[ANON. (2006): New Zealand Forest Industry Facts and Figures 2005/2006. New Zealand Forest Owners Association, Wellington, New Zealand. www.nzfoa.org.nz or www.nzforestry.co.nz.]Search in Google Scholar
[BALL, R. D. (2001): Bayesian methods for quantitative trait loci mapping based on model selection: approximate analysis using the Bayesian Information Criterion. Genetics 159: 1351-1364. 10.1093/genetics/159.3.1351]Search in Google Scholar
[BLOUIN, M. S. (2003): DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 503-511.10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00225-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[BORRALHO, N. M. G and G. W. DUTKOWSKI (1998): Comparison of rolling front and discrete generation breeding strategies for trees. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 28: 987-993. 10.1139/x98-075]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[BURDON, R. D. (1971): Clonal repeatabilities and clone-site interaction in Pinus radiata. Silvae Genetica 20: 33-39. ]Search in Google Scholar
[BURDON, R. D. (2008a): Breeding radiata pine - historical overview. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 52: 4-6. ]Search in Google Scholar
[BURDON, R. D. (2008b): Branching habit in radiata pine - breeding goals revisited. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 52: 20-23. ]Search in Google Scholar
[BURDON, R. D. and G. NAMKOONG (1983): Multiple populations and sublines. Silvae Genetica 32: 221-222. ]Search in Google Scholar
[BURDON, R. D. and J. T. MILLER (1992): Introduced forest trees in New Zealand: recognition, role and seed source. 12. Radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don). New Zealand Forest Research Institute Bulletin 124/12.]Search in Google Scholar
[BURDON, R. D., S. O. HONG and C. J. A. SHELBOURNE (1997): Progeny x site interaction in Pinus radiata on nine sites involving three countries, In: Proceedings of the New Zealand forest Research Institute - IUFRO conference: IUFRO 1997 Genetics of Radiata Pine, 1-4 December 1997, ROTORUA, N. Z., R. D. BURDON and J. M. MOORE (Eds.). New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, N. Z.. 354p. (pp 226-230). ]Search in Google Scholar
[CARSON, M. J. (1986): Control-pollinated seed orchards of best general combiners - a new strategy for radiata pine improvement: In: Proceedings of the Plant Breeding Symposium, DSIR, Lincoln, New Zealand, 17-20 February 1986. Agronomy Society of New Zealand Special Publication No. 5. T. A. WILLIAMS and G. S. WRATT (Eds.). 382p. (pp 144-148).]Search in Google Scholar
[CARSON, S. D. (1991): Genotype x environment interaction and optimal number of progeny test sites for improving Pinus radiata in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 21: 32-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[CARSON, S. D. and M. J. CARSON (1986): A breed of radiata pine resistant to Dothistroma needle blight. In: Plant Breeding Symposium DSIR. Agronomy Society of New Zealand Special Publication No. 5. T. A. WILLIAMS and G. S. WRATT (Eds.). 382p. (pp 202-207).]Search in Google Scholar
[COTTERILL, P. (1986): Breeding strategy: don’t underestimate simplicity. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO conference on breeding theory, progeny testing and seed orchards October 13-17, WILLIAMSBURG, V. A., USA. (pp 8-23).]Search in Google Scholar
[COTTERILL, P. (1989): The nucleus breeding system. Proceedings of the Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference. 20: 36-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[COTTERILL, P. P., C. A. DEAN, J. CAMERON and M. BRINDBERGS (1989): Nucleus breeding: a new strategy for rapid improvement under clonal forestry. In: Breeding tropical trees: population structure and genetic improvement strategies in clonal and seedling forestry; Proceedings of a conference held in Pattaya, Thailand, 28 November-3 December 1988. G. L. GIBSON, A. R. GRIFFIN, A. C. MATHESON (Eds.). Winrock International, Arlington. 503p. (pp 39-51).]Search in Google Scholar
[DANUSEVICIUS, D. and D. LINDGREN (2002): Efficiency of selection based on phenotype, clone and progeny testing in long-term breeding. Silvae Genetica 51: 19-26. ]Search in Google Scholar
[DANUSEVICIUS, D. and D. LINDGREN (2005): Optimization of breeding population size for long-term breeding. Scandanavian Journal of Forest Research 20: 18-25. 10.1080/02827580410019517]Search in Google Scholar
[DICK, M. A. (1998): Pine pitch canker - the threat to New Zealand. New Zealand Forestry, 42: 30-34.]Search in Google Scholar
[HANOCQ, E., D. BOICHARD and J. L. FOULLEY (1996): A simulation study of the effect of connectedness on genetic trend. Genetics Selection Evolution, 28: 37-82.10.1186/1297-9686-28-1-67]Search in Google Scholar
[JAYAWICKRAMA, K. J. S. and M. J. CARSON (2000): A breeding strategy for the New Zealand Radiata Pine Breeding Cooperative. Silvae Genetica 49 (2): 82-90. ]Search in Google Scholar
[JAYAWICKRAMA, K. J. S. (2001): Genetic parameter estimates for radiata pine in New Zealand and New South Wales: A synthesis of results. Silvae Genetica 50: 45-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[JEFFERSON, P. J. (2005): Report on structure of RPBC elite and main breeding populations. Status at 30 March 2005. Confidential report to the Radiata Pine Breeding Consortium No. 170. 115pp. ]Search in Google Scholar
[JEFFERSON, P. A. and S. WEAVER (1997): Gains from clonal testing in the breeding population. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand forest Research Institute - IUFRO conference: IUFRO 1997 Genetics of Radiata Pine, 1-4 December 1997, ROTORUA, N. Z., R. D. BURDON and J. M. MOORE (Eds.). New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, N. Z.. 354p. (pp 226-230).]Search in Google Scholar
[JOHNSON, I. G., I. M. COTTERILL, C. A. RAYMOND and M. HENSON (2008): Half a century of Pinus radiata tree improvement in New South Wales. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 52: 7-13. ]Search in Google Scholar
[KING, J. N., M. J. CARSON and G. R. JOHNSON (1998): Analysis of disconnected diallel mating designs II - results from a third generation progeny test of the New Zealand radiata pine improvement programme. Silvae Genetica 47: 61-76.]Search in Google Scholar
[KUEHN, L. A. (2005): Implications for connectedness in the genetic evaluation of livestock. PhD. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. Pp121. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11182005-153403/unrestricted/Kuehn_Final_Dissertation.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[KUMAR, S. (2006): Correlation between clonal means and OP seedling progeny means, and its implications for radiata pine breeding strategy. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1968-1975.10.1139/x06-082]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[KUMAR, S. and T. E. RICHARDSON (2005): Inferring relatedness and heritability using molecular markers in radiata pine. Molecular Breeding 15: 55-64. 10.1007/s11032-004-2059-4]Search in Google Scholar
[KUMAR, S., R. J. SPELLMAN, D. J. GARRICK, T. E RICHARDSON, M. LAUSBERG and P. L. WILCOX (2000): Multiple marker mapping of wood density loci in an outbred pedigree of radiata pine Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 926-933.10.1007/s001220051372]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[KUMAR, S., C. L. ECHT, P. L. WILCOX and T. E. RICHARDSON (2004a): Testing for linkage disequilibrium in the New Zealand radiata pine breeding population Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 292-298.10.1007/s00122-003-1352-712898020]Search in Google Scholar
[KUMAR, S. (2004b) Genetic parameter estimates for wood stiffness, strength internal checking and resin bleeding for radiata pine Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 34: 2601-2610.10.1139/x04-128]Search in Google Scholar
[KUMAR, S., S. GERBER, T. E. RICHARDSON and L. GEA (2005): Testing for non-random contribution of pollens using nuclear- and chloroplast SSR markers in polycross families of Pinus radiata D. Don. Tree Genetics and Genomes DOI 10.1007/s11295-006-0056-y. http://10.1007/s11295-006-0056-y.http:/]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/11295/2007/00000003/00000003/00000056?token=004b190ee3d3b39dd6e586546244044425520355d7d703b70455e4e6b6340be2662c5dcdfb9.]Search in Google Scholar
[LALOË, D., F. PHOCAS and F. MËNISSIER (1996): Considerations on measures of precision and connectedness in mixed linear models of genetic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution, 28: 359-378.10.1186/1297-9686-28-4-359]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LAMBETH, C, B.-C. LEE, D. O’MALLEY and N. WHEELER (2001): Polymix breeding with parental analysis of progeny: an alternative to full-sib breeding and testing. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 930-943.10.1007/s001220100627]Search in Google Scholar
[LAVERY, P. B. and D. J. MEAD (1998): Pinus radiata: a narrow endemic from North America takes on the world. In: Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. D. M. RICHARDSON (Ed.). University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 527 p. (pp 432-439).]Search in Google Scholar
[LINDGREN, D., L. GEA and P. JEFFERSON (1996): Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genetica 45: 52-59. ]Search in Google Scholar
[LSTIBÜREK, M., T. J. MULLIN, D. LINDGREN and O. ROSSVALL (2004a): Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared with population-wide positive assortative mating. I. Equal distribution of testing effort. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 1196-1203. 10.1007/s00122-004-1746-1]Search in Google Scholar
[LSTIBÜREK, M., T. J. MULLIN, D. LINDGREN and O. ROSSVALL (2004b): Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared with population-wide positive assortative mating. II. Unequal distribution of testing effort. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 1169-1177. DOI 10.1007/s00122-004-1737-2. http://openurl.ingenta.com/content?genre=article&issn=0040-5752&volume=109&issue=6&spage=1169&epage=1177. 10.1007/s00122-004-1737-2.http://openurl.ingenta.com/content?genre=article&issn=0040-5752&volume=109&issue=6&spage=1169&epage=1177]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LSTIBÜREK, M., T. J. MULLIN, Y. A. EL-KASSABY (2006): The impact of differential success of somatic embryogenesis on the outcome of clonal forestry programs. I. Initial comparison under multi-trait selection. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1376-1384.10.1139/x06-036]Search in Google Scholar
[MACHALOVICH, M. F. and F. E. BRIDGWATER (1989): Modelling elite populations and positive assortative mating in recurrent selection programs for general combining ability. In: Proceedings of the 20th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Charleston, S. C., USA, 26-30 June 1989. Macon, USA: Southern Forest Tree Improvement Committee. 442p. (pp 43-49). ]Search in Google Scholar
[MCKEAND, S. E. and F. W. BRIDGWATER (1998): A strategy for the third breeding sycle of loblolly pine in the southeastern U.S. Silvae Genetica 47: 223-234. ]Search in Google Scholar
[MARK, T. and P. MASDEN (2002): Bayesian MACE for Eyreshire confirmation traits. http://www-interbull.slu.se/bulletins/bulletin29/Mark.pdf 6pp. ]Search in Google Scholar
[MATHUR, P. K., B. J. SULLIVAN and J. P. CHESNAIS (2002): Measuring connectedness: concept and application to a large industry breeding programs in Proceedings of 7th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 32: 545-548. ]Search in Google Scholar
[ORMSBY, M. (2004): Pitch canker in quarantine - a biosecurity success story. Biosecurity 51: 10. ]Search in Google Scholar
[POWELL, M. B., T. A. MCRAE, H. X. WU, G. W. DUTKOWSKI and D. J. PILBEAM (2004): Breeding strategy for Pinus radiata in Australia. In: Proceedings of an IUFRO joint conference of Division2 Forest genetics and tree breeding in the age of genomics: Progress and future. 1-5 November, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. 8pp. http://www.stba.com.au/documents/powellPRADstratCharlestonv2.pdf. ]Search in Google Scholar
[POWELL, M. B., T. A. MCRAE, D. J. PILBEAM and H. X. WU (2005): Progressing radiata pine breeding in Australia. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Foresters of Australia meeting ‘Burning issues in forestry’ 10-14 April 2005, Mount Gambier, South Australia. 8pp. http://www.stba.com.au/documents/ProgressingRadiataPineinAustraliaApril2005.pdf. ]Search in Google Scholar
[RIBEIRO, V. J., R. P. V. BRONDANI, A. Y. CIAMPI and D. GRATTAPAGLIA (1998): Paternity determination of superior OP progenies of Eucalyptus based on microsatellite markers. Genetic Molecular Biology 21: 212. ]Search in Google Scholar
[ROSSVALL, O., D. LINDGREN and T. J. MULLIN (1998): Sustainability robustness and efficiency of a multi-generation breeding strategy based on within-family clonal selection. Silvae Genetica 47: 307-321.]Search in Google Scholar
[ROSSVALL, O. and T. J. MULLIN (2003): Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 629-642.10.1007/s00122-003-1318-912851766]Search in Google Scholar
[RUOTSALAINEN, S. and D. LINDGREN (2000): Stratified sublining: a new option for structuring breeding populations. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 30: 596-604. 10.1139/x99-245]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[SHAW, D. V. and J. V. HOOD (1985): Maximising gain per effort by using clonal replicates in genetic tests. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 71: 392-399. 10.1007/BF0025117824247443]Search in Google Scholar
[SHELBOURNE, C. J. A., R. D. BURDON, S. D. CARSON, A. FIRTH and T. G. VINCENT (1986): Development plan for radiata pine breeding. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 142pp. ]Search in Google Scholar
[SHELBOURNE, C. J. A., S. KUMAR, R. D. BURDON, L. D. GEA and H. S. DUNGEY (2007): Deterministic Simulation of Gains for Seedling and Cloned Main and Elite Breeding Populations of Pinus radiata and Implications for Strategy. Silvae Genetica 56: 253-300.10.1515/sg-2007-0037]Search in Google Scholar
[STOVOLD, G. T. and P. J. JEFFERSON (2004): 2004 plus tree selections from within the Advanced Generation Dothistroma population trial series (1994) and the High Density Elite trial series (1995). Confidential report to the Radiata Pine Breeding Consortium No. 66. 21pp. ]Search in Google Scholar
[STOVOLD, G. T., R. D. BURDON and L. D. GEA (2004): Needs and options for managing native-provenance gene resources. Unpublished confidential report to the Radiata Pine Breeding Company No. 150. 27pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[THULIN, I. J. (1957): Application of tree breeding to forestry in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 7: 41-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[VERRYN, S. D. and C. L. SNEDDEN (2000): Optimisingthe expected genetic gains of various breeding and selection strategies. In: Proceedings of the international IUFRO conference on Forest Genetics for the Next Millennium, Durban, South Africa, 8-13 October 2000. 260p. (pp 240-243).]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITE, T. L., G. R. HODGE and G. L. POWELL (1993): An advanced-generation tree improvement plan for slash pine in the Southeastern United States. Silvae Genetica 42: 359-371. ]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITE, T. L., A. C. MATHESON, P. P. COTTERILL, R. G. JOHNSON, A. F. ROUT and D. B. BOOMSMA (1999): A Nucleus Breeding Plan for Radiata Pine in Australia. Silvae Genetica 48: 122-133.]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITE, T. L. and M. J. CARSON (2004): Breeding programs of conifers. In: Plantation Forest Biotechnology for the 21st Century. T. L. WHITE and M. J. CARSON (Eds). Research Signpost, Kerala India 446pp. (pp 61-85).]Search in Google Scholar
[WILCOX, P. L., T. E. RICHARDSON and S. D. CARSON (1997): Nature of quantitative trait variation in Pinus radiata: Insights from QTL detection experiments. In: IUFRO working party S2.02.19 Genetics of radiata pine, Proceedings of an international conference 1-4 December 1997. FRI Bulletin No. 203, New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Rotorua New Zealand. 354p. (pp 304-312). ]Search in Google Scholar
[WILCOX, P. L., C. S. ECHT and R. D. BURDON (2007): Geneassisted selection - applications of association genetics for forest tree breeding. In: Association mapping in plants. N. C. ORAGUZIE, E. H. A. RIKKERINK, S. E. GARDINER and H. N. DE SILVA (Eds.). Springer Verlag, New York. 277p. DOI 10.1007/978-0-387=36011-9_10 10.1007/978-0-387=36011-9_10]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[WILLIAMS, C. G. and O. SAVOLAINEN (1996): Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for using selfing as a breeding strategy. Forest Science 42: 102-117. ]Search in Google Scholar
[WILLIAMS, E. R., A. C. MATHESON and C. E. HARWOOD (2002): Experimental design and analysis for tree improvement. CSIRO publishing, Australia. 224p. 10.1071/9780643090132]Search in Google Scholar
[WU, H. X., A. C. MATHESON and D. SPENCER (1998): Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. II. Tim course of inbreeding depression and effect on growth curve. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 28: 123-139. ]Search in Google Scholar
[YONG-BI FU, G., P. Y. CLARKE, G. NAMKOONG and A. D. YANCHUK (1998): Incomplete block designs for genetic testing: statistical efficiencies of estimating family means. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 28: 977-986.10.1139/x98-072]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
