The Regional Heterogeneity of Productivity Determinants: Evidence from Ukrainian Firms

Brown, J, David, J, Earle, S & Telegdy, Á 2006, ‛The productivity effects of privatization: longitudinal estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 61‑99. Available from: <http:// dx.doi.org/10.1086/499547>. [February 2006] 10.1086/499547Search in Google Scholar

Cieslik, A, Michalek, J & Nasadiuk, I 2015, ‘Determinants of export performance of Ukrainian firms’, Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 91‑103. Available from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2015.026 >.10.12775/EQUIL.2015.026Search in Google Scholar

Derzhkomstat 2015, Derzhavniy Komitet Statystyky Ukrainy. Available from <www.ukrstat.gov.ua>.Search in Google Scholar

Dettori, B, Marrocu, E & Paci, R 2012, ‘Total factor productivity, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European regions’, Regional Studies, vol. 46, pp. 1401‑1416.10.1080/00343404.2010.529288Search in Google Scholar

Earle, J & Gehlbach, S 2014, ‘Productivity consequences of political turnover: Firm-level evidence from Ukraine’s Orange Revolution’, IZA Discussion Paper no. 8510. Available from <ftp.iza.org/dp8510.pdf>. [September 2014] 10.2139/ssrn.2505372Search in Google Scholar

Kim, P H, Jacho-Chavez, D T, Kryvtsov, O, Shepotylo, O & Vakhitov, V 2015, ‘The evolution of firm-level distributions for Ukrainian manufacturing firms’, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 44, issue 1, pp. 148‑162. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147596715000864>. [February 2016]. DOI:10.1016/j. jce.2015.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

KVED-2005 classification 2005. Available from: <http://www. dkrp.gov.ua/info/842>.Search in Google Scholar

KVED-2010 classification 2010. Available from: <http://minfin. com.ua/taxes/-/normdoc/kved2010.html>.Search in Google Scholar

Levinsohn, J & Petrin, A 2003, ‘Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 317‑341. Available from: < https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/READINGS-Levinsohn-Petrin.pdf>. [6 August 2013]. DOI: 10.1111/1467-937X.00246.10.1111/1467-937X.00246Search in Google Scholar

Marrocu, E & Paci, R 2012, ‘Education or just creativity: what matters most for economic performance?’ Economic Geography, vol. 88, pp. 369‑401.10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01161.xSearch in Google Scholar

Melitz, M 2003, ‘The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1695-1725.10.1111/1468-0262.00467Search in Google Scholar

Pivovarsky, A 2003, ‘Ownership concentration and performance in Ukraine’s enterprises’, IMF Staff Papers, vol. 50, no. 1. Available from: <https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/.../Pivov.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

Shepotylo, O & Vakhitov, V 2015, ‘Services liberalization and productivity of manufacturing firms’, Economics of Transition, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-44.10.1111/ecot.12061Search in Google Scholar

Syverson, C 2011, ‘What determines productivity?’ Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 326-365.10.1257/jel.49.2.326Search in Google Scholar

Vega, SH & Elhorst, JP 2015, ‘The SLX model’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 55, pp. 339‑363.10.1111/jors.12188Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, J 2007, ‘Exports and productivity: A survey of the evidence from firm-level data’, World Economy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 60-82.10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00872.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wagner, J 2012, ‘International trade and firm performance: A survey of empirical studies since 2006’, Review of World Economy, vol. 148, pp. 235-267.10.1007/s10290-011-0116-8Search in Google Scholar