[Alesina, Alberto. 1988. “Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Rational Voters.” American Economic Review 78, 796–805.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, Alberto and S. E. Spear. 1987. “An Overlapping Generations Model of Electoral Competition.” NBER Working Paper Series #2354. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w2354]Search in Google Scholar
[Aragones, Enriqueta and Thomas Palfrey. 2002. “Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate.” Journal of Economic Theory 103, 131–161.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bardham, Pranab, 2002. “Decentralization of Governance and Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(4), 185–205.10.1257/089533002320951037]Search in Google Scholar
[Besley, Timothy and Robin Burgess, 2002. “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4), 1415–1451.10.1162/003355302320935061]Search in Google Scholar
[Besley, Timothy. 2003. “Paying Politicians: Theory and Evidence.” Joseph Schumpeter Lecture at the 18th Congress of the European Economic Association in Stockholm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Besley, Timothy. 2004. “Paying Politicians: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of the European Economic Association 2, 193–215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Besley, Timothy. 2005. “Political Selection.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 43–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Besley, Timothy. 2006. “Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government.” The Lindahl Lectures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Besley, Timothy. 2007. “The New Political Economy.” The Economic Journal 117(524), 570–587.]Search in Google Scholar
[Besley, Timothy and Maitreesh Ghatak. 2005. “Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents.” American Economic Review 95, 616–636.]Search in Google Scholar
[Black, G. S. 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” American Political Science Review 66, 144–159.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brunstein, J. C. and G. W. Maier. 2005. “Implicit and Self-Attributed Motives to Achieve: Two Separate but Interacting Needs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89, 205–222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Callander, S. 2008. “Political Motivations.” The Review of Economic Studies 75, 671–697.]Search in Google Scholar
[Calvert, Randall L. 1985. “Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence.” American Journal of Political Science 29, 69–95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chambers, C. 2007. “Citizen-Candidates, Lobbies, and Strategic Campaigning.” Economic Theory 33, 285–309.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Cathy J. and Michael C. Dawson. 1993. “Neighborhood Poverty and African American Politics.” American Political Science Review 87, 286–302.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, Timothy E. and Paul Gronke. 2005. “The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions.” Journal of Politics 67(3), 784–803.]Search in Google Scholar
[Diermeier, Daniel, Michael Keane and Antonio Merlo. 2005. “A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers.” American Economic Review 95, 347–373.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferraz, Claudio and Frederico Finan. 2007. “Electoral Accountability and Corruption in Local Governments: Evidence from Audit Reports.” #2843 IZA Working Papers.10.2139/ssrn.998235]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferraz, Claudio and Frederico Finan. 2009. Motivating Politicians: The Impacts of Monetary Incentives on Quality and Performance. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Paper #14906.10.3386/w14906]Search in Google Scholar
[Florina, Morris. 1973. “Electoral Margins, Constituency Influence, and Policy Moderation: A Critical Assessment.” American Political Quarterly 1, 479–498.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox, Richard L. and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2011. “Gaining and Losing Interest in Running for Public Office: The Concept of Dynamic Political Ambition.” The Journal of Politics 73, 443–462.]Search in Google Scholar
[Golley, Jane, 2002. “Regional Patterns of Industrial Development During Economic Transition.” Economics of Transition, 10(3): 761–801.10.1111/1468-0351.t01-1-00133]Search in Google Scholar
[Grindle, Merilee S. 2007. “Good enough governance.” Development Policy Review 25(5). 533–574.10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hetherington, Mark, 2005. “Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism.” Journal of Politics 54, 553–564.10.1515/9780691188690]Search in Google Scholar
[Isaac, R. G., W. J. Zerbe and D.C. Pitt. 2001. “Leadership and Motivation: The Effective Application of Expectancy Theory.” Journal of Managerial Issues 13(2), 212–226.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krasa, S. and M. K. Polborn. 2012. “Political Competition between Differentiated Candidates.” Games and Economic Behavior 76, 249–271.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawler, E. E., L. W. Porter and A. Tennenbaum. 1968. “Managers’ Attitudes toward Interaction Episodes.” Journal of Applied Psychology 52, 432–439.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matozzi, Andrea and Antonio Merlo. 2007. “Political Careers or Career Politicians?” PIER Working Paper 007–009.10.3386/w12921]Search in Google Scholar
[Messner, Matthias and Mattias Polborn. 2004. “Paying Politicians.” Journal of Public Economics 88, 2423–2445.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman and Johnny Saldana. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Riordan, Joanna. 2013. Public Service Motivation. State of the Public Service Series, Ireland: Institute of Public Administration.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, pp. 169–186. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perry, James L., Annie Hondeghem, 2008. “Building Theory and Empirical Evidence about Public Service Motiation.” International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 3–12.10.1080/10967490801887673]Search in Google Scholar
[Persson, Torsten and Guido Tabellini. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piven, Frances Fox and Richard Cloward. 1997. The Breaking of the American Social Compact. New York: New York Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rabideau, S. T. 2005. Effects of Achievement Motivation on Behavior. http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/rabideau.html [accessed January 2015].]Search in Google Scholar
[Rehm P., 2009. “Risks and Redistribution: An Individual-Level Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42, 855–881.10.1177/0010414008330595]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vroom, V. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wittman, D. A. 1977. “Candidates with Policy Preferences: A Dynamic Model.” Journal of Economic Theory 14, 180–189.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wittman, Donald 1983. “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories.” American Political Science Review 77, 142–157.10.2307/1956016]Search in Google Scholar