[Alberman, E.D. and H. Goldstein. 1970. “The At Risk Register: A Statistical Evaluation.” British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine 24: 129–135. Doi: http:/dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.24.3.129.10.1136/jech.24.3.12910592724249594]Search in Google Scholar
[Behr, A., E. Bellgardt, and U. Rendtel. 2005. “Extent and Determinants of Panel Attrition in the European Community Household Panel.” European Sociological Review 21: 489–512. Doi: http:/dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci037.10.1093/esr/jci037]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom, A.G. 2014. “Setting Priorities: Spurious Differences in Response Rates.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26: 245–255. Doi: http:/dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt023.10.1093/ijpor/edt023]Search in Google Scholar
[Binder, D. 1983. “On the Variances of Asymptotically Normal Estimators from Complex Surveys.” International Statistical Review 51: 279–292. Doi: http:/dx.doi.org/10.2307/1402588.10.2307/1402588]Search in Google Scholar
[Box, G.P. and D.R. Cox. 1964. “An Analysis of Transformations.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26: 211–252.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Browne, W.J. 2009. MCMC Estimation in MLwiN. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/mlwin/features/mcmc.html (accessed July 17, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Browne, W.J., F. Steele, M. Golalizadeh, and M.J. Green. 2009. “The Use of Simple Reparameterizations to Improve the Efficiency of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation for Multilevel Models with Applications to Discrete Time Survival Models.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 172: 579–598. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00586.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00586.x271832519649268]Search in Google Scholar
[Calderwood, L., I. Plewis, S.C. Ketende, and T. Mostafa. 2016. “Evaluating the Immediate and Longer-term Impact of a Refusal Conversion Strategy in a Large Scale Longitudinal Study.” Survey Research Methods 10: 225–236. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2016.v10i3.6275.]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M. and M. Ofstedal. 2009. “Keeping in Contact with Mobile Sample Members.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 183–203. Chichester: John Wiley. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743874.ch11.10.1002/9780470743874.ch11]Search in Google Scholar
[Durrant, G.B. and F. Steele. 2009. “Multilevel Modelling of Refusal and Non-Contact in Household Surveys: Evidence from six UK Government Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 172: 361–382. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00565.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00565.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Durrant, G.B., J. D’Arrigo, and F. Steele. 2011. “Using Paradata to Predict Best Times of Contact Conditioning on Household and Interviewer Influences.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 174: 1029–1049. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.00715.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.00715.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fumagalli, L., H. Laurie, and P. Lynn. 2013. “Experiments with Methods to Reduce Attrition in Longitudinal Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 176: 499–519. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01051.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01051.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. 2006. “Nonresponse Rates and Non-response Bias in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70: 646–675. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033.10.1093/poq/nfl033]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkes, D. and I. Plewis. 2006. “Modelling Non-Response in the National Child Development Study.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 169: 479–491. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00401.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00401.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, P., O. Kaminska, and H. Goldstein. 2014. “Panel Attrition: How Important is Interviewer Continuity?” Journal of Official Statistics 30: 443–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0028.10.2478/jos-2014-0028]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuter, F., K. Olson, J. Wagner, T. Yan, T.M. Ezzati-Rice, C. Casas-Cordero, M. Lemay, A. Peytchev, R.M. Groves, and T.E. Raghunathan. 2010. “Using Proxy Measures and Other Correlates of Survey Outcomes to Adjust for Non-Response: Examples from Multiple Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 173: 389–408. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00621.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00621.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Krzanowski, W.J. and D.J. Hand. 2009. ROC Curves for Continuous Data. Boca Raton, Fl: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781439800225.10.1201/9781439800225]Search in Google Scholar
[Laurie, H. and P. Lynn. 2009. “The Use of Respondent Incentives on Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 205–233. Chichester: John Wiley. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743874.ch12.10.1002/9780470743874.ch12]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, P. 2017. “From Standardised to Targeted Survey Procedures for Tackling Nonresponse and Attrition.” Survey Research Methods 11: 93–103. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i1.6734.]Search in Google Scholar
[McGonagle, K., M. Couper, and R. Schoeni. 2009. “An Experimental Text of a Strategy to Maintain Contact with Families Between Waves of a Panel Study.” Survey Practice 2(5).10.29115/SP-2009-0020]Search in Google Scholar
[Pepe, M.S. 2003. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. New York: OUP. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2005.s19.10.1198/jasa.2005.s19]Search in Google Scholar
[Peytchev, A., S. Riley, J. Rosen, and J. Murphy. 2010. “Reduction of Nonresponse Bias in Surveys Through Case Prioritization.” Survey Research Methods 4: 21–29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.3037.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plewis, I. 2007a. “Non-Response in a Birth Cohort Study: The Case of the Millennium Cohort Study.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10: 325–334. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645570701676955.10.1080/13645570701676955]Search in Google Scholar
[Plewis, I. (Ed.). 2007b. The Millennium Cohort Study: Technical Report on Sampling (4th Ed.). London: Institute of Education, University of London. Available at: http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/library-media/documents/Technical_Report_on_Sampling_4th_Edition.pdf (accessed July 17, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Plewis, I., S.C. Ketende, H. Joshi, and G. Hughes. 2008. “The Contribution of Residential Mobility to Sample Loss in a Birth Cohort Study: Evidence from the First two Waves of the Millennium Cohort Study.” Journal of Official Statistics 24: 365–385. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645570701676955.10.1080/13645570701676955]Search in Google Scholar
[Plewis, I., S.C. Ketende, and L. Calderwood. 2012. “Assessing the Accuracy of Response Propensities in Longitudinal Studies.” Survey Methodology 38: 167–171.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pudney, S. and N. Watson. 2013. If at First you Don’t Succeed? Fieldwork, Panel Attrition, and Health-Employment Inferences in BHPS and HILDA, Institute for Social and Economic Research Working Papers, No. 2013–27, ISER, University of Essex. Available at: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2013-27 (accessed July 17, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasbash, J., C. Charlton, W.J. Browne, M. Healy, and B. Cameron. 2009. MLwiN Version 2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/mlwin/download/manuals.html (accessed July 17, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[SAS Institute Inc. 2011. SAS/STAT® 9.3, User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Available at: https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63962/HTML/default/viewer.htm#titlepage.htm (accessed July 17, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators of the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 231–253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2017. “Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-indicators.” International Statistical Review 85: 143–163. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12159.10.1111/insr.12159]Search in Google Scholar
[Shlomo, N., C. Skinner, and B. Schouten. 2012. “Estimation of an Indicator of the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142: 201–211. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j/jspi.2011.07.008.10.1016/j.jspi.2011.07.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Skinner, C. and J. D’Arrigo. 2011. “Inverse Probability Weighting for Clustered Nonresponse.” Biometrika 98: 953–966. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asr058.10.1093/biomet/asr058]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2009. “Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 157–182. Chichester: John Wiley. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743874.ch10.10.1002/9780470743874.ch10]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2014. “Re-Engaging with Survey Non-Respondents: Evidence from Three Household Panels.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 177: 499–523. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12024.10.1111/rssa.12024]Search in Google Scholar