How “Meaning” became “Narrow Content”

Ajdukiewicz, K. (1978). Language and Meaning. In J. Giedymin (Ed.), The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays, 1931–1963. (pp. 35–66). Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, K. (1998). Content: Wide vs narrow. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London; New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, L. (1987). Content by Courtesy. Journal of Philosophy 1, 84, 197–213.10.2307/2027158Search in Google Scholar

Block, N. (1986). Advertisement for a semantics for psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 10(1), 615–678.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1987.tb00558.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brown, C. (1993). Belief States and Narrow Content. Mind and Language, 8(3), 343–67.10.1111/j.1468-0017.1993.tb00290.xSearch in Google Scholar

Carruthers, P., & Botterill, G. (1999). The philosophy of psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. (2003). The Nature of Narrow Content. Philosophical Issues, 13(1), 46–66.10.1111/1533-6077.00004Search in Google Scholar

Crane, T. (1991). All the difference in the world. The Philosophical Quarterly, 41(162), 1–25.10.2307/2219783Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1987). Knowing One’s Own Mind. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 60(3), 441–458.10.2307/3131782Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1980). Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, (3), 63–73.10.1017/S0140525X00001771Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics. Cambridge M.A.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5684.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1994). The elm and the expert: mentalese and its semantics. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Francescotti, R. (1999). How to define intrinsic properties. Nous, 33(4), 590–609.10.1111/0029-4624.00195Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1980). Function and Concept. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grabarczyk, P. (2016), “Concepts as soft detectors – On the role concepts play in perception”, New Ideas in Psychology, Vol 40, Part A.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, F., & Pettit, P. (1993). Some content is narrow. In J. Heil & R. Mele, Alfred (Eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jacob, P. (1990). Externalism revisited: Is there such a thing as narrow content? Philosophical Studies, 60, 143–176.10.1007/BF00367468Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. (1982). Psychophysical supervenience. Philosophical Studies, 41, 51–70.10.1007/BF00353523Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. (Ed.). (1993). Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625220Search in Google Scholar

Kriegel, U. (2008). Real Narrow Content. Mind and Language, (23), 305–328.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00345.xSearch in Google Scholar

Loar, B. (1981). Mind and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Loar, B. (1988). Social content and psychological content. In R. Grimm & P. Merrill (Eds.), Contents of Thought. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Search in Google Scholar

Machery, E. (2011). Doing without concepts. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Doing-without-Concepts-Edouard-Machery/dp/0199837562Search in Google Scholar

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the Representational Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ramsey, W. (2010). Representation reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (1994). How narrow is narrow content? Dialectica, 48(3/4), 209–229.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1994.tb00147.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rey, G. (1998). A narrow representationalist account of qualitative experience. Philosophical Perspectives, 12, 435–57.Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, S. (2007). There is no viable notion of narrow content. In B. P. McLaughlin & J. D. Cohen (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Segal, G. (2000). A slim book about narrow content. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6275.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. (1990). Narrow content. In C. A. Anderson & J. Owens (Eds.), Propositional Attitudes. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Stich, S. (1991). Narrow Content Meets Fat Syntax. In B. Loewer & G. Rey (Eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics (pp. 239–54). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar