[Alan, Kenneth. (2011). The Social Lens: An Invitation to Social and Sociological Theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aristotle (2004). Nicomachean Ethics. (Crisp, Roger. Trans. & Edit.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aristotle. (1998) Politics. (Reeves, C. Trans.). Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bozeman, Barry. (2007). Public Values and Public Interests. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caldwell, Lynton. (2005). Public Administration-Th e New Generation: Management in Higher Information-level Societies. Public Administration: An Interdisciplinary Critical Analysis. (Gadot, Eran. Edit.). New York: Taylor and Francis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Casmir, Fred. (1994). Building communication theories: A socio/cultural approach. Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Castells, Manuel. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Castells, Manuel. (2007). Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication. Volume 1, 238-266.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chaffee, S. H. (1975). Political communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corner, John. (2016) Ideology and Media Research. Media, Culture & Society. Volume 38, Issue 2, 265-273.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl, Robert. (1974). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Denhardt, Robert. & Baker, David (2007). Five Great Issues in Organization Theory. Handbook of Public Administration. Boca Raton, Florida: Taylor and Francis Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Durant, Robert. (2004). Reconceptualizing Purpose. Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities. (Durant, Robert. O’Leary, Rosemary. & Fiorino, Daniel. Edits.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Th e Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eikeland, Olav. (2008). Th e Ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian Phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research. Bern, Germany: Peter Lang, AG.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dewey, John. (1929). Experience in Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin, LTD.10.1037/13377-000]Search in Google Scholar
[Fagan, Brian. & Scarre, Christopher. (2008) Ancient Civilizations. Oxon, UK: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Follett, Mary-Parker. (1940). Dynamic Administration: Th e Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frederickson, George. Smith, Kevin. Larimer, Christopher. & Licari, Michael. (2012). The Public Administration Th eory Primer. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuchs, Christian. (2011). Th e Contemporary World Wide Web: Social medium or new space of accumulation? Th e Political Economies of Media: Th e Transformation of the Global Media Industries. (Winseck, Dwayne. & Dal, Jin.Edits.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Garnett, James. (1992). Communicating for Results in Government: A Strategic Approach for Public Managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Garnett, James. (1997). Trends and Gaps in the Treatment of Communication in Organization and Management Theory. Handbook of Administrative Communication. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giddens, Anthony. (1984). Th e Constitution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardt, Hanno. (2001). Social Th eories of the Press: Constituents of Communication Research, 1840s to 1920s. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefi eld Publishers, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holden, M., Jr. (1996). Continuity and disruption: Essays in public administration. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huddleston, Mark. (2000). Onto the Darkling Plain: Globalization and the American Public Service in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Volume 10, Issue 4, 665-684.]Search in Google Scholar
[Innis, Harold. (2007). Empire and Communications. Ontario, Canada: Dundurn Press Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Innis, Harold. (2006). Th e Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kattl, Donald. (2002). Th e Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty First Century America. Baltimore, Maryland: Th e Johns Hopkins University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klijn, Erik. & Koppenjan, Joop. (2012). Governance network theory: past, present and future. Policy and Politics. Volume 40, Number 4, 187-206.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Mordecai. (2011). Government Public Relations: What is it Good For? Th e Practice of Government Public Relations. (Lee, Mordecai. Neeley, Grant. Stewart, Kendra. Edit.). Boca Rotan, Florida: Taylor & Francis Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Mordecai. (2009). Th e Return of Public Relations to the Public Administration Curriculum? Journal of Public Aff airs Education. Volume 15, Number 4, 515-533.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu B.F. & Horsley J.S. (2007). Th e Government Communication Decision Wheel: Toward a Public Relations Model for the Public Sector. Journal of Public Relations Research. Volume 19, Issue 4, 377-378.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorch, Robert. (1978). Public Administration. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Luhmann, Niklas. (1995). Social Systems. (Bednarz, John. & Baecker, Dirk. Trans.). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Luhmann, Niklas. (2002). Th eories of distinction: Redescribing the Condition of Modernity. (Rasch, William. Edit.) Stanford California: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503619340]Search in Google Scholar
[Mann, Michael. (2005). Th e Sources of Power: A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsh, David. & Smith, Martin. (2000). Understanding Policy Networks: towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies. Volume 48, Issue 1, 4-21.10.1111/1467-9248.00247]Search in Google Scholar
[McLaughlin, Paul. (2001). Toward an Ecology of Social Action: Merging the Ecological and Constructivist Traditions. Human Ecology Review. Vol. 8, No. 2, 12-28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, Leon. (2016). Intercultural Communications and Global Social Existence: A cross cultural analysis of communication theory. Review of Social Sciences. Volume 1, Number 1, 26-37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, Leon. (2015). A Marketing Strategy for Democratizing Value Creation. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT. Vol. 10, Issue 1, Article Number 4, 17-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, Leon. (2014a). Power, Knowledge Generation, Middle Eastern Transcendentalism and Global Rational Discourse. Th e Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies. Volume XXXVIII, Number 1, 1-21.10.1353/jsa.2014.0018]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, Leon. (2014b). Th e Role of Religion in Shaping Global Social Existence. International Journal of Religion and Society. Volume 4, Number 4, 439-455.]Search in Google Scholar
[Molina, Anthony. & Spicer, Michael. (2004). Aristotelian Rhetoric, Pluralism, and Public Administration. Administration and Society. Volume 36, Number 3, 282-305.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, Mark. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nerone, John. (2006). Th e Future of Communication History. Critical Studies in Media Communication. Volume 23, Number 3, 254-62.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Toole, Laurence. (1997a). Th e Implications for Democracy in a Networked Bureaucratic World. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Volume 7, Issue 3, 443-459.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024358]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Toole, Laurence. (1997b). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review. Volume 57, Number 1, 45-52.10.2307/976691]Search in Google Scholar
[Oppenheim, Leo. (1977). Ancient Mesopotamia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177670.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Osborne, Roger. (2006). Civilization: A New History of the Western World. New York: Pegasus Books, LLC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parsons, Talcott. (1991).Th e Social System. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Powell, F. (2007). Th e Politics of Civil Society. Bristol, UK: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raadschelders, Jos. & Vifos-Gadot, Eran. (2015) Dimensions of Public Adminstratinon and Governance. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rice, Mitchell. (2007). A post-modern cultural competency framework for public administration and public service delivery. International Journal of Public Sector Management. Volume 20, Number 7, 622-637.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rice, Mitchell. (2015). Diversity and Public Administration: Th eory, Issues, and Perspectives. (Rice, Mitchell. Edit.). Oxon, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9781315705149]Search in Google Scholar
[Riggs, Fred. (1980). Th e Ecology and Context of Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. Public Administration Review, Volume 40, Number 2, 107-115.10.2307/975620]Search in Google Scholar
[Risjord, Mark. (2014). Philosophy of Social Science. New York: Routledge Publishing.10.4324/9780203802540]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenbloom, David. (2002). Public Administration and Civil Liberties. Public Administration Review. Volume 62, 58-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rossides, Daniel. (1998). Social Th eory: Its Origins, History, and Contemporary Relevance. Dixon Hills, New York: General Hall, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roy, Jeffrey. (2013) Public Administration and Information Technology. New York: Springer Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, Herbert. (1957). Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: McMillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarkar, Siuli. (2010). Public Administration in India. New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Standage, Tom. (2013). Writing on the Wall: Social Media - Th e First 2,000 Years. New York: Bloomsbury USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stillman, Richard. (2012). Public Administration: Concept and Cases. Boston, Massachusetts: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoker, Gerry. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? American Review of Public Administration. Volume 36, Number 1, 41-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, Karen. (2009). Law and Punishment in the Formation of Empire. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. (Scheidel, Walter. Edit.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldo, Dwight. (1952). Development of Theory of Democratic Administration. American Political Science Review. Volume 46, issue 1, 81-103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldo, Dwight. (1992). Foreword. In J.L. Garnett, Communicating for results in government: A strategic approach for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldo, Dwight. (1948). Th e Administrative State. New York: Th e Ronald Press Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldo, Dwight. (1955). Th e Study of Public Administration. Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walsh, Kieron. (1994). Marketing and Public Sector Management. European Journal of Marketing. Volume 28, Number 3, 63-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, Max. (1978). Economy and Society. (Roth, Guenther. & Wittich, Claus. Edits.). Berkeley, California: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, Max. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. (Gerth, H. & Mills, Wright. Edits. & Trans.). New York: Galaxy Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellen, Richard. (1996). Dilemmas in Liberal Democratic Th ought Since Max Weber. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
