[Altshuler R. and Mintz J.M., 1995. U.S. Interest-Allocation Rules: Effects and Policy. International Tax and Public Finance 2, 7-35.10.1007/BF00873105]Search in Google Scholar
[Bach S. and Buslei H., 2009. Empirische Analysen zur Zinsschranke auf Grundlage von Handelsbilanzdaten. DIW Research Notes 30, Berlin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bach S., 2009. Stellungnahme des DIW Berlin zum Gesetzentwurf Bürgerentlastungsgesetz Krankenversicherung BT-Drucksache 16/12254 und BR-Drucksache 168/09. DIW Berlin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blaufus K. and Lorenz D., 2009. Wem droht die Zinsschranke? Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Identifikation der Einflussfaktoren. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 79, 503-526.10.1007/s11573-009-0231-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Blouin J., Huizinga H., Laeven L. and Nicodeme G., 2014. Thin Capitalization Rules and Multinational Firm Capital Structure. CentER Discussion Paper No. 2014-007.10.2139/ssrn.2398815]Search in Google Scholar
[Boadway R. and Bruce N., 1984. A General Proposition on the Design of a Neutral Business Tax. Journal of Public Economics 11, 93-105.10.1016/0047-2727(79)90047-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Broer M., 2009. Ziele, Wirkungsweise und Steueraufkommen der neuen Zinsschranke. Schmollers Jahrbuch 129, 391-413.10.3790/schm.129.3.391]Search in Google Scholar
[Büttner T., Overesch M., Schreiber U. and Wamser G., 2009. Taxation and Capital Structure Choice - Evidence from a Panel of German Multinationals. Economics Letters 105, 309-311.10.1016/j.econlet.2009.09.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Büttner T., Overesch M., Schreiber U. and Wamser G., 2012. The Impact of Thin-capitalization Rules on the Capital Structure of Multinational Firms. Journal of Public Economics 96, 930-938.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.06.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Büttner T., Overesch M. and Wamser G., 2014. Anti Profit-Shifting Rules and Foreign Direct Investment, CESifo Working Paper No. 4710, Munich.10.2139/ssrn.2425531]Search in Google Scholar
[Buslei H. and Simmler M., 2012. The Impact of Introducing an Interest Barrier - Evidence from the German Corporation Tax Reform 2008. DIW Discussion Papers 1215, Berlin.10.2139/ssrn.2111316]Search in Google Scholar
[Deloitte 2014. Guide to Controlled Foreign Company Regimes. Accessed online at http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-guide-to-cfc-regimes-210214.pdfonNovember13th2014. ]Search in Google Scholar
[De Mooij R.A., 2011. Tax Biases to Debt Finance: Assessing the Problem, Finding Solutions. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/11/11, Washington DC.10.5089/9781463935139.006]Search in Google Scholar
[De Mooij R.A. and Devereux M., 2011. An Applied Analysis of ACE and CBIT Reforms in the EU. International Tax and Public Finance 18, 93-120.10.1007/s10797-010-9138-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Det Kongelige Finansdepartement, 2013a. Prop. 1 LS (2013-2014): Skatter, Avgifter og Toll 2014. Proposisjon til Stortinget (forslag til lovvedtak og stortingsvedtak) for budsjettåret 2014, Oslo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Det Kongelige Finansdepartement, 2013b. Prop. 1 LS Tilleg 1 (2013-2014): Skatter, Avgifter og Toll 2014. Oslo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Desai M.A., Foley C.F. and Hines J.R., 2004. A Multinational Perspective on Capital Structure Choice and Internal CapitalMarkets. Journal of Finance 59, 2451-2487.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00706.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dourado A. and de la Feria R., 2008. Thin Capitalization Rules in the Context of the CCCTB. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper 08/04.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dreßler D., and Scheuering U., 2012. Empirical Evaluation of Interest Barrier Effects. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 12-046.10.2139/ssrn.2112117]Search in Google Scholar
[Egger P. and Wamser G., 2011. The Impact of Controlled Foreign Company Legislation on Real Investments Abroad: A two-dimensional Regression Discontinuity Design. CEPR Working Paper No. 8460, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst& Young, 2014. Worldwide Corporate Tax Guide 2014. EYGMLimited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Federal Public Service FINANCE, 2012. Notional Interest Deduction: An Innovative Belgian Tax Incentive. Ministry of Finance, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Förster G. and Schmidtmann D., 2004. CFC Legislation in Germany. Intertax 32, 476-486.10.54648/TAXI2004074]Search in Google Scholar
[Folkvord B. and Jacobsen M.R., 2014. Corporate Income Tax and the International Challenge. Nordic Tax Journal 2014:2, 55-87.10.1515/ntaxj-2014-0019]Search in Google Scholar
[Froot K.A. and Hines jr. J.R., 1995. Interest Allocation Rules, Financing Patterns, and the Operations of U.S. Multinationals. In: Feldstein M., Hines jr. J.R. and Hubbard R.G. (eds), The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations. University of Chicago Press, 277-312.10.3386/w4924]Search in Google Scholar
[Gouthière B., 2005. A Comparative Study of the Thin Capitalization Rules in the Member States of the European Union and Certain Other Countries. European Taxation 45, 367-451.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haufler A. and Runkel M., 2012. Firms’ Financial Choices and Thin- Capitalization Rules under Corporate Tax Competition. European Economic Review 56, 1087-1103.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Herzig N., Lochmann U. and Liekenbrock B., 2008. Die Zinsschranke im Lichte einer Unternehmensbefragung Unternehmensbefragung. Der Betrieb 61, 593-602.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hong Q. and Smart M., 2010. In Praise of Tax Havens: International Tax Planning and Foreign Direct Investment. European Economic Review 54, 82-95.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.06.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Huizinga H., Laeven L. and Nicodème G., 2008. Capital Structure and International Debt-shifting. Journal of Financial Economics 88, 80-118.10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Institute for Fiscal Studies, 1991. Equity for Companies. A Corporation Tax for the 1990s. London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knipe P.J., Stryker J.P. and Thorne B., 2009. Earnings Stripping Under Section 163(j): Status Quo Vadis? International Business: Research, Teaching and Practice 3, 90-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lodin S.O., 2014. An Overview of the Proposal of the Swedish Government Committee on Corporate Taxation. Nordic Tax Journal 2014:2, 43-54.10.1515/ntaxj-2014-0018]Search in Google Scholar
[Mintz J. and Smart M., 2004. Income Shifting, Investment, and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence from Provincial Taxation in Canada. Journal of Public Economics 88, 1149-1168.10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00060-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Mintz J.M. and Weichenrieder A.J., 2010. The Indirect Side of Direct Investment - Multinational Company Finance and Taxation. MIT Press, Cambridge.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014496.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Mirrlees J.A., Adam S., Besley T.J., Blundell R., Bond S., Chote R., Gammie M., Johnson P., Myles G.D. and Poterba J.M., 2011. Tax by Design: The Mirrlees Review. Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Møen, J., Schindler D., Schjelderup G. and Tropina J., 2011. International Debt Shifting: Do Multinationals Shift Internal or External Debt? Department of Economics Working Paper 2011-40, University of Konstanz.10.2139/ssrn.1891843]Search in Google Scholar
[NOU2014:13, 2014. Kapitalbeskatning i en internasjonal økonomi. Norges offentlige utredninger, Oslo.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD, 2013. Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264202719-en 10.1787/9789264202719-en]Search in Google Scholar
[Overesch M. and Wamser G., 2010. Corporate Tax Planning and Thin Capitalization Rules: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment. Applied Economics 42, 562-573.10.1080/00036840701704477]Search in Google Scholar
[Overesch M. and Wamser G., 2014. Bilateral Internal Debt Financing and Tax Planning ofMultinational Firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 42, 191-209.10.1007/s11156-012-0339-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Panteghini P., Parisi M.L. and Pighetti F., 2012. Italy’s ACE Tax and Its Effect on a Firm’s Leverage. CESifo Working Paper Nr. 3869, Munich.10.2139/ssrn.2101063]Search in Google Scholar
[Penttilä S. and Nieminen M., 2013. Finland - Interest Deduction Limitation Rules Introduced. European Taxation, May 2013, 237-242.]Search in Google Scholar
[Princen S., 2012. Taxes Do Affect Corporate Financing Decisions: The Case of Belgian ACE. CESifo Working Paper No. 3713, Munich.10.2139/ssrn.1992330]Search in Google Scholar
[Regeringen, 2014. Summaries of the Proposal from the Swedish Committee on Corporate Taxation. http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/24/22/09/23b369ae.pdf ]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruf M. and Weichenrieder A.J., 2012. The Taxation of Passive Foreign Investments: Lessons from German Experience. Canadian Journal of Economics 45, 1504-1528.10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01737.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schindler D. and Schjelderup G., 2012. Debt Shifting and Ownership Structure. European Economic Review 56, 635-647.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Schindler D. and Schjelderup G., 2013. Transfer Pricing and Debt Shifting in Multinationals. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4381, Munich.10.2139/ssrn.2319873]Search in Google Scholar
[SOU2014:40, 2014. Neutral Bolagsskatt - För Ökad Effektivitet och Stabilitet. Slutbetänkande av Företagsskattekommittén. Statens offentliga utredingar, Stockholm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Statistisches Bundesamt, 2011. Fachserie 14 Reihe 4 - Finanzen und Steuern - Steuerhaushalt. Wiesbaden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sylt C. and Reid C., 2011. Formula Money. Formula One’s Financial Performance Guide. CNC - Communication and Network Consulting, Wyndeham Grange, Southwick, West Sussex.]Search in Google Scholar
[US Department of Treasury, 1992. Integration of the Individual and Corporate Tax Systems: Taxing Business Income Once. US Government Printing Oflce, Washington.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wamser G., 2014. The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on External Debt Usage - A Propensity Score Matching Approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 76, 764-781.10.1111/obes.12040]Search in Google Scholar
[Weichenrieder A.J. and Windischbauer H., 2008. Thin-Capitalization Rules and Company Responses: Experience from German Legislation. CESifo Working Paper Nr. 2456, Munich.10.2139/ssrn.1299533]Search in Google Scholar