The Model to Assess the Implementation of Technical Conditions Defined in Annex IV of Marpol Convention 73/78: The Case of the Baltic Sea Port of Klaipeda

1. HELCOM recommendation 11/10 Guidelines for capacity calculation of sewage system on board passenger ships (1990) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.Search in Google Scholar

2. HELCOM overview on port reception facilities for sewage in the Baltic Sea area and related trends in passenger traffic (2013) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.Search in Google Scholar

3. Annex IV of MARPOL 73/78 convention. HELCOM: Interim guidance on technical and operational aspects of delivery of sewage by passenger ships to port reception facilities (2013) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.Search in Google Scholar

4. Chin-Shan, Lu; Wen-Hong, Liu; Wooldridge Ch. (2014) Maritime environmental governance and green shipping. Maritime Policy & Management 41(2): 131–133.Search in Google Scholar

5. Demand study port infrastructure (2013) Project CLEANSHIP report. (Clean Baltic Sea Shipping, funded by Baltic Sea Programme 2007-2013).Search in Google Scholar

6. Everett, S.; Pettitt, T. (2006) Effective corporatization of ports is a function of effective legislation: legal issues in the existing paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management 33(3): 219–232.10.1080/03088830600783137Search in Google Scholar

7. Homsombat, W.; Yip, T.L.; Yang, H.; Fu, X. (2013) Regional cooperation and management of port pollution. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 451–466.10.1080/03088839.2013.797118Search in Google Scholar

8. Julian, M. (2000) MARPOL 73/78: the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. Maritime Studies 2000(113): 16–23.10.1080/07266472.2000.10878605Search in Google Scholar

9. Klopott, M. (2013) Restructuring of environmental management in Baltic ports: case of Poland. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 439–450.10.1080/03088839.2013.798440Search in Google Scholar

10. Luo, M.; Yip, T.L. (2013) Ports and the environment. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 401–403.10.1080/03088839.2013.797122Search in Google Scholar

11. Mattson, G. (2006) MARPOL 73/78 and Annex I: An Assessment of its Effectiveness. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 9(2): 175–194.10.1080/13880290600728195Search in Google Scholar

12. Moon, D.S.-H.; Woo, J.K. (2014) The impact of port operations on efficient ship operation from both economic and environmental perspectives. Maritime Policy & Management 41(5): 444–461.10.1080/03088839.2014.931607Search in Google Scholar

13. Panasiuk, I.; Lebedevas, S. (2014) The assessment of the possibilities for the Lithuanian fleet to comply with new environmental requirements. Transport 29(1): 50–58.10.3846/16484142.2014.896828Search in Google Scholar

14. Project CLEANSHIP (Clean Baltic Sea Shipping) report DEMAND STUDY PORT INFRASTRUCTURE, funded under Baltic Sea Programme 2007-2013.Search in Google Scholar

15. Venus Lun, Y.H.; Lai K-H.; Christina W.Y.; Cheng T.C.E. (2014) Green shipping practices and firm performance. Journal: Maritime Policy & Management 41(2): 134–148.Search in Google Scholar

16. Zondag, B.; Bucci, P.; Gützkow, P.; de Jong, G. (2010) Port competition modelling including maritime, port, and hinterland characteristics. Maritime Policy & Management 37(3): 179–194.10.1080/03088831003700579Search in Google Scholar