<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> Where do the rules of critical discussion get their normative force? What kinds of norms are involved? Unreasonable behaviour in the critical discussion - e.g., continuing to assert the contradictory of a proven standpoint, performing some action pragmatically inconsistent with a proven standpoint, or the same with regard to the starting-points agreed to in the opening stage - is liable to moral sanction. Thus, a moral/ethical norm is involved and the rules must have a moral force. Pragma-dialectics as it stands does not seem to account for this moral force. I will attempt to fill this gap in pragma-dialectical theory.</p></abstract>

Where do the rules of critical discussion get their normative force? What kinds of norms are involved? Unreasonable behaviour in the critical discussion - e.g., continuing to assert the contradictory of a proven standpoint, performing some action pragmatically inconsistent with a proven standpoint, or the same with regard to the starting-points agreed to in the opening stage - is liable to moral sanction. Thus, a moral/ethical norm is involved and the rules must have a moral force. Pragma-dialectics as it stands does not seem to account for this moral force. I will attempt to fill this gap in pragma-dialectical theory.

Being Reasonable

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

{"article-title":"Being Reasonable"}

Where do the rules of critical discussion get their normative force? What kinds of norms are involved? Unreasonable behaviour in the critical discussion -...

Being Reasonable

Data publikacji: 26 lis 2015

Zakres stron: 17 - 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0028

Słowa kluczowe
pragma-dialectics, normativity, strategic maneuvering, collective intentionality, co-operation

© Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Being Reasonable

Data publikacji: 26 lis 2015

Zakres stron: 17 - 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0028

Słowa kluczowepragma-dialectics, normativity, strategic maneuvering, collective intentionality, co-operation

© Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
pragma-dialectics, normativity, strategic maneuvering, collective intentionality, co-operation