[1. Blom E.: Studies on seminal vesiculitis in the bull: II. Proposal for a new classification of the spermiogram, Med Weter 1981, 37, 239–242.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Deka D., Goswami R.N., Mili D.C., Nath D.R.: Effect of age of the sow and boar on reproduction performance. Indian Vet J 2002, 79, 615–616.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Fitzpatrick J.L., Lüpold S.: Sexual selection and the evolution of sperm quality. Mol Hum Reprod 2014, 20, 1180–1189.10.1093/molehr/gau06725323970]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Gil M.C., García-Herreros M., Barón F.J., Aparicio I.M., Santos A.J., García-Marín L.J.: Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology 2009, 71, 254–263.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.00718760833]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Górski K., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A., Nazaruk A.: The importance of ejaculate volume for the physical parameters of ejaculates and sperm morphology of Hypor boars. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2016, 22, 493–501.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Helfenstein F., Podevin M., Richner H.: Sperm morphology, swimming velocity, and longevity in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2010, 64, 557–565.10.1007/s00265-009-0871-x]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hirai M., Boersma A., Hoeflich A., Wolf E., Föll J., Aumüller R., Braun A.J.: Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): Relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J Androl 2001, 22, 104–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Humphries S., Evans J.P., Simmons L.W.: Sperm competition: linking form and function. BMC Evol Biol 2008, 8, 319–329.10.1186/1471-2148-8-319263267619032741]Search in Google Scholar
[9. King G.J., Macpherson J.W.: A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection. J Anim Sci 1973, 36, 563–565.10.2527/jas1973.363563x4693863]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Bajena M., Komorowska K., Kowalewski D.: Correlation of frequency of spermatozoa morphological alterations with sperm concentration in ejaculates of Polish Landrace boars. Acta Vet Beograd 2013, 63, 513–524.10.2298/AVB1306513K]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Mielnicka C.: The effect of age on the morphometric sperm traits of domestic pigs. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2005, 10, 3–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Wysokińska A., Sadowska A.: Ejaculate traits and spermatozoa morphology as related to spermatozoa concentration in ejaculates of Polish Large White boars. Anim Sci Pap Rep 2006, 24, 111–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Kondracki S., Górski K., Wysokińska A., Jóźwik I.: Correlation of ejaculate parameters and sperm morphology with the ejaculate volume of Pietrain boars. Bulg J Agric Sci 2014, 20, 721–727.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A., Górski K.: The use of sexual activity measurements to assess ejaculatory performance of boars. Arch Tierzucht 2013, 56, 1052–1059.10.7482/0003-9438-56-106]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Kondracki S., Wysokińska A., Iwanina M., Banaszewska D., Sitarz D.: Effect of sperm concentration in an ejaculate on morphometric traits of spermatozoa in Duroc boars. Pol J Vet Sci 2011, 14, 35–40.10.2478/v10181-011-0005-z21528709]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kowalewski D., Kondracki S., Górski K., Bajena M., Wysokińska A.: Effect of piggery microclimate on ejaculate performance of artificial insemination boars. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2016, 22, 225–232.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Łącka K., Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A.: Assessment of stallion semen morphology using two different staining methods, microscopic techniques, and sample sizes. J Vet Res 2016, 60, 99–104.10.1515/jvetres-2016-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Malo A.F., Gomendio M., Garde J., Lang-Lenton B., Soler A.J., Roldan E.R.S.: Sperm design and function. Biol Lett 2006, 22, 246–249.10.1098/rsbl.2006.0449161891717148374]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Maroto-Morales A., Ramon M., Garcia-Alvarez O., Soler A.J., Esteso M.C., Martinez-Pastor F., Perez-Guzman M.D., Garde J.J.: Characterization of ram (Ovis aries) sperm head morphometry using the Sperm-Class Analyzer. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 437–448.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Noorafshan A., Karbalay-Doust S.: A simple method for unbiased estimating of ejaculated sperm tail length in subject with normal and abnormal sperm motility. Micron 2010, 41, 95–99.10.1016/j.micron.2009.09.002]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Ordinance of the Polish Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development. Journal of Laws, No. 56, item 344, 15 February 2010. www.isap.sejm.gov.pl, Accessed: 08.04.2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Park C.S., Yi Y.J.: Comparison of semen characteristics, sperm freezability and testosterone concentration between Duroc and Yorkshire boars during seasons. Anim Reprod Sci 2002, 73, 53–61.10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00129-X]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Saravia F., Nunez-Martinez I., Moran J.M., Soler C., Muriel A., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Pena F.J.: Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 196–203.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.052]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Severa L., Machal L., Svabova L., Mamica O.: Evaluation of shape variability of stallion sperm heads by means of image analysis and Fourier descriptors. Anim Reprod Sci 2010, 119, 50–55.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.007]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Smital J., De Sousa L.L., Mohsen A.: Differences among breeds and manifestation of heterosis in AI boar sperm output. Anim Reprod Sci 2004, 80, 121–130.10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00142-8]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Smital J., Wolf J., De Sousa L.L.: Estimation of genetic parameters of semen characteristics and reproductive traits in AI boars. Anim Reprod Sci 2005, 86, 119–130.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.02315721663]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Mileham A.J., Holt W.V.: Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier Shape Descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J Androl 2001, 22, 382–394.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Waberski D., Magnus F., Ardon F., Petrunkina A.M., Weitzke K.F., Töpfer-Petersen E.: Binding of boar spermatozoa to oviductal epithelium in vitro in relation to sperm morphology and storage time. Reproduction 2006, 131, 311–318.10.1530/rep.1.0081416452724]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Wolf J.: Genetic parameters for semen traits in AI boars estimated from data on individual ejaculates. Reprod Domest Anim 2009, 44, 338–344.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01083.x19323799]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Wysokińska A., Kondracki S.: Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two-breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann Anim Sci 2014, 14, 559–571.10.2478/aoas-2014-0030]Search in Google Scholar