Self-Organisation Perspective to Responsible Innovation in Industry

1. Allen, P. M., Lesser, M. (1991). Evolutionary Human Systems: Learning, Ignorance and Subjectivity // In Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change, eds. P. P. Saviotti, J. S. Metcalfe. - Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers, p. 160–171.10.4324/9781351127707-7Search in Google Scholar

2. Armstrong, M., Cornut, G., Delacôte, S., Lenglet, M., Millo, Y., Muniesa, F., Tadjeddine, Y. (2012). Towards a Practical Approach to Responsible Innovation in Finance: New Product Committees Revisited // Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 147–168. doi: 10.1108/13581981211218289.10.1108/13581981211218289Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. - Sage.Search in Google Scholar

4. Berkhout, F. (2014). Sustainable Innovation Management. Innovation and Sustainability // In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, ed. M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, N. Phillips. - Oxford: University Press, p. 290–315.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.011Search in Google Scholar

5. Biggiero, L. (2001). Self-organizing Processes in Building Entrepreneurial Networks: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation // Human Systems Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, p. 209–222.10.3233/HSM-2001-20304Search in Google Scholar

6. Blok, V., Hoffmans, L., Wubben, E. F. M. (2015). Stakeholder Engagement for Responsible Innovation in the Private Sector: Critical Issues and Management Practices // Journal on Chain and Network Science. Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 147–164. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x003.10.3920/JCNS2015.x003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Blok, V., Lemmens, P. (2015). The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation / In Responsible Innovation Vol. 2, p. 19–35. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2.10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Scholten, V. E., Blok, V. (2015). Foreword: Responsible Innovation in the Private Sector // Journal on Chain and Network Science, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 101–105. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x006.10.3920/JCNS2015.x006Search in Google Scholar

9. Buenstorf, G. (2000). Self-organization and Sustainability: Energetics of Evolution and Implications for Ecological Economics // Ecological Economics, Vol. 33 No. 1, p. 119–134.10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00133-0Search in Google Scholar

10. Burget, M., Bardone, E., Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review // Science and engineering ethics, Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 1–19.10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1Search in Google Scholar

11. Cagnin, C., Amanatidou, E., Keenan, M. (2012). Orienting European Innovation Systems towards Grand Challenges and the Roles that FTA can Play // Science and public policy, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 140–152. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs014.10.1093/scipol/scs014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Castells, M. (2011). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture (Vol. 1). - John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

13. Čeičytė, J., Petraitė, M. (2014). Atsakingųjų inovacijų koncepcija // Viešoji politika ir administravimas. T. 13, Nr. 3, p. 400–413. doi: 10.5755/j01.ppaa.13.3.8302.10.5755/j01.ppaa.13.3.8302Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Chiles, T. H., Meyer, A. D., Hench, T. J. (2004). Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theaters // Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 5, p. 499–519.10.1287/orsc.1040.0095Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., Phillips, N. (2014). Perspectives on Innovation Management / The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. - Oxford: University Press, p. 3–25.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

16. European Commission (2008). European Cmmissions Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanotechnologies Research. Internet access: <http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf> [accessed September 3, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

17. European Commission (2011). DG Research Workshop on Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe. Internet access: <http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsibleresearch-and-innovation-workshop-newsletter_en.pdf> [accessed September 3, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

18. European Commission (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe’s Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges. Internet access: <https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf> [accessed September 3, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

19. Grumadaitė, K., Jucevičius, G. (2017). Preconditions for Emergence of Lithuanian Clusters: From Informal Cooperation to Its Legitimation // Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Vol. 77, No. 1, p. 37–56. doi: 10.1515/mosr-2017-0003.10.1515/mosr-2017-0003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Grunwald, A. (2014). Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation. In Responsible Innovation 1, p. 15–31. - Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_2Search in Google Scholar

21. Hellstrom, T. (2003). Systematic Innovation and Risk: Technology Assessment and the Challenge of Responsible Innovation // Technology in Society. Vol. 25, p. 369–384. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1.10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Lubberink, R., Blok, V., van Ophem, J., Omta, O. (2017). Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices // Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 5.10.3390/su9050721Search in Google Scholar

23. Lund Declaration (2009). Konferencija: Nauji pasauliai – naujos išeitys. Moksliniai tyrimai ir inovacijos kaip pagrindas Europos vystymuisi globaliame kontekste. Lundas, Švedija, 7–8 Liepa, 2009. Internet access: <http://www.se2009.eu/polopoly_fs/1.8460!menu/standard/file/lund_declaration_final_version_9_july.pdf> [accessed September 15, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

24. McKelvey, B. (2001). What is Complexity Science? It is Really Order-Creation Science // Emergence, A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management. Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 137–157.10.1207/S15327000EM0301_09Search in Google Scholar

25. Owen, R. (2009). A New Era of Responsible Innovation. Internet access: <http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/features/story.aspx?id=460&cookieConsent=A [accessed September 10, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

26. Owen, R., Bessant, J., Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. - John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118551424Search in Google Scholar

27. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society // Science and Public Policy. Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093.10.1093/scipol/scs093Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Palm, E., Hansson, S. O. (2006). The Case for Ethical Technology Assessment (eTA) // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 73, No. 5, p. 543–558. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002.10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Pandza, K., Ellwood, P. (2013). Strategic and Ethical Foundations for Responsible Innovation // Research Policy. Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 1112–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007.10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Pavie, X. (2012). The Importance of Responsible-Innovation and the Necessity of “Innovation-Care”. Internet access: <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2330132> [accessed September 10, 2017].10.2139/ssrn.2330132Search in Google Scholar

31. Pavie, X., Carthy, D. (2013). An Integration of Responsible Innovation in the Financial Sector through Design Thinking. Internet access: <http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/92/14/28/PDF/WP1324.pdf> [accessed September 15, 2017].10.2139/ssrn.2370396Search in Google Scholar

32. Pavie, X., Scholten, V., Carthy, D. (2014). Responsible Innovation: From Concept to Practice. Singapore: - World Scientific Publishing Co.10.1142/8903Search in Google Scholar

33. Petraite, M., Pavie, X., Ceicyte, J., Janiunaite, B., Carthy, D. (2017). Managing Innovation in Multicultural Environments: An Imperative of Responsibility Within Interorganizational Networks. In Intercultural Interactions in the Multicultural Workplace, p. 137–154. - Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-39771-9_10Search in Google Scholar

34. Plowman, D. A., Solansky, S., Beck, T. E., Baker, L., Kulkarni, M., Travis, D. V. (2007). The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization // The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 341–356.10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35. Pyka, A., Windrum, P. (2003). The Self-Organisation of Strategic Alliances // Economics of innovation and new technology, Vol. 12, No. 3, p. 245-268. doi: 10.1080/10438590290025561.10.1080/10438590290025561Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Rittel, H. W. M, Weber (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning // Policy Sciences, Vol. 4.10.1007/BF01405730Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37. Rycroft, R. W., Kash, D. E. (2004). Self-organizing innovation networks: implications for globalization // Technovation, Vol. 24, No. 3, p. 187–197.10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00092-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Stahl, B. C. (2013). Responsible Research and Innovation: The Role of Privacy in an Emerging Framework. Internet access: <http://spp.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/09/19/scipol.sct067.full.pdf+html> [accessed September 10, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

39. Stahl, B. C., McBride, N., Wakunuma, K., Flick, C. (2013). The Empathic Robot: A Prototipe of Responsible Research and Innovation. Internet access: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261563960_The_empathic_care_robot_A_prototype_of_responsible_research_and_innovation> [accessed September 10, 2017].10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.001Search in Google Scholar

40. Stilgoe, J. (2013). Foreword: Why Responsible Innovation? / In R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz (ed.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. - John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

41. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Internet access: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733313000930> [accessed September 10, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

42. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge Era // The Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 298–318. doi 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002.10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

43. Van den Hoven, J. (2013). Value Sensitive Design and Responsible Innovation. / In R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz (ed.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. - John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781118551424.ch4Search in Google Scholar

44. Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A Vision of Responsible Innovation. Internet access: <https://europa.eu/sinapse/sinapse/index.cfm?&fuseaction=lib.attachment&lib_id=B98F4473-BB94-B4A9-3B6749A0CC445DFA&attach=LIB_DOC_EN> [accessed September 10, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

45. Witt, U. (1998). Imagination and leadership–the neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 35, No. 2, p. 161–177.10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00058-4Search in Google Scholar