[Arsenijevic, B. and W. Hinzen 2012. On the absence of X-within-X recursion in Human Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 43:3, 423–440.10.1162/LING_a_00095]Search in Google Scholar
[Boeckx, C. & N. Hornstein 2007. Control in Icelandic and theories of control. 2006. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 591–606.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cardinaletti, A. & M. Starke 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.) Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton, 145–233.10.1515/9783110804010.145]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, Holland; Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland and H.-M. Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View From Syntax-Semantics. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Déchaine, R. M. & M. Wiltschko 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.10.1162/002438902760168554]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitch, T. 2010. The evolution of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haddad, Y. A. 2012, Control, Binding, and the Statue vs. Identity Interpretation, Tampa Papers in Linguistics vol 3, 67–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hauser, M. D. 1996. The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinzen, W. 2006. Mind Design and Minimal Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289257.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinzen, W. 2007. An Essay on Naming and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinzen, W. and M. Sheehan 2013. The philosophy of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, in press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654833.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinzen, W. 2015. The case against predicativism. Philosophy Compass, to appear.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hornstein, N. 2001. Move! Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, D. 1977/1989. Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (Eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 481–563.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kemmerer, D. 2014. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Language: An Introduction. Psychology Press.10.4324/9781315764061]Search in Google Scholar
[Longobardi, G. 1994. Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665.]Search in Google Scholar
[Longobardi, G. 2001. How Comparative Is Semantics? In Natural Language Semantics 9: 335–369.10.1023/A:1014861111123]Search in Google Scholar
[Longobardi, G. 2005. Toward a unified grammar of reference. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 24: 5–44.10.1515/zfsw.2005.24.1.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Longobardi, G. 2008. Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In H. H. Mueller & A. Klinge, eds. Essays on nominal determination. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins, 189–211.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martín, Tx. 2012. Deconstructing Catalan Object Clitics. PhD Thesis: New York University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martín, Tx & W. Hinzen 2013. The grammar of the essential indexical. Lingua, 148, 95–117.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Moltmann, F. 2013. Identificational sentences. Nat Lang Semantics 21:43–77.10.1007/s11050-012-9091-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Moro, A. 1997. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519956]Search in Google Scholar
[Reuland, E. 2011a. Anaphora and Language Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0050]Search in Google Scholar
[Reuland, E. 2011b. Syntax and Interpretation Systems: How is their labour Divided? In C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (pp. 377–396). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sheehan, M. & W. Hinzen 2011. Moving towards the edge. Linguistic Analysis 37:405–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomasello, M. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar