1. bookTom 85 (2021): Zeszyt 1 (June 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2335-8750
Pierwsze wydanie
16 Apr 2017
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Dealing with Not-Knowing in Inbound Open Innovation: A High-Tech Innovation Case

Data publikacji: 08 Oct 2021
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 85 (2021) - Zeszyt 1 (June 2021)
Zakres stron: 127 - 152
Otrzymano: 22 Dec 2020
Przyjęty: 30 Jul 2021
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2335-8750
Pierwsze wydanie
16 Apr 2017
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

Knowledge and innovation are two inseparable topics in the literature on knowledge management or innovation. Most often, when scholars write about knowledge management, they refer to innovation as the key objective. Some argue that using the knowledge available beyond a firm’s boundaries (open innovation) leads to increased innovativeness, while others talk of the knowledge-creating firm. However, current literature provides us with limited insights on how the innovation team deals with externally developed knowledge or how it comes into the innovation creation process. Managing teamwork innovation endeavours in technology development is challenging since the outcome is often uncertain as well as inputs along that path. This paper attempts to open the backbox of open innovation and suggests that innovating teams entwine externally developed knowledge through the process of dealing with not-knowing.

Keywords

1. Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Moedas, C. (2018). Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies // California Management Review. Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 5–16. doi: 10.1177/000812561774508610.1177/0008125617745086 Search in Google Scholar

2. Bolade, S., Sindakis, S. (2019). Micro-Foundation of Knowledge Creation Theory: Development of a Conceptual Framework Theory // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. doi: 10.1007/s13132-019-00623-210.1007/s13132-019-00623-2 Search in Google Scholar

3. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and Organization: A Social-practice Perspective // Organization Science. Vol.12, pp. 40–57. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116.10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116 Search in Google Scholar

4. Carlile, P. R. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development // Organization Science. Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 442–455. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.295310.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953 Search in Google Scholar

5. Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries // Organization Science. Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 555–568. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.009410.1287/orsc.1040.0094 Search in Google Scholar

6. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. – London: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

7. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge. – MA: Harvard Business School Press. Search in Google Scholar

8. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation. In Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm. ed. H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, J. West. – New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

9. Chesbrough, H. (2012a). Open Innovation: Where we’ve Been and Where We’re Going. Research & Technology // Management Journal, Vol. 55, No. 4. doi: 10.5437/08956308X550408510.5437/08956308X5504085 Search in Google Scholar

10. Chesbrough, H. (2012b). GE’s Ecomagination Challenge: An Experiment in Open Innovation // California Management Review. Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 110–154. doi: 10.1525/ cmr.2012.54.3.14010.1525/cmr.2012.54.3.140 Search in Google Scholar

11. Chesbrough, H., Appleyard M. M. (2007). Open Innovation strategy // California Management Review. Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 57–75. doi: 10.2307/4116641610.2307/41166416 Search in Google Scholar

12. Dahlander, L., Gann, D. M., Wallin, M. W. (2021). How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward // Research Policy. Vol. 50, Issue 4. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.10421810.1016/j.respol.2021.104218 Search in Google Scholar

13. Fredberg, T., Elmquist, M., Ollila, S. (2008). Managing Open innovations. Present findings and Future Directions. – VINNOVA (The Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems) report. The Chalmers University of Technology, March 2008. Search in Google Scholar

14. Gassmann O, Enkel E. (2004). Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. – Paper presented at the R&D Management Conference (RADMA), Lisbon, Portugal. July 2004. Search in Google Scholar

15. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation // R&D Management. Vol. 40, Issue 3, pp. 213–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x Search in Google Scholar

16. Jalonen. H., (2011). The Uncertainty of Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature // Journal of Management Research. Vol. 4, No. 1. doi: 10.5296/jmr.v4i1.103910.5296/jmr.v4i1.1039 Search in Google Scholar

17. Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions // Academy of Management Perspectives. – Academy of Management of Montreal, pp. 75–93. doi: 10.5465/amp.25.1.7510.5465/amp.25.1.75 Search in Google Scholar

18. Manresa, A., Mas-Machuca, M., Marimon, F. (2021). Unveiling the mechanisms to rescue the unknown knowledge // Journal of information and knowledge management. ISSN: 0219-6492 Search in Google Scholar

19. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. – Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

20. Newell S., Robertson M., Scarbrough H., Swan J. (2009). Managing Knowledge Work and Innovation. – London: Palgrave.10.1007/978-0-230-36641-1 Search in Google Scholar

21. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. – New York: Oxford University Press Inc. Search in Google Scholar

22. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. (2015). The Knowledge-creating Theory Revisited: Knowledge Creation as a Synthesizing Process. The Essentials of Knowledge Management, OR Essentials Series. ed. J. S. Edwards. – London: Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

23. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba, and Leadership: Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation // Long Range Planning. Vol. 33, pp. 5–34. doi: 10.1016/ S0024-6301(99)00115-6 Search in Google Scholar

24. Orlikowski, W., J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work // Organization Studies. Vol. 28, pp. 1435–1448. doi: 10.1177/017084060708113810.1177/0170840607081138 Search in Google Scholar

25. Ramasesh, V., R., Browning, T. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for Tackling Knowable Unknown Unknowns in Project Management // Journal of Operations Management. Vol. 32, Issues 4. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.00310.1016/j.jom.2014.03.003 Search in Google Scholar

26. Rumsfeld, D. (2011). Known and Unknown. A Memoir. – New York: Penguin Group. Search in Google Scholar

27. Scharmer, C., O. (2001). Self-transcending knowledge: Sensing and Organizing Around Emerging Opportunities // Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 137–151. doi: 10.1108/1367327011039318510.1108/13673270110393185 Search in Google Scholar

28. Scharmer, C., O. (2009). Theory U. Leading from the Future as it Emerges. – Oakland: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

29. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K, von Savigny, E. (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. – London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

30. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. – London: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

31. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. – Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

32. Whelan, E., Parise, S., de Valk, J., Aalbers, R. (2011). Creating Employee Networks That Deliver Open Innovation // MIT Sloan Management Review. Vol. 53, No. 1., pp. 1245–1269. Search in Google Scholar

33. Woods, J. A., Cortada, J. (2000). The Knowledge Management Yearbook 200-2001.– London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo