[Abdel-Monaim M.F., Abdel-Gaid M.A., El-Morsy M.E.-M.A. 2012. Efficacy of rhizobacteria and humic acid for controlling Fusarium wilt disease and improvement of plant growth, quantitative and qualitative parameters in tomato. ESci Journal of Plant Pathology 1: 39–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Abdul-Baki A.A. 1991. Tolerance of tomato cultivars and selected germplasm to heat stress. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 116(6): 1113–1116.10.21273/JASHS.116.6.1113]Search in Google Scholar
[Aman S., Rab A. 2013. Response of tomato to nitrogen levels with or without humic acid. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 29: 181–186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ameri A., Tehranifar A. 2012. Effect of humic acid on nutrient uptake and physiological characteristic Fragaria ananassa var. Camarosa. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 6: 77–79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Asri F.O., Demirtas E.I., Ari N. 2015. Changes in fruit yield, quality and nutrient concentrations in response to soil humic acid applications in processing tomato. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 21: 585–591.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldotto L.E.B., Baldotto M.A., Canellas L.P., Bressan-Smith R., Olivares F.L. 2010. Growth promotion of pineapple ‘Vitória’ by humic acids and Burkholderia spp. during acclimatization. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 34: 1593–1600. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-06832010000500012.10.1590/S0100-06832010000500012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Burkowska A., Donderski W. 2007. Impact of humic substances on bacterioplankton in eutrophic lake. Polish Journal of Ecology 55: 155–160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cacco G., Dell’Agnolla G. 1984. Plant growth regulator activity of soluble humic complexes. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 64: 225–228. DOI: 10.4141/cjss84-023.10.4141/cjss84-023]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chen Y., De Nobili M., Aviad T. 2004. Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: Magdoff F., Weil R.R. (Eds.), Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture. Boca Raton, CRC Press, pp. 103–130. DOI: 10.1201/9780203496374.ch4.10.1201/9780203496374.ch4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cimrin K.M., Yilmaz I. 2005. Humic acid applications to lettuce do not improve yield but do improve phosphorus availability. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil and Plant Science 55: 58–63. DOI: 10.1080/09064710510008559.10.1080/09064710510008559]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[El-Ghamry A.M., Abd El-Hai K.M., Ghoneem K.M. 2009. Amino and humic acids promote growth, yield and disease resistance of faba bean cultivated in clayey soil. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3: 731–739.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fahramand M., Moradi H., Noori M., Sobhkhizi A., Adibian M., Abdollahi S., Rigi K. 2014. Influence of humic acid on increase yield of plants and soil properties. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences 3: 339–341.]Search in Google Scholar
[FAO 2016. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx]Search in Google Scholar
[Farnia A., Moradi E. 2015. Effect of soil and foliar application of humic acid on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences 4(10), Special Issue: 706–716.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karakurt Y., Unlu H., Unlu H., Padem H. 2009. The influence of foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid on yield and quality of pepper. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil and Plant Science 59: 233–237. DOI: 10.1080/09064710802022952.10.1080/09064710802022952]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kazemi M. 2013. Vegetative and reproductive growth of tomato plants affected by calcium and humic acid. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences 2(11): 24–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kazemi M. 2014. Effect of foliar application of humic acid and calcium chloride on tomato growth. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences 3(3): 41–46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keeling A.A., McCallum K.R., Beckwith C.P. 2003. Mature green waste compost enhances growth and nitrogen uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) through the action of water-extractable factors. Bioresource Technology 90: 127–132. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00125-1.10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00125-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Khaled H., Fawy H.A. 2011. Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil and Water Research 6: 21–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mart I. 2007. Fertilizers, organic fertilizers, plant and agricultural fertilizers. Agro and Food Business Newsletter, pp. i–iv.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mauromicale G., Longo A.M.G., Lo Monaco A. 2011. The effect of organic supplementation of solarized soil on the quality of tomato fruit. Scientia Horticulturae 129: 189–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.024.10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.024]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McDonnell R., Holden N.M., Ward S.M., Collins J.F., Farrell E.P., Hayes M.H.B. 2001. Characteristics of humic substances in heathland and forested peat soils of the Wicklow Mountains. Biology and Environment 101: 187–197.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikkelsen R.L. 2005. Humic materials for agriculture. Better Crops with Plant Food 89: 6–7, 10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moraditochaee M. 2012. Effects of humic acid foliar spraying and nitrogen fertilizer management on yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Iran. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 7: 289–293.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Muscolo A., Vianello A. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34: 1527–1536. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8.10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ozkutlu F., Torun B., Cakmak I. 2006. Effect of zinc humate on growth of soybean and wheat in zinc-deficient calcareous soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37: 2769–2778. DOI: 10.1080/00103620600832167.10.1080/00103620600832167]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Patil R. 2010. Effect of potassium humate and depro-teinised juice (DPJ) on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat and jowar. Annals of Biological Research 1: 148–151.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pettit R.E. 2004. Organic matter, humus, humate, humic acid, fulvic acid and humin: their importance in soil fertility and plant health. CTI Research, 15 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarir M.S., Sharif M., Zeb A., Akhlaq M. 2005. Influence of different levels of humic acid application by various methods on the yield and yield components of maize. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 21: 75–81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Srinivasa Rao N.K., Shivashankara K.S., Laxman R.H. 2016. Abiotic Stress Physiology of Horticultural Crops. Springer, India. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2725-0.10.1007/978-81-322-2725-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tan K.H. 2003. Humic Matter in Soil and the Environment. Principles and Controversies. Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY, 408 p. DOI: 10.1201/9780203912546.10.1201/9780203912546]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Unlu H.O., Unlu H., Karakurt Y., Padem H. 2011. Changes in fruit yield and quality in response to foliar and soil humic acid application in cucumber. Scientific Research and Essays 6: 2800–2803. DOI: 10.5897/SRE11.304.10.5897/SRE11.304]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Varanini Z., Pinton R. 1995. Humic substances and plant nutrition. In: Behnke H.D., Lüttge U., Esser K., Kadereit J.W., Runge M. (Eds.), Progress in Botany 56: 97–117. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79249-6_5.10.1007/978-3-642-79249-6_5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Yildirim E. 2007. Foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid affect productivity and quality of tomato. Acta Agricul-turae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil and Plant Science 57: 182–186. DOI: 10.1080/09064710600813107.10.1080/09064710600813107]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zimmer G. 2004. Humates and humic substances. Bio-correct inputs for the Eco-farmer. ACRES 34(1): 1–2.]Search in Google Scholar