This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Witmer M, Veersema S, Brölmann HA et al.: Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 372–382.Bij de VaateAJvan der VoetLFNajiOWitmerMVeersemaSBrölmannHA:Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2014;43:372–382.10.1002/uog.13199Search in Google Scholar
Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brölmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA: Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 2695–2702.VervoortAJUittenbogaardLBHehenkampWJBrölmannHAMolBWHuirneJA:Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.Hum Reprod2015;30:2695–2702.10.1093/humrep/dev240Search in Google Scholar
Bij de Vaate AJ, Brölmann HA, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne JA: Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: Relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 93–99.Bij de VaateAJBrölmannHAvan der VoetLFvan der SlikkeJWVeersemaSHuirneJA:Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: Relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2011;37:93–99.10.1002/uog.8864Search in Google Scholar
Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, Escalona J, Muñoz JF, Mackenna A et al.: The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnositic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 695–700.FabresCAvilesGDe La JaraCEscalonaJMuñozJFMackennaA:The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnositic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy.J Ultrasound Med2003;22:695–700.10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.695Search in Google Scholar
Fernandez E, Fernandez C, Fabres C, Alam VV: Hysteroscopic correction of cesarean section scars in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996; 3: S13.FernandezEFernandezCFabresCAlamVV:Hysteroscopic correction of cesarean section scars in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc1996;3:S13.10.1016/S1074-3804(96)80170-8Search in Google Scholar
Bauer ST, Bonanno C: Abnormal placentation. Semin Perinatol 2009; 33: 88–96.BauerSTBonannoC:Abnormal placentation.Semin Perinatol2009;33:88–96.10.1053/j.semperi.2008.12.00319324237Search in Google Scholar
Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, Magloire LK, Pettker CM, Abdel-Razeq SS et al.: Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 808–813.HamarBDSaberSBCackovicMMagloireLKPettkerCMAbdel-RazeqSS:Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.Obstet Gynecol2007;110:808–813.10.1097/01.AOG.0000284628.29796.8017906013Search in Google Scholar
Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T, Okada M, Suzuki M, Tamakoshi K et al.: Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 429–434.HayakawaHItakuraAMitsuiTOkadaMSuzukiMTamakoshiK:Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2006;85:429–434.10.1080/0001634050043043616612704Search in Google Scholar
Yazicioglu F, Gökdogan A, Kelekci S, Aygün M, Savan K: Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 124: 32–36.YaziciogluFGökdoganAKelekciSAygünMSavanK:Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2006;124:32–36.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.02316023780Search in Google Scholar
Sevket O, Ates S, Molla T, Ozkal F, Uysal O, Dansuk R: Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 125: 219–222.SevketOAtesSMollaTOzkalFUysalODansukR:Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.Int J Gynaecol Obstet2014;125:219–222.10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.01324680843Search in Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health commissioned by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence: National evidence-based clinical guidelines: Caesarean section, April 2004. RCOG Press, London 2004; 18.National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health commissioned by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence:National evidence-based clinical guidelines: Caesarean section, April 2004.RCOG Press,London2004;18.Search in Google Scholar
Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, Yazbek J, Lee C, Gonzalez J et al.: Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 72–77.Ofili-YeboviDBen-NagiJSawyerEYazbekJLeeCGonzalezJ:Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2008;31:72–77.10.1002/uog.5200Search in Google Scholar
Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, Morency AM, Lacasse Y, Bujold E: Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32: 321–327.JastrowNChailletNRobergeSMorencyAMLacasseYBujoldE:Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.J Obstet Gynaecol Can2010;32:321–327.10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34475-9Search in Google Scholar