1. bookTom 17 (2016): Zeszyt 1 (March 2016)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1407-6179
Pierwsze wydanie
20 Mar 2000
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

A Comparison of Alternative Ordered Response Models for Analysing User Satisfaction with Transport Services in Turkey

Data publikacji: 22 Feb 2016
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 17 (2016) - Zeszyt 1 (March 2016)
Zakres stron: 40 - 54
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1407-6179
Pierwsze wydanie
20 Mar 2000
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

1. Al-Atawi, A. and Saleh, W. (2014) Travel behaviour in Saudi Arabia and the role of social factors. Transport, 29(3), 269-277. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.91319910.3846/16484142.2014.913199Search in Google Scholar

2. Beirão, G. and Sarfield Cabral, J. A. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478-489. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.00910.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009Search in Google Scholar

3. Borooah, V. K. (2002) Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multinomial Models. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412984829Search in Google Scholar

4. Brant, R. (1990). Assessing probability in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46(4), 1171-1178. DOI: 10.2307/253245710.2307/2532457Search in Google Scholar

5. Cascetta, E. and Cartenì, A. (2014) A quality-based approach to public transportation planning: Theory and a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 84-106. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.75853210.1080/15568318.2012.758532Search in Google Scholar

6. Celik, E., Aydin, N. and Taskin Gumus, A. (2014) A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transport Policy, 36, 283-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.00510.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.005Search in Google Scholar

7. Celik, E., Bilisik, O. N., Erdogan, M., Taskin Gumus, A. and Baracli, H. (2013) An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 58, 28-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.06.00610.1016/j.tre.2013.06.006Search in Google Scholar

8. Cirillo, C., Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2014) On the asymmetric user perception of transit service quality. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5(4), 216-232. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2010.49423110.1080/15568318.2010.494231Search in Google Scholar

9. Cirit, F. (2014) Sustainable urban transport policies and comparison of mass transit systems, Planning expertise thesis, General Directorate of Economic sectors and Coordination, Turkish Ministry of Development.Search in Google Scholar

10. dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A. and Cecín, P. (2010) Modelling user perception of bus transit quality. Transport Policy, 17(6), 388-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.00610.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.006Search in Google Scholar

11. De Oña, R., Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2014) Key factors affecting rail service quality in the Northern Italy: a decision tree approach. Transport, 29(1), 75-83. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.89821610.3846/16484142.2014.898216Search in Google Scholar

12. Diana, M. (2012) Measuring the satisfaction of multimodal travelers for local transit services in different urban context. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.01810.1016/j.tra.2011.09.018Search in Google Scholar

13. Dölarslan, E. S. (2014) Assessing the effects of satisfaction and value on customer loyalty behaviors in service environments: High-speed railway in Turkey as a case study. Management Review Research, 37(8), 706-727. DOI: .1108/MRR-06-2013-015210.1108/MRR-06-2013-0152Search in Google Scholar

14. Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2007) Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 10(3), 21-34. Retrieved from http://www.nctr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/JPT-10-3-Eboli.pdf10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.2Search in Google Scholar

15. Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2011) A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transport Policy, 18(1), 172-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.00710.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007Search in Google Scholar

16. Feng, C. M. and Hsieh, C. H. (2009) Implications of transport diversity for quality of life. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(1), 13-18. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(13)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(13)Search in Google Scholar

17. Fu, V. (1998). Estimating generalized ordered logit models. Stata Technical Bulletin, 44, 27-30. Stata technical bulletin reprints, Vol. 8, College Station, Tex.: Stata Press, 160-164. Retrieved from http://stata-press.com/journals/stbcontents/stb44.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

18. Filipović, S., Tica, S., Živanović, P. and Milovanović, B. (2009) Comparative analysis of the basic features of the expected and perceived quality of mass passenger public transport service in Belgrade. Transport, 24(4), 265-273. DOI: 10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.265-27310.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.265-273Search in Google Scholar

19. Garrido, C., de Oña, R. and de Oña, J. (2014) Neural networks for analyzing service quality in public transportation. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(15), 6830-6838. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.04510.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045Search in Google Scholar

20. Grujičić, D., Ivanović, I., Jović, J. and Đorić, V. (2014). Customer perception of service quality in public transport. Transport, 29(3), 285-295. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.95168510.3846/16484142.2014.951685Search in Google Scholar

21. Gulhan, G., Ceylan, H., Baskan, O. and Ceylan, H. (2014) Using potential accessibility measure for urban public transportation planning: A case study of Denizli, Turkey. PrometTraffic & Transportation, 26(2), 129-137. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v26i2.123810.7307/ptt.v26i2.1238Search in Google Scholar

22. Fiorio, C. V., Florio, M. and Perucca, G. (2013) User satisfaction and the organization of local public transport: Evidence from European cities. Transport Policy, 29, 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.06.00410.1016/j.tranpol.2013.06.004Search in Google Scholar

23. Haldenbilen, S. (2003). Evaluation of sustainable transport indicators for Turkey based on genetic algorithm approach, PhD thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Pamukkale University, Denizli (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

24. Haldenbilen, S. and Ceylan, H. (2005) Transport demand management in Turkey: A genetic algorithm approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, 28(6), 403-426. DOI: 10.1080/0308106050051550710.1080/03081060500515507Search in Google Scholar

25. Jain, S., Aggarwal, P., Kumar, P., Singhal, S. and Sharma, P. (2014) Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 60-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.00710.1016/j.trf.2014.03.007Search in Google Scholar

26. Kroesen, M. (2014). Modeling the behavioral determinants of travel behavior: An application of latent transition analysis. Transport Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 65, 56-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.01010.1016/j.tra.2014.04.010Search in Google Scholar

27. Lai, W. T. and Chen, C. F. (2011) Behavioral intentions of public transit passenger–The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transport Policy, 18(2), 318-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.00310.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.003Search in Google Scholar

28. Litman, T. (2011) Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, BC, Canada. Available from http://www.vtpi.org/sus_tran_ind.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

29. Litman, T. (2014) Well measured: Developing indicators for sustainable and livable transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, BC, Canada. Available from http://www.vtpi.org/wellmeas.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

30. Long, J. S. and Freese, J. 2001. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.Search in Google Scholar

31. May, A. D. (2013) Urban transport and sustainability: The key challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(3), 170-185. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2013.71013610.1080/15568318.2013.710136Search in Google Scholar

32. Mokonyama, M. and Venter, C. (2013) Incorporation of customer satisfaction in public transport contracts – A preliminary analysis. Research in Transportation Economics, 39(1), 58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.02410.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.024Search in Google Scholar

33. Pantouvakis, A. and Lymperopoulos, K. (2008) Customer satisfaction and loyalty in the eyes of new and repeat customers. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 18(6), 623-643. DOI: 10.1108/0960452081092010310.1108/09604520810920103Search in Google Scholar

34. Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Titheridge, H., Preston, J., Wardman, M., Shires, J. and White, P. (2006) The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy, 13(4), 295-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.00410.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.004Search in Google Scholar

35. Powers, D. A. and Xie, Y. (2000) Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. San Diego, California: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012563736-7/50005-7Search in Google Scholar

36. Quddus, M. A., Wang, C. and Ison, S. G. (2010) Road traffic congestion and crash severity: Econometric analysis using ordered response models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136(5), 424-435. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000004410.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000044Search in Google Scholar

37. Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T. and Hartig, T. (2013) Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.00510.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005Search in Google Scholar

38. Román, C., Martín, J. C. and Espino, R. (2014) Using stated preferences to analyze the service quality of public transport. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 28-46. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.75846010.1080/15568318.2012.758460Search in Google Scholar

39. Shay, E. and Khattak, A. J. (2010) Toward sustainable transport: Conventional and disruptive approaches in the US context. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4(1), 14-40. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.75852310.1080/15568318.2012.758523Search in Google Scholar

40. Stathopoulos, A. and Marcucci, E. (2014) De gustibus disputandum est: Non-linearity in public transportation service quality evaluation. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 47-68. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.75852310.1080/15568318.2012.758523Search in Google Scholar

41. Steg, L. and Gifford, R. (2005) Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.00310.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.003Search in Google Scholar

42. St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D. and El-Geneidy, A. (2014) The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 160-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.00410.1016/j.trf.2014.07.004Search in Google Scholar

43. Too, L. and Earl, G. (2010) Public transport service quality and sustainable development: a community stakeholder perspective. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 51-61. DOI: 10.1002/sd.41210.1002/sd.412Search in Google Scholar

44. Tyrinopoulos, Y. and Antoniou, C. (2008). Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications, Transport Policy, 15(4), 260-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.00210.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar

45. Turkish General Directorate of State Airports Authority. (2014a) 2013 Annual report. Ankara: Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

46. Turkish General Directorate of State Airports Authority. (2014b) Passenger traffic (arrival-departure). Ankara: Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

47. Turkish Ministry of Development. (2012) Turkey’s sustainable development report: Claiming the future, 2012. Ankara: Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

48. Turkish Ministry of Transport. (2010). Türkiye ulaşım ve iletişim stratejisi: Hedef 2023. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

49. Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications. (2013a) Ulaşan ve erişen Türkiye, 2013. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

50. Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications. (2013b) İstatistiklerle ulaştırma denizcilik ve haberleşme. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

51. TurkStat. (2012) 2011 Life Satisfaction Survey dataset. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara: Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

52. TurkStat. (2013) 2013 Life Satisfaction Survey dataset. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara: Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

53. TurkStat. (2014a) Motorlu kara yaşıtları haber bülteni, Ağustos 2014. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish)Search in Google Scholar

54. TurkStat. (2014b) The number of freights and passengers in local ports. Ankara: Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

55. Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G. and Mannering, F. L. (2003) Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. .10.1201/9780203497111Search in Google Scholar

56. Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58-82. Retrieved from http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st009710.1177/1536867X0600600104Search in Google Scholar

57. Williams, R. (2010) Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm, The Stata Journal, 10(4), 540-567. Retrieved from http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0208Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo