O artykule
Article Category: original-paper
Data publikacji: 28 cze 2019
Zakres stron: 98 - 104
Otrzymano: 28 lis 2018
Przyjęty: 22 sty 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2019.0014
Słowa kluczowe
© 2019 Ababacar Mbengue et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Distribution of peritoneal lesions found on ultrasound
| Ultrasound anomalies | Number | % |
|---|---|---|
| Parietal peritoneum | 34 | 89.4% |
| Ascites | 32 | 84.2% |
| Large omentum | 28 | 73.6% |
| Mesentery | 24 | 63.1% |
Distribution of parietal peritoneum lesions on ultrasound
| Anomalies of the parietal peritoneum | Number | % |
|---|---|---|
| Regular hypoechoic thickening | 24 | 70.5% |
| Peritoneal nodules | 4 | 11.7% |
| Hypoechoic thickening and nodules | 6 | 17.6% |
Distribution of clinical signs
| Clinical signs | Number | % |
|---|---|---|
| Ascites | 29 | 76% |
| Fever | 24 | 63% |
| Abdominal pain | 9 | 23% |
| Weight loss | 26 | 68% |
| Surgical table | 1 | 2% |
Distribution of lesions of the large omentum on ultrasound
| Anomalies of the large omentum | Number | % |
|---|---|---|
| Triple layer thickening | 13 | 46.4% |
| Single layer hyperechoic thickening | 6 | 21.4% |
| Nodular heterogeneous thickening | 9 | 32.1% |