[Almăşan, A. (2017). The Arbitrability of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. In A. Almăşan, P. Whelan (Eds.), The Consistent Application of EU Competition Law: Substantive and Procedural Challenges. Cham: Springer, 141–161.10.1007/978-3-319-47382-6_8]Search in Google Scholar
[Basedow, J., Francq, S. & Idot, L. (2012). International Antitrust Litigation: Conflict of Laws and Coordination. Oxford–Portland: Hart Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Commission Recommendation of 11 June 2013 on common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms in the Member States concerning violations of rights granted under Union Law (OJ L 201, 26.07.2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Commission Staff Working Document – Practical guide “Quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union” (C (2013) 3440, 11.06.2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Communication from the Commission on quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 167, 13.06.2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Conway, G. (2015). EU Law. London–New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315708256]Search in Google Scholar
[Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (OJ L 349, 5.12.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[EEC Council Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ 17, 6.10.1958)]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2017). Transposition of the Directive in Member States. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/actionsdamages/directive_en.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Supreme Court of Poland of 22 July 2008, II PK 360/07, published in Lex No. 500212.]Search in Google Scholar
[Modzelewska de Raad, M. (2017). Consensual Dispute Resolution in the Damages Directive: Implementation in CEE Countries. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 10(15), forthcoming.10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.15.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Pais, S.O. & Piszcz, A. (2014). Package on Actions for Damages Based on Breaches of EU Competition Rules: Can One Size Fit All? Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 7(10), 209–234.10.2139/ssrn.2741618]Search in Google Scholar
[Pärn-Lee, E. (2017). In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 109–125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Petr, M. (2017). The Scope of Implementation of the Damages Directive in CEE States. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 10(15), forthcoming.10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.15.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Piszcz, A. (2013). A few notes on the language of EU antitrust law in English-Polish translation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 34(47) [DOI: 10.2478/slgr-2013-0028], 161–174.10.2478/slgr-2013-0028],161174]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Piszcz, A. (2016). Is this really a reform to facilitate follow-on actions for antitrust damages? Some thoughts on the Damages Directive. In S.O. Pais (Ed.), Competition law challenges in the next decade. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang, 59–73.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piszcz, A. (2015). Piecemeal Harmonisation Through the Damages Directive? Remarks on What Received Too Little Attention in Relation to Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 8(12), 79–98.10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2015.8.12.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Piszcz, A. (2017). Quo vadis CEE? Summary. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 297–307.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piszcz, A. (2017a). Well Begun Is Half Done: Amendments to the Polish Legal Framework for Consensual Dispute Resolution Needed After Antitrust Damages Directive (2014/104/EU). Białystok Legal Studies 22(2), forthcoming.10.15290/bsp.2017.22.04.19]Search in Google Scholar
[Piszcz, A. & Wolski, D. (2017). Poland. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 211–236.]Search in Google Scholar
[Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (COM (2013) 404 final, 11.06.2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Robertson, C. (2013). How the European Union functions in 23 languages. Synaps 28, 14–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simonsson, I. (2010). Legitimacy in EU Cartel Control. Oxford–Portland: Hart Publishing.10.5040/9781472560711]Search in Google Scholar
[Strand, M. (2016). Beyond the Competition Damages Directive: What Room for Competition Law Restitution? In M. Bergström, M. Iacovides, M. Strand (Eds.), Harmonising EU Competition Litigation: The New Directive and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 279–294.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strand, M. (2017). The Passing-On Problem in Damages and Restitution Under EU Law. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781786430182]Search in Google Scholar
[Tabory, M. (1980). Multilingualism in International Law and Institutions. Alphen aan den Rijn: Brill Archive.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tokarczyk, R. (2008). Komparatystyka prawnicza. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turi, J.-G. (2012). Language Law and Language Rights, International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse, 2(4), 1–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ustawa z 17 listopada 1964 r. – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2016 r., poz. 1822, z poźn. zm.).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ustawa z 21 kwietnia 2017 r. o roszczeniach o naprawienie szkody wyrządzonej przez naruszenie prawa konkurencji (Dz.U. z 2017 r., poz. 1132).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ustawa z 23 kwietnia 1964 r. – Kodeks cywilny (tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2017 r., poz. 459, z poźn. zm.).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ustawa z 23 września 2016 r. o pozasądowymrozwiązywaniu sporów konsumenckich (Dz.U. z 2016 r., poz. 1823).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlahek, A. & Podobnik, K. (2017). Slovenia. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 263–296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wijckmans, F., Visser, M., Jaques, S. & Noël, E. (2015). The EU Private Damages Directive – Practical Insights. Minutes of the Closed Workshop 2015. Cambridge–Antwerp–Portland: Intersentia.]Search in Google Scholar