[Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel. “Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2011): 288-297. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhatia, Vijay K. Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. New York: Continuum, 2004. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, Peneloppe and Stephen Levinson. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Print.10.1017/CBO9780511813085]Search in Google Scholar
[Clemen, Gudrun. “The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions.” Eds. Raija Markkanen and Hartmut Schroder. Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1997. 235-248. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga. “Authorial presence in academic discourse: Functions of author-reference pronouns.” Linguistica Pragensia 23/1 (2013a), 9-30. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “The Changing face of Czech academic discourse.” Ed. Karen Bennett. The Semiperiphery of Academic Writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013b. 39-61. Print. 10.1057/9781137351197_3]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “Cross-cultural variation in citation practices: A comparative analysis of citations in Czech English-medium and international English-medium linguistics journals.” Eds. Ramon Plo Alastrue and Carmen Perez-Llantada. English as a Scientifi c and Research Language. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, 2015. 185-205. Print.10.1515/9781614516378-011]Search in Google Scholar
[Fløttum, Kjersti. “Personal English, indefinite French and plural Norwegian scientific authors? Pronominal author manifestation in research articles.” Norsk Lingvistisk TidsskriTh21/1 (2003), 21-55. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gillaerts, Paul and Freek Van de Velde. “Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts.” Journal of English for Academic purposes 9 (2010), 128-139. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gotti, Maurizio. “Cross-cultural aspects of academic discourse.” Brno Studies in English 38 (2), (2012), 59-78. Print.10.5817/BSE2012-2-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, Bethany and Douglas Biber. Current conceptions of stance. Eds. Hyland, Ken and Carmen Sancho Guinda. Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 15-33. Print.10.1057/9781137030825_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Hewings, Ann, Theresa Lillis and Dimitra Vladimirou. “Who’s citing whose writings? A corpus based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 (2010), 102-115. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holmes, Janet. “Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech.” Language & Communication 10 (1990), 185-205. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. Men, women and politeness. New York: Longman, 1995. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “Modifying illocutionary force.” Journal of Pragmatics 8 (1984), 345-365. Print.10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Hu, Guangwei and Feng Cao. “Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2011), 2795-2809. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. “Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge.” Text 18 (1998a), 349-382. Print. 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349]Search in Google Scholar
[---. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman, 2000. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1998b. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction. London: Continuum, 2005. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum.” System 24/4 (1996), 477-490. Print. 10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00043-7]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of metadiscourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 30 (1998c), 437-455. Print. 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Presenting self and others in research writing.” IJES 2/8 (2008), 1-23. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken and John Milton. “Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (1997), 183-205. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse. “Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal.” Applied Linguistics 25 (2004), 156-177. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ivanič, Roz. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998. Print.10.1075/swll.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin-Martin, Pedro. “The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study.” IJES 8/2 (2008), 133-152. Print ]Search in Google Scholar
[Mauranen, Anna. “Contrastive ESP Rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economics texts.” English for Specific Purposes 12 (1993), 3-22. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. Hedging in language reviser’s hands. Eds. Raija Markkanen and Hartmut Schroder. Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1997. 115-133. Print.10.1515/9783110807332.115]Search in Google Scholar
[Mauranen, Anna, Carmen Perez-Llantada and John Swales. “Academic Englishes: A standardized knowledge?” Ed. Kirkpatrick, Andy. The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. London: Routledge, 2010. 634-652. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Molino, Alessandra. “Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian linguistics research articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9/2 (2010), 86-101. Print.10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Mur-Dueňas, Pilar. “I/we focus on…: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6 (2007), 143-162. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “Citation in business management research articles.” Eds. Suomela-Salmi Eija and Fred Dervin. Cross-cultural linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse. Amsterdam & New York: John Benjamins, 2009. 40-60. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Povolná, Renata. “Cross-cultural variation in the degree of dialogicality in research articles: On some text-organizing devices.” Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Renata Jančařikova, Gabriela Miššikova and Renata Povolna. Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse. Brno: Masaryk University, 2012. 29-58. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “On cross-cultural variation in the use of conjuncts in research articles by Czech and native speakers of English of English: Can conjuncts contribute to the interactive and dialogic character of academic texts?” Eds. Ramon Plo Alastrue and Carmen Perez-Llantada. English as a Scientific and Research Language. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, 2015. 115-140. Print.10.1515/9781614516378-008]Search in Google Scholar
[Prince, Ellen R., Joel Frader and Charles Bosk. “On hedging in physicianphysician discourse.” Ed. Robert J. Di Pietro Linguistics and the professions. Proceedings of the second annual Delaware symposium on language studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1982. 83-97. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salager-Meyer, Francoise. “Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 3 (1994), 49-170. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Samaie, Mahmoud, Fereshteh Khosravian and Mahnaz Boghayeri. “The frequency and types of hedges in research article Introductions by Persian and English native authors.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (2014), 1678-1685. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Takimoto, Masahiro. “Assertions and lexical invisibility in EFL learners’ academic essays.” Journal of Pragmatics 89 (2015), 85-99. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vassileva, Irena. Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specic Purposes 20 (2001), 83-102. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “Who am I/who are we in academic writing?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8/2 (1998), 163-192. Print. 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x]Search in Google Scholar
[---. Who is the author? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian academic discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard Verlag, 2000. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vazquez, Ignacio and Diana Giner. “Beyond Mood and Modality: Epistemic Modality Markers as Hedges in Research Articles. A Cross-Disciplinary Study.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 21 (2008), 171-190. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “Writing with Conviction: The Use of Boosters in Modelling Persuasion in Academic Discourses. A Cross-Disciplinary Study.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 22 (2008), 219-237. Print.10.14198/raei.2009.22.14]Search in Google Scholar
[Yakhontova, Tatyana. “Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (2006), 153-167. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
[---. “‘Selling’ or ‘telling’? The issue of cultural variation in research genres.” Ed. John Flowerdew. Academic discourse. Harlow: Longman, 2002. 216-232. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, Yingli. “Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 50 (2013), 23-36. Print. ]Search in Google Scholar
