[Aebi H. 1984. Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology 105: 121–126. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05016-3.10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05016-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bacon C.W., Hinton D.M., Richardson M.D. 1994. A corn seedling assay for resistance to Fusarium moniliforme. Plant Disease 78: 302–305. DOI: 10.1094/PD-78-0302.10.1094/PD-78-0302]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bacon C.W., Yates I.E., Hinton D.M., Meredith F. 2001. Biological control of Fusarium moniliforme in maize. Environmental Health Perspectives 109, Supplement 2: 325–332. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109s2325.10.1289/ehp.01109s2325]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Beauchamp C., Fridovich I. 1971. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 44: 276–287. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8.10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chance B., Maehly A.C. 1955. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods in Enzymology 2: 764–775. DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8.10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crowley S., Mahony J., van Sinderen D. 2013. Current perspectives on antifungal lactic acid bacteria as natural bio-preservatives. Trends in Food Science and Technology 33: 93–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2013.07.004.10.1016/j.tifs.2013.07.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Das K., Roychoudhury A. 2014. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scav-engers during environmental stress in plants. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2: 53. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053.10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Franz C.M.A.P., Cho G-S., Holzapfel W.H., Gálvez A. 2010. Safety of lactic acid bacteria. In: Mozzi F., Raya R.R., Vignolo G.M. (Eds.), Biotechnology of Lactic Acid Bacteria: Novel Applications. Wiley-Blackwell, UK. DOI: 10.1002/9780813820866.ch19.10.1002/9780813820866.ch19]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gajbhiye M.H., Kapadnis B.P. 2016. Antifungal-activity-producing lactic acid bacteria as biocontrol agents in plants. Biocontrol Science and Technology 26: 1451–1470. DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2016.1213793.10.1080/09583157.2016.1213793]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[García-Limones C., Dorado G., Navas-Cortés J., Jiménez-Díaz R.M., Tena M. 2009. Changes in the re-dox status of chickpea roots in response to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris: apoplastic antioxidant enzyme activities and expression of oxidative stress-related genes. Plant Biology 11: 194–203. DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00095.x.10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00095.x19228326]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gherbawy Y.A., El-Tayeb M.A., Maghraby T.A., She-bany Y.M., El-Deeb B.A. 2012. Response of antioxidant enzymes and some metabolic activities in wheat to Fusarium spp. infections. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 60: 319–333. DOI: 10.1556/AAgr.60.2012.4.3.10.1556/AAgr.60.2012.4.3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Guo J., Brosnan B., Furey A., Arendt E., Murphy P., Coffey A. 2012. Antifungal activity of Lactobacillus against Microsporum canis, Microsporum gypseum and Epidermophyton floccosum. Bioengineered Bugs 3(2): 104–113. DOI: 10.4161/bbug.19624.10.4161/bbug.19624335733022539027]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gupta R., Srivastava S. 2014. Antifungal effect of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs LR14) derived from Lactobacillus plantarum strain LR/14 and their applications in prevention of grain spoilage. Food Microbiology 42: 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.005.10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.00524929709]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hamed H.A., Moustafa Y.A., Abdel-Aziz S.M. 2011. In vivo efficacy of lactic acid bacteria in biological control against Fusarium oxysporum for protection of tomato plant. Life Science Journal 8: 462–468. DOI: 10.7537/marslsj080411.60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kar M., Mishra D. 1976. Catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenoloxidase activities during rice leaf senescence. Plant Physiology 57: 315–319. DOI: 10.1104/pp.57.2.315.10.1104/pp.57.2.31554201516659474]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kharazian Z.A., Jouzani G.S., Aghdasi M., Khorvash M., Zamani M, Mohammadzadeh H. 2017. Biocontrol potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from corn silages against some plant pathogenic fungi. Biological Control 110: 33–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.bio-control.2017.04.004.10.1016/j.bio-control.2017.04.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kıvanc M., Kıvanc S.A., Pektas S. 2014. Screening of Lactic acid bacteria for antifungal activity against fungi. Journal of Food Processing & Technology 5(3): 310, 4 p. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000310.10.4172/2157-7110.1000310]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kumar M., Yadav V., Tuteja N., Johri A.K. 2009. Antioxidant enzyme activities in maize plants colonized with Piriformospora indica. Microbiology 155: 780–790. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.019869-0.10.1099/mic.0.019869-019246749]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Limanska N., Ivanytsia T., Basiul O., Krylova K., Biscola V., Chobert J-M., et al. 2013. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on germination and growth of tomato seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 35: 1587–1595. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-012-1200-y.10.1007/s11738-012-1200-y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mohammadi-Gholami A., Shams-Ghahfarokhi M., Kachuei R., Razzaghi-Abyaneh M. 2013. Isolation and identification of Fusarium species from maize and wheat and assessment of their ability to produce fumonisin B1. Modares Journal of Medical Sciences: Pathobiology 16: 53–64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakano Y., Asada K. 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology 22: 867–880. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232.10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Narasimha Murthy K., Malini M., Savitha J., Srinivas C. 2012. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) for the control of wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 18: 60–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oliveira P.M., Zannini E., Arendt E.K. 2014. Cereal fungal infection, mycotoxins, and lactic acid bacteria mediated bioprotection: from crop farming to cereal products. Food Microbiology 37: 78–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.06.003.10.1016/j.fm.2013.06.00324230476]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Oren L., Ezrati S., Cohen D., Sharon A. 2003. Early events in the Fusarium verticillioides-maize inter-action characterized by using a green fluorescent protein-expressing transgenic isolate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 1695–1701. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1695-1701.2003.10.1128/AEM.69.3.1695-1701.200315008112620861]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Patil M.M., Pal A., Anand T., Ramana K.V. 2010. Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from curd and cucumber. Indian Journal of Bio-technology 9: 166–172.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereira P., Ibáñez S.G., Agostini E., Etcheverry M. 2011a. Effects of maize inoculation with Fusarium verticillioides and with two bacterial biocontrol agents on seedlings growth and antioxidative enzymatic activities. Applied Soil Ecology 51: 52–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.08.007.10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.08.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pereira P., Nesci A., Castillo C., Etcheverry M. 2011b. Field studies on the relationship between Fusarium verticillioides and maize (Zea mays L.): Effect of biocontrol agents on fungal infection and toxin content of grains at harvest. International Journal of Agronomy, Article ID 486914, 7 p. DOI: 10.1155/2011/486914.10.1155/2011/486914]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Russo P., Arena M.P., Fiocco D., Capozzi V., Drider D., Spano G. 2017. Lactobacillus plantarum with broad antifungal activity: a promising approach to increase safety and shelf-life of cereal-based products. International Journal of Food Microbiology 247: 48–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.04.027.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.04.02727240933]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sorahinobar M., Niknam V., Ebrahimzadeh H., Soltanloo H. 2015. Differential antioxidative responses of susceptible and resistant wheat cultivars against Fusarium head blight. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences 4: 239–243.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torres M.A. 2010. ROS in biotic interactions. Physiologia Plantarum 138: 414–429. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01326.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01326.x20002601]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tropcheva R., Nikolova D., Evstatieva Y., Danova S. 2014. Antifungal activity and identification of Lactobacilli, isolated from traditional dairy product “katak”. Anaerobe 28: 78–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.05.010.10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.05.01024887637]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Varsha K.K., Priya S., Devendra L., Nampoothiri K.M. 2014. Control of spoilage fungi by protective lactic acid bacteria displaying probiotic properties. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 172: 3402–3413. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-014-0779-4.10.1007/s12010-014-0779-424532445]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Virtanen T., Pihlanto A., Akkanen S., Korhonen H. 2007. Development of antioxidant activity in milk whey during fermentation with lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology 102: 106–115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03072.x.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03072.x17184325]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Xing J., Wang G., Zhang Q., Liu X., Gu Z., Zhang H., et al. 2015. Determining antioxidant activities of lactobacilli cell-free supernatants by cellular antioxidant assay: a comparison with traditional methods. PLoS ONE 10: e0119058, 16 p. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119058.10.1371/journal.pone.0119058436624725789875]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan B., Zhao J., Fan D., Tian F., Zhang H., Chen W. 2017. Antifungal activity of Lactobacillus plantarum against Penicillium roqueforti in vitro and the preservation effect on Chinese steamed bread. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 41(3): e12969, 9 p. DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12969.10.1111/jfpp.12969]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar