[1. VianaM., et al., Impact of maritime transport emissions on coastal air quality in Europe. Atmospheric Environment 90,pp. 96-105, 2014.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.046]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Wang C., Corbett J.J., Firestone J., Improving spatial representation of global ship emissions inventories. Environmental Science and Technology 42, pp. 193-199,2008.10.1021/es070079918350896]Search in Google Scholar
[3. EEA.: Transport indicators tracking progress towards environmental targets in Europe. The Contribution of transport to air quality.EEA, Copenhagen, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Eyringer V., Köhler H. W., Lauer A., Lemper B., Emissions from international shipping: 2. Impact of future technologies on scenarios until 2050. J. Geophys 110, D17306,2005.10.1029/2004JD005620]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Corbett J.J., Winebrake J.J., Green E.H., KasibhatlaP., Eyring V., LauerA., Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. Environmental Science and Technology 41, pp. 8512-85182007.10.1021/es071686z18200887]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Endresen Ø., Sørgård E., Sundet J.K., Dalsøren S.B., Isaksen I.S., Berglen T.F., Gravir G., Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, pp. 108, 2003.10.1029/2002JD002898]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Ülpre H., Eames I., Environmental policy constraints for acidic exhaust gas scrubber discharges from ships. Marine Pollution Bulletin 88,pp. 292-301, 2014.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.08.02725284442]Search in Google Scholar
[8. IMO.: Second IMO GHG study. London, UK, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. RavenJ., Caldeira K., Elderfield H., Hoegh-Guldberg O., Liss P., Riebesell U., Shepherd J., Turley C., Watson A.: Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. The Royal Society: The Science Policy Section, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Blatcher D., Eames I., Compliance of royal navy ships with nitrogen oxide emissions legislation. Mar. Pollut. Bull 74, pp. 10-18, 2013.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.01023906471]Search in Google Scholar
[11. CalleyaJ., PawlingR., GreigA., Ship impact model for technical assessment and selection of Carbon Dioxide Reducing Technologies (CRTs). Ocean Engineering 97, pp. 82-89,2015.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.014]Search in Google Scholar
[12. AzimovU., TomitaE., KawaharaN., and DolS. S., Combustion characteristics of syngas and natural gas in micro-pilot ignited dual-fuel engine. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 6(12), pp. 1595-1602, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Weaver C.: Natural gas vehicles - a review of the state of the art. SAE technical paper 892133, doi:10.4271/892133, 1989.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Nichols R.J., The challenges of change in the auto industry: Why alternative fuels? J.Eng.Gas Turb Power 116,pp. 727-32, 1994.10.1115/1.2906879]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Lieuwen T., Yang V., Yetter R.: Synthesis gas combustion: Fundamentals and applications. Taylor & Francis Group, 2010.10.1201/9781420085358]Search in Google Scholar
[16. MuradovN. Z., and VezirogluT. N., Green path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: An overview of carbon neutral technologies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33,pp. 6804-6839, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. RiboldiL.,Bolland O., Pressure swing adsorption for coproduction of power and ultrapure H2 in an IGCC plant with CO2 capture. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41(25), pp. 10646-10660, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Funke H. H.-W., et al., Experimental and numerical study of the micro mix combustion principle applied for hydrogen and hydrogen- rich syngas as fuel with increased energy density for industrial gas turbine. Applications Energy Procedia 61, pp. 1736 - 1739, 2014. ]Search in Google Scholar
[19. BouvetN., et al., Characterization of syngas laminar flames using the Bunsen burner configuration. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36, pp. 992-1005, 2011.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.147]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Domachowski Z., Dzida M., An analysis of characteristics of ship gas turbine propulsion system (in the light of the requirements for ship operation in the Baltic Sea). Pol. Marit, [special issue], pp. 73-78, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Khalil A. E. E., Gupta A. K., Swirling flow-field for colorless distributed combustion. Applied Energy 113, pp. 208-218,2014.10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.029]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Lilley D.G., Modeling of combustor swirl flows. Acta Astronautica 1(9-10), pp. 1129-1147,1974.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Syred N., Beér J.M., Combustion in swirling flows: A review. Combustion and Flame 23(2), pp.143-201, 1974.10.1016/0010-2180(74)90057-1]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Osvaldo V-Z. M., Syred N., Agustín V-M., Daniel D. R-U., Flashback avoidance in swirling flow burners. Ingeniería, Investigacióny Tecnología 15(4), pp. 603-614,2014.10.1016/S1405-7743(14)70658-4]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Zaid A., FaragA.: Effect of secondary air configuration in gas turbine combustor firing natural gas. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition IMECE2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, November 14-20, 2014.10.1115/IMECE2014-36255]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Beer J.M., and Chigier, N.A.: Combustion Aerodynamics, Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 1972.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. GAMBIT team: GAMBIT program user guide, September 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Knopp T., Eisfeld B., Calvo J. B., A new extension for k -ῼ turbulence models to account for wall roughness. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 30, pp. 54-65, 2009.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.09.009]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Cheng P., Two-dimensional radiating gas flow by a moment method. AIAA Journal 2, pp. 1662-1664, 1964.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Siegel R., Howell J. R.: Thermal radiation heat transfer. Hemisphere, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Ahmed A. S., Velocity measurements and turbulence statistics of a confined isothermal swirling flow. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 17, pp. 256 -264, 1998.10.1016/S0894-1777(97)10039-5]Search in Google Scholar
[32. AndreiniA., et al., CFD analysis of NOx emissions of a natural gas lean premixed burner for heavy duty gas turbine. Energy Procedia 81, pp. 967 - 976, 2015.10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.155]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Ghenai C., Combustion of syngas fuel in gas turbine can combustor. Hindawi publishing corporation. advances in Mechanical Engineering, doi:10.1155/2010/342357, pp. 1-13, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Whitty K. J., Zhang H. R., and Eddings E. G., Emissions from syngas combustion. Combust. Sci. and Tech. 180, pp. 1117-1136, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Chacartegui R., et al., Analysis of main gaseous emissions of heavy duty gas turbines burning several syngas fuels. Fuel Processing Technology 92, pp. 213-220, 2011.10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.014]Search in Google Scholar
[36. WelayaY.M., Mosleh M., Ammar N.R., Thermodynamic Analysis of Combined Solid Fuel Cell with a Steam Turbine Power Plant for Marine Applications. Brodgradnja/ Shipbuilding 65(1), pp. 97-115, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Welaya Y.M., Mosleh M., Ammar N.R., Thermodynamic analysis of a combined gas turbine power plant with a solid oxide fuel cell for marine applications. Int. J. Naval Archit. Ocean Eng. 5 , pp. 404-413, 2013.10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0151]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Mustafi N.N., Miraglia Y.C., Raine R.R., Bansal P.K., and Elder S.T., Sparkignition engine performance with ‘Powergas’ fuel (mixture of CO=H2): A comparison with gasoline and natural gas. Fuel 85(12-13), pp. 1605-1612, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Ratafia-Brown, J.A., Manfredo L.M., Hoffman J.W., Ramezan M., and Steigel G.J.: An environmental assessment of IGCC power systems. Presented at the Nineteenth Annual Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 23-27 September, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar