[Andreoni, J. and Bernheim, D.B. (2009), “Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects”, Econometrica, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 1607-1636.10.3982/ECTA7384]Search in Google Scholar
[Albert, M., Güth, W., Kirchler, E. and Maciejovsky, B. (2007), “Are we nice(r) to nice(r) people? An experimental analysis”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 53-69.10.1007/s10683-006-9131-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Armstrong S., Catherine, A. and Madrigal, R. (2015), “Anchors and norms in anonymous pay-what-you-want pricing contexts”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 167-175.10.1016/j.socec.2014.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ben-Ner, A., Putterman, L. and Ren, T. (2011), “Lavish returns on cheap talk: Two-way communication in trust games”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1-13.10.1016/j.socec.2010.09.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. and McCabe, J. (1995), “Trust, reciprocity, and social history”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 122-142.10.1006/game.1995.1027]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohnet, I. and Frey, B.S. (1999), “The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 43-57.10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00121-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolle, F. (1998), “Rewarding trust: An experimental study”, Theory and Decision, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 83-98.10.1023/A:1004930101743]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouckaert, J. and Dhaene, G. (2004), “Inter-ethnic trust and reciprocity: results of an experiment with small businessmen”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 869-886.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.08.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Brañas-Garza et al. (2013), “Moral cleansing and moral licensing: experimental evidence”, Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 199-212.10.1017/S0266267113000199]Search in Google Scholar
[Camerer, C.F. (2003), Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cárdenas, J.C. and Carpenter, J. (2008), “Behavioural development economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world”, The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 311-338.10.1080/00220380701848327]Search in Google Scholar
[Cason, T.N. and Mui, V.L. (1998), “Social influence in the sequential dictator game”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 2-3, pp. 248-265.10.1006/jmps.1998.1213]Search in Google Scholar
[Chandran, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2005), “Effects of participative pricing on consumers’ cognitions and actions: A goal theoretic perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 249-259.10.1086/432234]Search in Google Scholar
[Collett, J.L. and Childs, E. (2011), “Minding the gap: Meaning, affect, and the potential shortcomings of vignettes”, Social Science Research, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 513-522.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Dana, J., Weber, R.A. and Kuang, J.X. (2007), “Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness”, Economic Theory, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 67-80.10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Engel, C. (2011), “Dictator games: A meta study”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 583-610.10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Engle-Warnick, J. and Slonim, R.L. (2004), “The evolution of strategies in repeated trust games”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 553-573.10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Falk, A. and Kosfeld, M. (2006), “The hidden costs of control”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 1611-1630.10.1257/aer.96.5.1611]Search in Google Scholar
[Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000), “Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 159-181.10.1257/jep.14.3.159]Search in Google Scholar
[Fershtman, C. and Gneezy, U. (2001), “Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 1, pp. 351-377.10.1162/003355301556338]Search in Google Scholar
[Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J.L., Savin, N.E. and Sefton, M. (1994), “Fairness in simple bargaining experiments”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 347-369.10.1006/game.1994.1021]Search in Google Scholar
[Franzen, A. and Pointner, S. (2012), “anonymity in the dictator game revisited”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 74-81.10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Gautier, P.A. and van der Klaauw, B. (2012), “Selection in a field experiment with voluntary participation”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 27, pp. 63-84.10.1002/jae.1184]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerpott, T.J. (2017), “Pay-what-you-want pricing: An integrative review of the empirical research literature”, Management Science Letters, Vol. 7, pp. 35-62.10.5267/j.msl.2016.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerpott, T.J. (2016), “A review of the empirical literature on pay-what-you-want price setting”, Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 566-696.10.1515/mmcks-2016-0017]Search in Google Scholar
[Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.A. and Soutter, C.L. (2000), “Measuring trust”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 811-846.10.1162/003355300554926]Search in Google Scholar
[Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Riener, G. and Nelson, L.D. (2012), “Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets”, Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, No. 19, pp. 7236-7240.10.1073/pnas.1120893109]Search in Google Scholar
[Greiff, M. and Egbert, H. (2016), “A survey of the empirical evidence on PWYW pricing”, Bulgarian Economic Papers, BEP 02-2016, Sofia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilbert, L.P. and Suessmair, A. (2015), “The effects of social interaction and social norm compliance in pay-what-you-want situations”, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 5, pp. 548-556.10.4236/ajibm.2015.58054]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., Smith, V.L. (1994), “Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 346-380.10.1006/game.1994.1056]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. and Smith, V.L. (1996), “Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No.3, pp. 653-660.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, J., Goldsmith, K. and Mogilner, C. (2008), “Reinforcement versus balance response in sequential choice”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, pp. 229-239.10.1007/s11002-008-9042-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Iriberri, N. and Rey-Biel, P. (2011), “The role of role uncertainty in modified dictator games”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 160-180.10.1007/s10683-010-9261-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Jang, H, and Chu, W. (2012), “Are consumers acting fairly toward companies? an examination of pay-what-you-want pricing”, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 348-360.10.1177/0276146712448193]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, J.W. and Peng Cui, A. (2013), “To influence or not to influence: external reference price strategies in pay-what-you-want pricing”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 275-281.10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R. (1986), “Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 728-741.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.Y., Kaufmann, K. and Stegemann, M. (2014), “The impact of buyer-seller relationships and reference prices on the effectiveness of the pay what you want pricing mechanism”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, pp. 409-423.10.1007/s11002-013-9261-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2009), “Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 44-58.10.1509/jmkg.73.1.044]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2010), “Pay what you want: Relevance and consumer behavior”, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 147-169.10.1007/s11573-009-0345-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2014), “Sampling, discounts or pay-what-you-want: Two field experiments”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 327-334.10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.03.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawczyk, M., Kukla-Gryz, A. and Tyrowicz, J. (2015), “Pushed by the crowd or pulled by the leaders”, Working Paper No. 25/2015 (173), Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krzyżanowska, M. and Tkaczyk, J. (2016), “Pay-what-you-want as a participative pricing mechanism: Meta-analysis of development and knowledge dissemination”, International Journal of Management Cases, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 21-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kunter, M. (2015), “exploring the pay-what-you-want payment motivation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 2347-2357.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.044]Search in Google Scholar
[Lazear, E.P., Malmendier, U. and Weber, R.A. (2012), “Sorting in experiments with application to social preferences”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 136-163.10.1257/app.4.1.136]Search in Google Scholar
[Léon, F.J., Noguera, J.A. and Tena-Sánchez, J. (2012), “How much would you like to pay? Trust, reciprocity and prosocial motivations in El trato”, Social Science Information, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 389-417.10.1177/0539018412441756]Search in Google Scholar
[Machado, F. and Sinha, R.K. (2013), “The viability of pay what you want pricing”, Working Paper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mak, V., Zwick, R., Rao, A. and Pattaratanakun, J.A. (2015), “´Pay what you want´ as threshold public good provision”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 127, pp. 30-43.10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Mullen, E. and Monin, B. (2016), “Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 363-385.10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120]Search in Google Scholar
[Ortmann, A., Fitzgerald, J. and Boeing, C. (2000), “Trust, reciprocity, and social history: A reexamination”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 81-100.10.1023/A:1009946125005]Search in Google Scholar
[Racherla, P., Babb, J.S. and Keith, M.J. (2011), “Pay-what-you-want pricing for mobile applications: The effect of privacy assurances and social information”, Conference for Information Systems Applied Research Proceedings, Vol. 4, No. 1833, pp. 1-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Regner, T. and Riener, G. (2012), “Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the internet: A natural field experiment”, DICE Discussion Paper, No. 82, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).]Search in Google Scholar
[Riener, G. and Traxler, C. (2012), “Norms, moods, and free lunch: Longitudinal evidence on payments from a pay-what-you-want restaurant”, Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 476-483.10.1016/j.socec.2011.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruffle, B.J. (1998), “More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 247-265.10.1006/game.1997.0630]Search in Google Scholar
[Santana, S. and. Morwitz, V.G. (2013), “We’re in this together: How sellers, social values, and relationship norms influence consumer payments in pay-what-you-want contexts”, Working Paper.10.1037/e570052013-146]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, K.M., Spann, M. and Zeithammer, R. (2014), “Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets”, Management Science, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 1217-1236.10.1287/mnsc.2014.1946]Search in Google Scholar
[Schons, L.M., Rese, M., Wieseke, J., Rasmussen, W., Weber, D. and Strotmann, W.C. (2013), “there is nothing permanent except change: analyzing individual price dynamics in ‘pay-what-you-want’ situations”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 25-36.10.1007/s11002-013-9237-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Slonim, R. and Garbarino, E. (2008), “Increases in trust and altruism from partner selection: Experimental evidence”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 134-153.10.1007/s10683-007-9162-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, S. and Gierl, H. (2014), “Pay what you want: how to affect the price consumers are willing to pay”, Proceedings of the 13th ICORIA: International Conference on Research in Advertising, June 26-28 2014, Amsterdam.]Search in Google Scholar