[1. HELCOM recommendation 11/10 Guidelines for capacity calculation of sewage system on board passenger ships (1990) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. HELCOM overview on port reception facilities for sewage in the Baltic Sea area and related trends in passenger traffic (2013) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Annex IV of MARPOL 73/78 convention. HELCOM: Interim guidance on technical and operational aspects of delivery of sewage by passenger ships to port reception facilities (2013) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Chin-Shan, Lu; Wen-Hong, Liu; Wooldridge Ch. (2014) Maritime environmental governance and green shipping. Maritime Policy & Management 41(2): 131–133.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Demand study port infrastructure (2013) Project CLEANSHIP report. (Clean Baltic Sea Shipping, funded by Baltic Sea Programme 2007-2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Everett, S.; Pettitt, T. (2006) Effective corporatization of ports is a function of effective legislation: legal issues in the existing paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management 33(3): 219–232.10.1080/03088830600783137]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Homsombat, W.; Yip, T.L.; Yang, H.; Fu, X. (2013) Regional cooperation and management of port pollution. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 451–466.10.1080/03088839.2013.797118]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Julian, M. (2000) MARPOL 73/78: the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. Maritime Studies 2000(113): 16–23.10.1080/07266472.2000.10878605]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Klopott, M. (2013) Restructuring of environmental management in Baltic ports: case of Poland. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 439–450.10.1080/03088839.2013.798440]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Luo, M.; Yip, T.L. (2013) Ports and the environment. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 401–403.10.1080/03088839.2013.797122]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Mattson, G. (2006) MARPOL 73/78 and Annex I: An Assessment of its Effectiveness. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 9(2): 175–194.10.1080/13880290600728195]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Moon, D.S.-H.; Woo, J.K. (2014) The impact of port operations on efficient ship operation from both economic and environmental perspectives. Maritime Policy & Management 41(5): 444–461.10.1080/03088839.2014.931607]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Panasiuk, I.; Lebedevas, S. (2014) The assessment of the possibilities for the Lithuanian fleet to comply with new environmental requirements. Transport 29(1): 50–58.10.3846/16484142.2014.896828]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Project CLEANSHIP (Clean Baltic Sea Shipping) report DEMAND STUDY PORT INFRASTRUCTURE, funded under Baltic Sea Programme 2007-2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Venus Lun, Y.H.; Lai K-H.; Christina W.Y.; Cheng T.C.E. (2014) Green shipping practices and firm performance. Journal: Maritime Policy & Management 41(2): 134–148.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Zondag, B.; Bucci, P.; Gützkow, P.; de Jong, G. (2010) Port competition modelling including maritime, port, and hinterland characteristics. Maritime Policy & Management 37(3): 179–194.10.1080/03088831003700579]Search in Google Scholar