[Agarwal A., Gupta S., Ahmed Z. 2007. Influence of plant densities on productivity of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under greenhouse in high altitude cold desert of Ladakh. Acta Horticulturae 756: 309-314. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.756.32.10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.756.32]Search in Google Scholar
[Aldrich R.J. 1987. Predicting crop yield reductions from weeds. Weed Technology 1: 199-206.10.1017/S0890037X00029535]Search in Google Scholar
[Al Othman Z.A., Ahmed Y.B.H., Habila M.A., Ghafar A.A. 2011. Determination of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin in Capsicum fruit samples using high performance liquid chromatography. Molecules 16: 8919-8929. DOI: 10.3390/molecules16108919.10.3390/molecules16108919]Search in Google Scholar
[Aminpanah H., Sharifi P., Firouzi S. 2012. Interference interactions of two species of Echinochloa genus with rice. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 72: 364-370. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392012000300010.10.4067/S0718-58392012000300010]Search in Google Scholar
[Aminpanah H. 2013. Influence of nitrogen rate on competition between two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv). International Journal of Biosciences 3: 90-103. DOI: 10.12692/ijb/3.4.90-103.10.12692/ijb/3.4.90-103]Search in Google Scholar
[Asaduzzaman M., Robbani M., Ali M., Hasan M.M., Begum M., Hasan M.M. et al. 2015. Mother bulb weight and plant density influence on seed yield and yield attributes of onion. International Journal of Vegetable Science 21: 98-108. DOI: 10.1080/19315260.2013.825897.10.1080/19315260.2013.825897]Search in Google Scholar
[Berry A.D., Stall W.M., Rathinasabapathi B., MacDonald G.E., Charudattan R. 2006. Aggressivity: cucumber vs. amaranth. Weed Technology 20: 986-991. DOI: 10.1614/wt-04-270.1.10.1614/WT-04-270.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhatti I.H., Ahmad R., Jabbar A., Nazir M.S., Mahmood T. 2006. Competitive behaviour of component crops in different sesame-legume intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8(2): 165-167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boatright S.R., McKissick J.C. 2004. 2003 Georgia farm gate value report. Area Report No. 04-01. The University of Georgia, College of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development, 182 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boughalleb N., El Mahjoub M. 2005. The effect of soil solarization on Phytophtora nicotianae Breda de Haan var. parasitica (Dastur) G.M. Waterhouse, responsable for syndrome associating root rots and damping-off of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Tunisia. Tropicultura 23: 169-176. [in French with English abstract]]Search in Google Scholar
[Carvalho S.J.P., Buissa J.A.R., Nicolai M., López-Ovejero R.F., Christoffoleti P.J. 2006. Differential susceptibility of Amaranthus genus weed species to the herbicides trifloxysulfuron-sodium and chlorimuron-ethyl. Planta Daninha 24: 541-548. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582006000300017. [in Portuguese with English abstract]10.1590/S0100-83582006000300017]Search in Google Scholar
[Dekker J. 2011. Evolutionary ecology of weeds. Weed Biology Laboratory, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA, 305 p. www.agron.iastate.edu/~weeds/AG517/517Course/EEWbook.html (last accessed 6 April 2016)]Search in Google Scholar
[de Wit C.T., Goudriaan J. 1978. Simulation of ecological processes. Simulation Monographs. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (PU-DOC), Wageningen, The Netherlands, 175 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Wit C.T. 1960. On competition. Verslagen van landbouwkundige onderzoekingen 66:1-82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ewel J.J. 1986. Designing agricultural ecosystems for the humid tropics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 245-271. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001333.10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001333]Search in Google Scholar
[FAOSTAT 2013. Pepper. http://faostat3.fao.org (last accessed 6 April, 2016)]Search in Google Scholar
[Fetene M. 2013. Intra- and inter-specific competition between seedlings of Acacia etbaica and a perennial grass (Hyparrenia hirta). Journal of Arid Environments 55: 441-451. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00052-1.10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00052-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer A.J., Ramírez H.V., Gibson K.D., da Silveira Pinheiro B. 2001. Competitiveness of semidwarf upland rice cultivars against palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha) and signalgrass (B. decumbens). Agronomy Journal 93: 967-973. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2001.935967x.10.2134/agronj2001.935967x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fridley J.D. 2001. The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? Oikos 93: 514-526. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930318.x.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930318.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzalez L., Souto X.C., Bolano J.C., Reigosa M.J. 1992. Allelopathic potential of different accessions of Capsicum annuum L. application to weed management. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Congress of the Spanish Weed Science Society, pp. 367-372.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzalez L., Souto X.C., Reigosa M.J. 1993. Potential of different pepper cultivars (Capsicum annuum L.) as weed controllers by allelopathy agents in Galicia (North Spain). In: 8th EWRS Symp.: Quantitative approaches in weed and herbicide research and their practical application. Braunschweig, Germany, pp. 143-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gough R.E. 2001. Color of plastic mulch affects lateral root development but not root system architecture in pepper. HortScience 36: 66-68.10.21273/HORTSCI.36.1.66]Search in Google Scholar
[Hager A.G., Wax L.M., Stoller E.W., Bollero G.A. 2002. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in soybean. Weed Science 50: 607-610. DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0607:CWARII]2.0.CO;2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harper J.L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, University of California, USA, 892 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hachem M.W. 2003. Flore adventices de la culture de piment. Projet de Fin d’Étude. Superior Institute Agronomic (Ex ESHE), Chott-Meriem, Sousse, Tunisia, 36 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman M.L., Buhler D.D. 2002. Utilizing Sorghum as a functional model of crop–weed competition. I. Establishing a competitive hierarchy. Weed Science 50: 466-472. DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0466:USAAFM]2.0.CO;2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holm L., Doll J., Holm E., Pancho J., Herberger J. 1997. World weeds: natural histories and distribution. John Wiley & Sons, 1129 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jala A., Wongsarasin A. 2012. Effect of allelochemical from Amaranthus lividus L. on the germination of chili (Capsicum frutescens L.). Thai Journal of Science and Technology 1: 25-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kato-Noguchi H., Tanaka Y. 2003. Effects of capsaicin on plant growth. Biologia Plantarum 47: 157-159. DOI: 10.1023/A:1027317906839.10.1023/A:1027317906839]Search in Google Scholar
[Lahbib K., Bnejdi F., El-Gazzah M. 2012. Genetic diversity evaluation of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Tunisia based on morphologic characters. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 3413-3417. DOI: 10.5897/ajar11.2171.10.5897/AJAR11.2171]Search in Google Scholar
[Laird R.A., Aarssen L.W. 2005. Size inequality and the tragedy of the commons phenomenon in plant competition. Plant Ecology 179: 127-131. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-004-6737-4.10.1007/s11258-004-6737-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Markham J., Halwas S. 2011. Effect of neighbour presence and soil volume on the growth of Andropogon gerardii Vitman. Plant Ecology & Diversity 4: 265-268. DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2011.618515.10.1080/17550874.2011.618515]Search in Google Scholar
[McGilchrist C.A., Trenbath B.R. 1971. A revised analysis of plant competition experiments. Biometrics 27: 659-671. DOI: 10.2307/2528603.10.2307/2528603]Search in Google Scholar
[Morales-Payan J.P., Charudattan R., Stall W.M., DeValerio J.T. 2003. Surfactants affect the efficacy of the potential mycoherbicide Phomopsis amaranthicola to suppress Amaranthus lividus in bell pepper. Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society 56, Section XI, p. 326.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morales-Payan J.P., Charudattan R., Stall W.M., DeValerio J. 2002. Time and number of application of the mycoherbicide Phomopsis amaranthicola affect Amaranthus lividus interference with pepper. Phytopathology 92(6) Suppl.: 58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morales-Payan J.P., Santos B.M., Stall W.M., Bewick T.A. 1999. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on the competitive interactions of cilantro (Coriandrum sativum) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants 4: 59-66. DOI: 10.1300/J044v06n04_07.10.1300/J044v06n04_07]Search in Google Scholar
[Morales-Payan J.P., Stall W.M. 2002. Time of removal and population density effects of livid amaranth (Amaranthus lividus) on bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). HortScience 37: 747-748.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy T.R., Colin D.L., Dickens R., Everest J.W., Hall D., McCarty L.B. 2010. Weeds of Southern turfgrasses. Special Bulletin 31. Cooperative extension service, College of Agricultural and environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, 208 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson W.C., Jackson L.E., Ochoa O., van Wijk R., Peleman J., St. Clair D.A., Michelmore R.W. 2000. Lettuce, a shallow-rooted crop, and Lactuca serriola, its wild progenitor, differ at QTL determining root architecture and deep soil water exploitation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 1066-1073. DOI: 10.1007/s001220051581.10.1007/s001220051581]Search in Google Scholar
[Jolliffe P.A., Gaye M.M. 1995. Dynamics of growth and yield component responses of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to row covers and population density. Scientia Horticulturae 62: 153-164. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4238(95)00766-M.10.1016/0304-4238(95)00766-M]Search in Google Scholar
[Price T.D., Qvarnström A., Irwin D.E. 2003. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 1433-1440. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2372.10.1098/rspb.2003.2372169140212965006]Search in Google Scholar
[Procópio S.O., Santos J.B., Silva A.A., Martinez C.A., Werlang R.C. 2004. Physiological caracteristics of soybean and common bean crops and three weed species. Planta Daninha 22: 211-216. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582004000200006. [in Portuguese with English abstract]10.1590/S0100-83582004000200006]Search in Google Scholar
[Quintero I., Barraza F. 2009. Population density and phenotype plasticity of chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) c.v. Cayene Long Slim. Intropica 4: 55-66. [in Portuguese with English abstract]]Search in Google Scholar
[Radhouane L., Rhim T. 2014. Allelopathic interaction of pepper (Capsicum annuum) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) intercropped. International Journal of Environment 3: 32-40. DOI: 10.3126/ije.v3i1.9940.10.3126/ije.v3i1.9940]Search in Google Scholar
[Ronchi C.P., Silva A.A. 2006. Effects of weed species competition on the growth of young coffee plants. Planta Daninha 24: 415-423. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582006000300001.10.1590/S0100-83582006000300001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarkar R.K., Chakraborty A. 2000. Biological feasibility and economic viability of intercropping pulse and oilseed crops with sesame (Sesamum indicum) under different planting patterns in rice-fallow gangetic alluvial land. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 70: 211-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarkar R.K., Kundu C. 2001. Sustainable intercropping system of sesame (Sesamum indicum) with pulse and oilseed crops on rice fallow land. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 71: 90-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarkar R.K., Sanyal S.R. 2000. Production potential and economic feasibility of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) based intercropping system with pulse and oilseed crops on rice fallow land. Indian Journal of Agronomy 45: 545-550.]Search in Google Scholar
[Silva A.F., Concenço G., Aspiazú I., Ferreira E.A., Galon L., Coelho A.T.C.P., Silva A.A., Ferreira F.A. 2009. Interference of different weed densities in soybean growth. Planta Daninha 27: 75-84. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582009000100011. [in Portuguese with English abstract]10.1590/S0100-83582009000100011]Search in Google Scholar
[Spehia R.S., Sharma V., Raina J.N., Bhardwaj R.K. 2014. Growth, yield and economics of greenhouse grown coloured capsicum as influenced by trellis system and plant spacing. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84:742-745.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tétard-Jones C., Kertesz M.A., Preziosi R.F. 2011. Quantitative trait loci mapping of phenotypic plasticity and genotype–environment interactions in plant and insect performance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 1368-1379. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0356.10.1098/rstb.2010.0356308157821444311]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsuchiya K., Lee J.W., Hoshina T. 1994. Allelopathic potential of red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 28: 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wahla I.H., Ahmad R., Ehsanullah, Ahmad A., Jabbar A. 2009. Competitive functions of components crops in some barley based intercropping systems. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 11: 69-72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiersema J.H., León B. 2013. World economic plants. A standard reference, 2 ed., CRC Press, 1336 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams A.C., McCarthy B.C. 2001. A new index of interspecific competition for replacement and additive designs. Ecological Research 16: 29-40. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00368.x.10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00368.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Yachi S., Loreau M. 2007. Does complementary resource use enhance ecosystem functioning? A model of light competition in plant communities. Ecology Letters 10: 54-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00994.x.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00994.x17204117]Search in Google Scholar
[Zarochentseva O. 2012. Adaptation of methodology calculation relative crowding coefficient for evaluation competition of three species in polyculture. In: 18th International Scientific Conference: “Economics for Ecology”. Sumy, Ukraine, p. 196-197.]Search in Google Scholar