatowsky MJ: Advances in diagnostic imaging for pathologic conditions of the jaws. Head Neck Pathol 2014; 8: 383–391.BensonBWFlintDJLiangHOpatowskyMJ:Advances in diagnostic imaging for pathologic conditions of the jaws.Head Neck Pathol2014;8:383–391.10.1007/s12105-014-0575-z424541625409843Search in Google Scholar
Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho SY, Antonio G, Lee YP, King AD et al.: Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes. Cancer Imaging 2008; 8: 48–56.AhujaATYingMHoSYAntonioGLeeYPKingAD:Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes.Cancer Imaging2008;8:48–56.10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0006232436818390388Search in Google Scholar
Uchida Y, Motoyoshi M, Shigeeda T, Shinohara A, Igarashi Y, Sakaguchi M et al.: Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 654–659.UchidaYMotoyoshiMShigeedaTShinoharaAIgarashiYSakaguchiM:Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.Eur J Orthod2011;33:654–659.10.1093/ejo/cjq15221262936Search in Google Scholar
Naser-ud-Din S, Thoirs K, Sampson WJ: Ultrasonography, lateral cephalometry and 3D imaging of the human masseter muscle. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 33–43.Naser-ud-DinSThoirsKSampsonWJ:Ultrasonography, lateral cephalometry and 3D imaging of the human masseter muscle.Orthod Craniofac Res2011;14:33–43.10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01505.x21205167Search in Google Scholar
Bas B, Yılmaz N, Gökce E, Akan H: Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 1304–1310.BasBYılmazNGökceEAkanH:Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in temporomandibular disorders.J Oral Maxillofac Surg2011;69:1304–1310.10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.01221256654Search in Google Scholar
Raghav N, Reddy SS, Giridhar AG, Murthy S, Yashodha Devi BK, Santana N et al.: Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography, and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 379–385.RaghavNReddySSGiridharAGMurthySYashodha DeviBKSantanaN:Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography, and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2010;110:379–385.10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.03920727498Search in Google Scholar
Tikku AP, Kumar S, Loomba K, Chandra A, Verma P, Aggarwal R: Use of ultrasound, color Doppler imaging and radiography to monitor periapical healing after endodontic surgery. J Oral Sci 2010; 52: 411–416.TikkuAPKumarSLoombaKChandraAVermaPAggarwalR:Use of ultrasound, color Doppler imaging and radiography to monitor periapical healing after endodontic surgery.J Oral Sci2010;52:411–416.10.2334/josnusd.52.41120881334Search in Google Scholar
Caglayan F, Bayrakdar IS: The intraoral ultrasonography in dentistry. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21: 125–133.CaglayanFBayrakdarIS:The intraoral ultrasonography in dentistry.Niger J Clin Pract2018;21:125–133.Search in Google Scholar
Bayrakdar IS, Yılmaz AB, Kaplan FA, Bilgir E, Orhan K: Evaluation of the snowing-like ultrasonographic features of intraosseous jaw pathologies. J Ultrason 2021; 20: e307–e310.BayrakdarISYılmazABKaplanFABilgirEOrhanK:Evaluation of the snowing-like ultrasonographic features of intraosseous jaw pathologies.J Ultrason2021;20:307–310.10.15557/JoU.2020.0053783014633500799Search in Google Scholar
Delantoni A, Sarafopoulos A, Polanagnostaki A, Orhan K: B-mode and color Doppler imaging of carotid paragangliomas in different neck regions. J Ultrason 2020; 20: e218–e221.DelantoniASarafopoulosAPolanagnostakiAOrhanK:B-mode and color Doppler imaging of carotid paragangliomas in different neck regions.J Ultrason2020;20:218–221.10.15557/JoU.2020.0037770548233365160Search in Google Scholar
Malek SN, Sayed IS. Multi-frequency ultrasound imaging: phantom study. Int J Allied Health Sci 2018; 2: 304–309.MalekSNSayedIS.Multi-frequency ultrasound imaging: phantom study.Int J Allied Health Sci2018;2:304–309.Search in Google Scholar
Wiafe YA, Badu-Peprah A: The influence of ultrasound equipment knobology in abdominal sonography. In: S.A.A. Gamie, E.M. Foda (ed.): Essentials of Abdominal Ultrasound. Intech Open 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.83713.WiafeYABadu-PeprahA:The influence of ultrasound equipment knobology in abdominal sonography. In:S.A.A.GamieE.M.Foda(ed.):Essentials of Abdominal Ultrasound.Intech Open2019. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.83713.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar