<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><sec id="j_sjph-2017-0004_s_333_w2aab3b8c39b1b7b1aab1c15b1Aa"><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The identification of patients infected and/or colonised by methicillin resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (MRSA) is necessary for the timely introduction of measures for infection control. We compared the diagnostic efficacy of combinations of MRSA surveillance swabs routinely taken by health institutions in the country.</p></sec><sec id="j_sjph-2017-0004_s_334_w2aab3b8c39b1b7b1aab1c15b2Aa"><h3>Methods</h3><p>All surveillance samples, which were sent for a microbiological analysis to detect MRSA with the culture method in 2014, in the three departments for medical microbiology of the National Laboratory for Health, Environment and Food, were included in this study.</p></sec><sec id="j_sjph-2017-0004_s_335_w2aab3b8c39b1b7b1aab1c15b3Aa"><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 65,251 surveillance cultures from 13,274 persons, 1,233 (2.1%) were positive (490 positive persons). Prevailing positive surveillance cultures were throat swabs (31.3%), followed by nose swab (31.2%), skin swab (18.9%), perineum (16.4%) and wound swabs (1.4%). The contribution of other samples, such as aspirate, urine and excreta, was under 1%. We found no statistically significant differences in the frequency of detection of a positive patient, if the combination of samples NTS (nose, throat, skin) or NTP (nose, throat, perineum) was analysed. However, statistically significant differences were confirmed when any of the anatomic sites would be omitted from the sets of NTP and NTS (chi square; p&lt;0.01). Adding additional samples resulted in only 24 additional positive patients (4.9%).</p></sec><sec id="j_sjph-2017-0004_s_336_w2aab3b8c39b1b7b1aab1c15b4Aa"><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results indicate that increasing the number of surveillance cultures above three does not add much to the sensitivity of MRSA surveillance, the exception could be wound. The swabs from the perineum and from the skin are exchangeable.</p></sec></abstract>

IntroductionThe identification of patients infected and/or colonised by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is necessary for the timely introduction of measures for infection control. We compared the diagnostic efficacy of combinations of MRSA surveillance swabs routinely taken by health institutions in the country.MethodsAll surveillance samples, which were sent for a microbiological analysis to detect MRSA with the culture method in 2014, in the three departments for medical microbiology of the National Laboratory for Health, Environment and Food, were included in this study.ResultsAmong 65,251 surveillance cultures from 13,274 persons, 1,233 (2.1%) were positive (490 positive persons). Prevailing positive surveillance cultures were throat swabs (31.3%), followed by nose swab (31.2%), skin swab (18.9%), perineum (16.4%) and wound swabs (1.4%). The contribution of other samples, such as aspirate, urine and excreta, was under 1%. We found no statistically significant differences in the frequency of detection of a positive patient, if the combination of samples NTS (nose, throat, skin) or NTP (nose, throat, perineum) was analysed. However, statistically significant differences were confirmed when any of the anatomic sites would be omitted from the sets of NTP and NTS (chi square; p<0.01). Adding additional samples resulted in only 24 additional positive patients (4.9%).ConclusionsThe results indicate that increasing the number of surveillance cultures above three does not add much to the sensitivity of MRSA surveillance, the exception could be wound. The swabs from the perineum and from the skin are exchangeable.

The evaluation of MRSA surveillance cultures by the number and combinations of anatomical sites

National Laboratory for Health, Environment and Food, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Prvomajska 1, 2000 Maribor,

Slovenian Journal of Public Health

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

VREDNOTENJE NADZORNIH KUŽNIN NA MRSA PO ŠTEVILU IN MESTU ODVZEMA

IntroductionThe identification of patients infected and/or colonised by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is necessary for the timely...

The evaluation of MRSA surveillance cultures by the number and combinations of anatomical sites

Article Category: Original scientific article

Data publikacji: 28 lip 2016

Zakres stron: 24 - 30

Otrzymano: 27 lis 2015

Przyjęty: 31 maj 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjph-2017-0004

Słowa kluczowe
surveillance sample, MRSA, MRSA control, meticillin-resistant,

© National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The evaluation of MRSA surveillance cultures by the number and combinations of anatomical sites

Article Category: Original scientific article

Data publikacji: 28 lip 2016

Zakres stron: 24 - 30

Otrzymano: 27 lis 2015

Przyjęty: 31 maj 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjph-2017-0004

Słowa kluczowesurveillance sample, MRSA, MRSA control, meticillin-resistant,

© National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
surveillance sample, MRSA, MRSA control, meticillin-resistant,