[1. A. Ribeiro, A.P. Antunes, and A. Páez, “Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 18, pp. 125–132, 2010.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[2. B. Linneker, “Transport Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development in Europe: A Review of Theoretical and Methodological Approaches”, Report to SASI Project. TRP 133. Sheffield, Department of Town and Regional Planning, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. C. Koopmans, P. Rietveld, and A. Huijg, 2012. “An accessibility approach to railways and municipal population growth, 1840-1930”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 25, pp. 98-104, 2012.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.031]Search in Google Scholar
[4. C. Schürman, K. Spiekermann, and M. Wegener, “Accessibility indicators”. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung, 39, IRPUD, Dortmund, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. D. Biehl, (Ed.), “The Contribution of Infrastructure to Regional Development”, Final Report of the Infrastructure Studies Group to the Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. D. Biehl, “The role of infrastructure in regional development ”, In R.W. Vickerman (Ed.): Infrastructure and Regional Development, European Research in Regional Science, London, Pion, vol. 1, pp. 9-35, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. D. Keeble, J. Offord, and S. Walker, Peripheral Regions in a Community of Twelve Member States, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1988.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. D. Keeble, P.L. Owens, and C. Thompson, “Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European Community”, Regional Studies, vol. 16, pp. 419-432, 1982.10.1080/09595238200185421]Search in Google Scholar
[9. E. López, J. Gutiérrez, and G. Gómez, “Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: an accessibility approach”, European Planning Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 277-301, 2008.10.1080/09654310701814629]Search in Google Scholar
[10. ESPON 1.2.1, Transport Services and Networks: Territorial Trends and Basic Supply of Infrastructure for Territorial Cohesion, Final Report, Tours: University of Tours, http://www.espon.eu., 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. F. Bruinsma, and P. Rietveld, “Urban agglomerations in European infrastructure networks”, Urban Studies, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 919–934, 1993.10.1080/00420989320080861]Search in Google Scholar
[12. F.P. van den Heuvel, L. Rivera, K. H. van Donselaar, A. de Jong, Y. Sheffi, P.W. de Langen, and J. C. Fransoo,“Relationship between freight accessibility and logistics employment in US counties”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 59, pp. 91–105, 2014.10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[13. G. Chi, “The impacts of highway expansion on population change: an integrated spatial approach”, Rural Sociology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 58–89, 2010.10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00003.x]Search in Google Scholar
[14. G. Chi, “The impacts of transport accessibility on population change across rural, suburban and urban areas: a case study of Wisconsin at sub-county levels”, Urban Studies, vol. 49, pp. 2711–2731, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. G. Törnqvist, “Contact Systems and Regional Development“, Lund Studies in Geography B vol. 35. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup, 1970.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. J. Berechman, “Urban and regional economic impacts of transportation investment: a critical assessment and proposed methodology“, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 28, no.4, pp. 351–362, 1994.10.1016/0965-8564(94)90009-4]Search in Google Scholar
[17. J. Berechman, and R. Paaswell, “Accessibility improvements and local employment: an empirical analysis”, Journal of Transportation Statistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49–66, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. J. Berechmen, D. Ozmen, and K. Ozbay, “Empirical analysis of transportation investment and economic development at state, county and municipality levels”, Transportation, vol. 33, pp. 537–551, 2006.10.1007/s11116-006-7472-6]Search in Google Scholar
[19. J. Bröcker, and K. Peschel, Trade. In W. Molle, R. Cappelin, (Eds.), Regional Impact of Community Policies in Europe, Aldershot: Avebury,1988.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. C. Martín, J. Gutiérrez, and C. Román, “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Index to Measure the Accessibility Impacts of New Infrastructure Investments: The Case of the High-speed Train Corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French Border”, Regional Studies, vol. 38, no 6, pp. 697 – 712, 2004.10.1080/003434042000240987]Search in Google Scholar
[21. J. Gutiérrez, “Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis border”. Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 229–242, 2001.10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5]Search in Google Scholar
[22. J. Gutiérrez, A. Condeço-Melhorado, and J. C. Martín, “Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 18, pp. 141-152, 2010.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[23. J. Gutiérrez, R. González, and G.Gómez, “The European high-speed train network: predicted effects on accessibility patterns”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 4, pp. 227–238, 1996.10.1016/S0966-6923(96)00033-6]Search in Google Scholar
[24. J. M. Morris, P.L. Dumble, and M.R. Wigan, “Accessibility indicators for transportation planning”, Transportation Research A, vol. 13, pp. 91–109, 1979.10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8]Search in Google Scholar
[25. K. Ozbay, D. Ozmen, and J. Berechman, “Modeling and analysis of the link between accessibility and employment growth”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 385–393, 2006.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:5(385)]Search in Google Scholar
[26. K. Spiekermann, and M. Wegener, “Trans-European Networks and unequal accessibility in Europe”, European Journal of Regional Development, vol. 4, pp. 35-42, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. K.T. Geurs, and B. van Wee, “Accessibility of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 12, pp. 127–140, 2004.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[28. K.T. Geurs, and J.R. Ritsema van Eck, “Accessibility measures: review and applications”, RIVM Report 408505 006, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. M. Wegener, H. Eskelinnen, F. Fürst, C. Schürmann, and K. Spiekermann, “Criteria for the Spatial Differentiation of the EU Territory: Geographical Position”, Forschungen 102.2, Bonn: Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. P. Gould, “Spatial Diffusion”, Resource Paper No. 17, Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers, 1969.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. P. Jiwattanakulpaisarn, R.P. Noland, and D.J. Graham, “Causal linkages between highways and sector-level employment”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 44, pp. 265–280, 2010.10.1016/j.tra.2010.01.008]Search in Google Scholar
[32. R.J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, and M. Watts, The Dictionary of Human Geography, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. R. Thompson, and E. Taniguchi, “City logistics and freight transport”, In: A.M. Brewer, K.J. Button, D.A. Hensher, (Eds.), The Handbook of Logistics and Supply-Chain Management, Handbooks in Transport, no 2. Pergamon, Elsevier, London, pp. 393–404, 2001.10.1108/9780080435930-025]Search in Google Scholar
[34. R. W. Vickerman, “Accessibility, attraction, and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility”, Environment and Planning A vol. 6, pp. 675–691, 1974.10.1068/a060675]Search in Google Scholar
[35. R.W. Vickerman, Introduction. In R.W. Vickerman (ed.), Infrastructure and Regional Development, London: Pion, pp. 1-8, 1991a.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. S.L. Handy, and D.A. Niemeier, “Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives”, Environment and Planning A, vol. 29, pp. 1175–94, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. S. Karou, and A. Hull, “Accessibility modelling: predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 35, pp. 1–11, 2014.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Study Programme on European Spatial Planning Working Group, 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION Final Report Part 1, Prepared by the National Focal Points of Finland, France and Germany Draft 12, January 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. T. Kramberger, V. Potočan, & V. M. Ipavec, Sustainable Logistics and Strategic Transportation Planning, University of Maribor, Slovenia, pp. 248-272, ISBN13: 9781522500018; EISBN13: 9781522500025, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0001-8.ch012, 2016.10.4018/978-1-5225-0001-8.ch012]Search in Google Scholar
[40. U. Blum, “Effects of transportation investments on regional growth: a theoretical and empirical investigation”, Regional Science Association vol. 49, pp. 169-184, 1982.10.1007/BF01939882]Search in Google Scholar
[41. J. Hong, “Transport and the location of foreign logistics firms: the Chinese experience”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 41, pp. 597–609, 2007.10.1016/j.tra.2006.11.004]Search in Google Scholar