Organizational Ambidexterity, Exploration, Exploitation and Firms Innovation Performance

Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.6110.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61Search in Google Scholar

Atuahene-Gima, K., & Murray, J. Y. (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing, 15(02), 1-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.2.110.1509/jimk.15.2.1Search in Google Scholar

Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267-294, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8Search in Google Scholar

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676-707, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/309491310.2307/3094913Search in Google Scholar

Bierly, P. E., & Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 493-516, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.x 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.xSearch in Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287-298, http://10.5465/amp.2012.016710.5465/amp.2012.0167Search in Google Scholar

Blindenbach‐Driessen, F., & Ende, J. (2014). The Locus of Innovation: The Effect of a Separate Innovation Unit on Exploration, Exploitation, and Ambidexterity in Manufacturing and Service Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 1089-1105, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.1214610.1111/jpim.12146Search in Google Scholar

Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.042610.1287/orsc.1090.0426Search in Google Scholar

Černe, M., Jaklič, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2013). Decoupling management and technological innovations: Resolving the individualism-collectivism controversy. Journal of International Management, 19(2), 103-117, http://10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.004 10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.004Search in Google Scholar

de Leeuw, T., Lokshin, B., & Duysters, G. (2013). Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity, Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1839-1849, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.12.00510.1016/j.jbusres.2013.12.005Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organization al ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2015957310.2307/20159573Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026.10.5465/amj.2006.22083026Search in Google Scholar

He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.007810.1287/orsc.1040.0078Search in Google Scholar

Hernández-Espallardo, M., Sánchez-Pérez, M., & Segovia- López, C. (2011). Exploitation-and exploration- based innovations: the role of knowledge in inter- firm relationships with distributors. Technovation, 31(5), 203-215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.00710.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, J. J., Simsek, Z., & Cao, Q. (2012). Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.197710.1002/smj.1977Search in Google Scholar

Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.001510.5465/amp.2012.0015Search in Google Scholar

Kammerlander, N., Burger, D., Fust, A., & Fueglistaller, U. (2014). Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs’ regulatory focus. Journal of Business Venturing. In Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.00410.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Koza, M. P., & Lewin, A. Y. (1998). The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3), 255-264, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.25510.1287/orsc.9.3.255Search in Google Scholar

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.50710.1002/smj.507Search in Google Scholar

Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797-818, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.2208308510.5465/amj.2006.22083085Search in Google Scholar

Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1941652100369128710.1080/19416521003691287Search in Google Scholar

Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in smallto medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630629071210.1177/0149206306290712Search in Google Scholar

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87, http://www.jstor.org/stable/263494010.1287/orsc.2.1.71Search in Google Scholar

Nerkar, A. (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49(2), 211-229, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.2.211.1274710.1287/mnsc.49.2.211.12747Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.002510.5465/amp.2013.0025Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74-83.Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.00210.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Oerlemans, L. A., Knoben, J., & Pretorius, M. W. (2013). Alliance portfolio diversity, radical and incremental innovation: The moderating role of technology management. Technovation, 33(6), 234-246, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.02.00410.1016/j.technovation.2013.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630831605810.1177/0149206308316058Search in Google Scholar

Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.042810.1287/orsc.1090.0428Search in Google Scholar

Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 687-699, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.18010.1002/smj.180Search in Google Scholar

Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.040410.1287/orsc.1080.0404Search in Google Scholar

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597-624, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.xSearch in Google Scholar

Stadler, C., Rajwani, T., & Karaba, F. (2014). Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma: Networks as a new level of analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(2), 172-193, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.1201510.1111/ijmr.12015Search in Google Scholar

Stettner, U., & Lavie, D. (2013). Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1903-1929, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.219510.1002/smj.2195Search in Google Scholar

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolution ary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-30.10.2307/41165852Search in Google Scholar

Venkatraman, N., Lee, C.H., & Iyer, B. (2007). Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: tA longitudinal test in the software sector. (Working paper). Boston University. Search in Google Scholar