[Geiger R, ‘Customary International Law in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice: A Critical Appraisal’ in U Fastenrath et al (eds), From Bilateralism to Community Interest. Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (2011) 673.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.003.0043]Search in Google Scholar
[Geiger R, ‘Die zweite Krise der völkerrechtlichen Rechtsquellenlehre’ (1970) 30 ÖZöRV 215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geiger R, ‘Zur Lehre vom Völkergewohnheitsrecht in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ (1978) 103 AöR 382.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirchner J, Völkergewohnheitsrecht aus der Sicht der Rechtsanwendung (1989).]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts A, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 757.10.2307/2674625]Search in Google Scholar
[Talmon S, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26(2) European Journal of International Law 417.10.1093/ejil/chv020]Search in Google Scholar
[Tams Ch, ‘Meta-Custom and the Court: A Study in Judicial Law-Making’ (2015) 14 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 51.10.1163/15718034-12341285]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolfke K ‘Some Persistent Controversies Regarding Customary International Law’ (1993) XXIV Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 1.10.1017/S0167676800000027]Search in Google Scholar