<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Does a high degree of confirmation make an inductive argument valid? I will argue that it depends on the kind of question to which the argument is meant to be providing an answer. We should distinguish inductive generalization from inductive extrapolation even in cases where they might appear to have the same answer, and also from confirmation of a hypothesis.</p></abstract>

Does a high degree of confirmation make an inductive argument valid? I will argue that it depends on the kind of question to which the argument is meant to be providing an answer. We should distinguish inductive generalization from inductive extrapolation even in cases where they might appear to have the same answer, and also from confirmation of a hypothesis.

High Confirmation and Inductive Validity

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"High Confirmation and Inductive Validity"}

Does a high degree of confirmation make an inductive argument valid? I will argue that it depends on the kind of question to which the argument is meant to be...

High Confirmation and Inductive Validity

Data publikacji: 23 lis 2016

Zakres stron: 119 - 142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0036

Słowa kluczowe
probability, inductive generalization, inductive validity, confirmation

© 2016 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

High Confirmation and Inductive Validity

Data publikacji: 23 lis 2016

Zakres stron: 119 - 142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0036

Słowa kluczoweprobability, inductive generalization, inductive validity, confirmation

© 2016 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
probability, inductive generalization, inductive validity, confirmation