<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> Contradicting results concerning binocular coordination in reading have been reported: Liversedge et al. (2006) reported a dominance of uncrossed fixations, whereas Nuthmann and Kliegl (2009) observed more crossed fixations in reading. Based on both earlier and continuing studies, we conducted a reading experiment involving varying brightness of background and font. Calibration was performed using Gabor patches presented on grey background. During the experimental session, text had to be read either on dark, bright, or grey background. The data corroborates former results that showed a predominance of uncrossed fixations when reading on dark background, as well as those showing a predominance of crossed fixations, when reading on bright background. Besides these systematic shifts, the new results show an increase in unsystematic variability when changing the overall brightness from calibration to test. The origins of the effects need to be clarified in future research.</p></abstract>

Contradicting results concerning binocular coordination in reading have been reported: Liversedge et al. (2006) reported a dominance of uncrossed fixations, whereas Nuthmann and Kliegl (2009) observed more crossed fixations in reading. Based on both earlier and continuing studies, we conducted a reading experiment involving varying brightness of background and font. Calibration was performed using Gabor patches presented on grey background. During the experimental session, text had to be read either on dark, bright, or grey background. The data corroborates former results that showed a predominance of uncrossed fixations when reading on dark background, as well as those showing a predominance of crossed fixations, when reading on bright background. Besides these systematic shifts, the new results show an increase in unsystematic variability when changing the overall brightness from calibration to test. The origins of the effects need to be clarified in future research.

Binocular Coordination in Reading When Changing Background Brightness

Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

{"article-title":"Binocular Coordination in Reading When Changing Background Brightness"}

Contradicting results concerning binocular coordination in reading have been reported: Liversedge et al. (2006) reported a dominance of uncrossed fixations,...

Binocular Coordination in Reading When Changing Background Brightness

Data publikacji: 14 lis 2017

Zakres stron: 359 - 365

Otrzymano: 01 paź 2016

Przyjęty: 28 wrz 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2017-0061

Słowa kluczowe
vergence, binocular coordination, fixation disparity, background brightness, reading

© by Anke Huckauf

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Binocular Coordination in Reading When Changing Background Brightness

Data publikacji: 14 lis 2017

Zakres stron: 359 - 365

Otrzymano: 01 paź 2016

Przyjęty: 28 wrz 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2017-0061

Słowa kluczowevergence, binocular coordination, fixation disparity, background brightness, reading

© by Anke Huckauf

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
vergence, binocular coordination, fixation disparity, background brightness, reading