Comparison of Phenotype and Combined Index Selection at Optimal Breeding Population Size Considering Gain and Gene Diversity

ANDERSSON, E. W., K. A. SPANOS, T. J. MULLIN and D. LINDGREN (1998a): Phenotypic selection can be better than selection for breeding value. Scand. J. For. Res. 13: 7-11.10.1080/02827589809382956Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ANDERSSON, E. W., K. A. SPANOS, T. J. MULLIN and D. LINDGREN (1998b): Phenotypic selection compared to restricted combined index selection for many generations. Silva Fennica 32(2): 111-120.10.14214/sf.689Search in Google Scholar

BURTON, G.W. (1974a): Recurrent restricted phenotypic selection increases forage yields of Pensacola bahiagrass. Crop Sci. 14: 831-835.10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400060016xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

BURTON, G.W. (1974b): Improved recurrent restricted phenotypic selection increases Bahiagrass forage yields. Crop Sci. 22: 1058-1061.10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200050040xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

COCKERHAM, C. C. (1967): Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics 56: 89-104.10.1093/genetics/56.1.8912114966035597Search in Google Scholar

COTTERILL, P. P. (1986): Gentic gains from alternative breeding strategies including simple low cost options. Silvae Genet. 35: 212-223.Search in Google Scholar

DANUSEVIČIUS, D. and D. LINDGREN (2005): Optimisation of breeding population size for long-term breeding. Scandinavian Journal Forest Research (20) 1: 18-25.10.1080/02827580410019517Search in Google Scholar

DEMPFLE, L. (1990): Problems in the use of the relationship matrix in animal breeding. In: Advances in statistical methods for genetic improvement of livestock. (ed. D. GIANOLA and K. HAMMOND). Pp. 454-473. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-74487-7_20Search in Google Scholar

FALCONER, D. S. (1989): Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edition. Longman, Scientific and Technical.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D., L. D. GEA and P. A. JEFFERSON (1996): Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genetica 45: 52-59.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. (2003): Low-input tree breeding strategies. In: Eucalyptus plantations-Research, Management and Development, R.-P. WEI and D. XU (eds), World scientific, Singapore, 146-149.10.1142/9789812704504_0013Search in Google Scholar

LSTIBŮREK M, 2005: Population response to positive assortative mating in forest tree breeding, PhD dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh. USA.Search in Google Scholar

MULLIN, T. J. and Y. S. PARK (1995): Stochastic simulation of population management strategies for tree breeding: a new decision support tool for tree personal computers. Silvae Genet. 44: 132-141.Search in Google Scholar

ROSVALL, O. (1999): Enhancing gain from long-term forest tree breeding while conserving genetic diversity. Ph.D Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå.Search in Google Scholar

WEI, R.-P. and D. LINDGREN (1991): Selection effects on diversity and gain. Silva Fennica 25(4): 229-234. Search in Google Scholar

WEI, R.-P. and D. LINDGREN (1993): Phenotypic selection was more efficient than combined index selection when applied on full sibs of lodgepole and Scots pine. Dept. of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, SUAS Report 11: 289-292.Search in Google Scholar