[Arriaza, M., Canas-Ortega, J., Canas-Madueno, J., Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69 (1), 115-125.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029]Search in Google Scholar
[Barroso, F.L., Pinto-Correia, T., Ramos, I.L., Surová, S., Menezes, H. (2012). Dealing with landscape fuzziness in user preference studies: Photo-based questionnaires in the Mediterranean context. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, 329- 342.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergen, S.D., Ulbricht, C.A., Fridley, J.L., Ganter, M.A. (1995). The validity of computer generated graphic images of forest landscapes. Journal of. Environmental Psychology. 1510.1016/0272-4944(95)90021-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Buijs, E., Pedroli, B., Luginbu, Y. (2006). From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: Changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape Ecology, 21, 375-389.10.1007/s10980-005-5223-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Bulut, Z., Yilmaz, H. (2008). Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: A case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141 (1), 121-129.10.1007/s10661-007-9882-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Bulut, Z., Yilmaz, H. (2009). Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 154 (1), 459-468.10.1007/s10661-008-0412-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Brush, R., Chenoweth, R. E., Barman, T. (2000). Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47, 39-45.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00073-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Claval. P. (2005). Reading the rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 9-19.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of Europe. (1996). Pan-European biological and landscape diversity strategy. Nature and Environment. Council of Europe Press, Strasbourg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of Europe. (2000). Landscape European convention. Council of Europe, Florence, Italy.]Search in Google Scholar
[DeLucio, J. V., Múgica, M. (1994). Landscape preferences and behaviour of visitors to Spanish national parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29(2-3), 145-160.10.1016/0169-2046(94)90024-8]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., López-Santiago, C. A., Aguilera, P. A. Montes, C. (2012). The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 19-20, 136-146.10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., Fry, G., (2007). The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, 22, 959-972. 10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x]Search in Google Scholar
[de Val, G. D. L. F., Atauri, J. A., de Lucio, J. V. (2006). Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: a test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 77(4), 393-407.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Hietala-Koivu, R. (1999) Agricultural landscape change: A case study in Ylane, southeast Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 46, 103-108.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00051-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Howley, P., Donoghue, C. O., Hynes, S. (2012). Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, 66-74.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[IDESCAT (2013). Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya. Retrieved January 3, 2013, from www.idescat.cat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature. A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindemann-Matthies, P., Briegel, R., Schüpbach, B., Junge, X. (2010). Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: The impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning,98(2), 99-109.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Llausàs, A., Ribas, A., Varga, D., Vila, J. (2009). The evolution of agrarian practices and its effects on the structure of enclosure landscapes in the Alt Empordà (Catalonia, Spain), 1957-2001. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129, 73-82.10.1016/j.agee.2008.07.005]Search in Google Scholar
[López-Santiago, C. (1994). Lo universal y lo cultural en la estética del paisaje. Un experimento transcultural de percepción del paisaje. Dissertation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. ]Search in Google Scholar
[McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J. (1994). FRAGSTATS-Spatial Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351, Corvallis, OR.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCullagh P, Nelder J. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. Second Edition. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Misgrav, A. (2000). Visual preference of the public for vegetation groups in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 143-159.10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00038-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Nohl, W. (2001). Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception-preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 223-237.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00138-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinto-Correia, T., Barroso, F., Surová, D., Menezes, H. (2011). The fuzziness of Montado landscapes: Progress in assessing user preferences through photo-based surveys. Agroforest Syst, 82, 209-224.10.1007/s10457-010-9347-2]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team. R. (2014). A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved March 30, 2014, from URL http://www.r-project.org/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogge, E., Nevens, F., Gulinck, H. (2007). Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning. 82, 159-174.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006]Search in Google Scholar
[SIGPAC (2012). Departament d'Agricultura, Ramaderia, Pesca, Alimentació i Medi Natural, Generalitat de Catalunya.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strumse, E. (1994). Environmental Attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 293-303.10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80220-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Strumse, E. (1996). Demographic differences in visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 17-31.10.1006/jevp.1996.0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Sullivan, W. C., Anderson, O. M., Lovell, S. T. (2004). Agricultural buffers at the rural- urban fringe: an examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the Midwestern United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2), 299-313.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.036]Search in Google Scholar
[Surová, D., Surovy, P., Almeida Ribero, N., Pinto-Correia, T. (2011). Integrating differentiated landscape preferences in a decision support model for the multifunctional management of the Montado. Agroforest Syst, 82, 225-237.10.1007/s10457-011-9373-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Svobodova, K., Vondrus, J., Filova, L., Besta, M. (2011). The role of familiarity with the landscape in visual landscape preferences. Journal of Landscape Studies, 4, 11-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Termorshuizen, J. Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol, 24, 1037-1052.10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes.Landscape and urban planning, 13, 29-44.10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S.L. (2006). New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 362-372.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.11.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Van den Berg, A.E., Vlek, C.A.J., Coeterier, J.F. (1998). Group differences in the aesthetic valuation of nature development plans: A multilevel approach. J. Environ. Psycol. 18, 141-157.10.1006/jevp.1998.0080]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker, A.J., Ryan, R.L. (2008). Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: A Maine case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86, 141-152. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.02.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinstoerffer, J., Girardin, P. (2000). Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: use of a landscape indicator. Ecol. Modell., 130, 95-109.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00209-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Zube, E.H., Sella, J.L., Taylor, J.G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1-33. 10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0]Search in Google Scholar