This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Anick, D.J. (2007). The octave potencies convention: A mathematical model of dilution and succussion. Homeopathy, 96(3), 202–208.AnickD.J.2007The octave potencies convention: A mathematical model of dilution and succussion96320220810.1016/j.homp.2007.03.008Search in Google Scholar
Arora, S.K., Porter, A.L., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2013). Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: An updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics, 95(1), 351–370.AroraS.K.PorterA.L.YoutieJ.ShapiraP.2013Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: An updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs95135137010.1007/s11192-012-0903-6Search in Google Scholar
Bartol, T., & Stopar, K. (2015). Nano language and distribution of article title terms according to power laws. Scientometrics, 103(2), 435–451.BartolT.StoparK.2015Nano language and distribution of article title terms according to power laws103243545110.1007/s11192-015-1546-1Search in Google Scholar
Binnig, G., Quate, C.F., & Gerber, C. (1986). Atomic force microscope. Physical Review Letters, 56(9), 930–933.BinnigG.QuateC.F.GerberC.1986Atomic force microscope56993093310.1007/978-94-011-1812-5_4Search in Google Scholar
Borgatti, S.P., & Everett, M.G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375–395.BorgattiS.P.EverettM.G.1999Models of core/periphery structures21437539510.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2Search in Google Scholar
Bottero, J.Y., Auffan, M., Borschnek, D., Chaurand, P., Labille, J., Levard, C., Masion, A., Tella, M., Rose, J., & Wiesner, M.R. (2015). Nanotechnology, global development in the frame of environmental risk forecasting. A necessity of interdisciplinary researches. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 347(1), 35–42.BotteroJ.Y.AuffanM.BorschnekD.ChaurandP.LabilleJ.LevardC.MasionA.TellaM.RoseJ.WiesnerM.R.2015Nanotechnology, global development in the frame of environmental risk forecasting3471354210.1016/j.crte.2014.10.004Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, L. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.FreemanL.1977A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness401354110.2307/3033543Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, L.C., Borgatti, S.P., & White, D.R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs—A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13(2), 141–154.FreemanL.C.BorgattiS.P.WhiteD.R.1991Centrality in valued graphs—A measure of betweenness based on network flow13214115410.1016/0378-8733(91)90017-NSearch in Google Scholar
Fu, H.Z., & Ho, Y.S. (2015). Top cited articles in thermodynamic research. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 24(1), 68–85.FuH.Z.HoY.S.2015Top cited articles in thermodynamic research241688510.1134/S1810232815010075Search in Google Scholar
Garner, J., Porter, A.L., & Newman, N.C. (2014). Distance and velocity measures: Using citations to determine breadth and speed of research impact. Scientometrics, 100(3), 687–703.GarnerJ.PorterA.L.NewmanN.C.2014Distance and velocity measures: Using citations to determine breadth and speed of research impact100368770310.1007/s11192-014-1316-5Search in Google Scholar
Gorjiara, T., & Baldock, C. (2014). Nanoscience and nanotechnology research publications: A comparison between Australia and the rest of the world. Scientometrics, 100(1), 121–148.GorjiaraT.BaldockC.2014Nanoscience and nanotechnology research publications: A comparison between Australia and the rest of the world100112114810.1007/s11192-014-1287-6Search in Google Scholar
Guan, J.C., & Wei, H. (2015). A bilateral comparison of research performance at an institutional level. Scientometrics, 104(1), 147–173.GuanJ.C.WeiH.2015A bilateral comparison of research performance at an institutional level104114717310.1007/s11192-015-1599-1Search in Google Scholar
Heimeriks, G. (2013). Interdisciplinarity in biotechnology, genomics and nanotechnology. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), 97–112.HeimeriksG.2013Interdisciplinarity in biotechnology, genomics and nanotechnology4019711210.1093/scipol/scs070Search in Google Scholar
Herranz, N., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2012). Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 543–556.HerranzN.Ruiz-CastilloJ.2012Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators6454355610.1016/j.joi.2012.02.006Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, J.C., Luczkovich, J.J., Borgatti, S.P., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2009). Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecological Modelling, 220(22), 3133–3140.JohnsonJ.C.LuczkovichJ.J.BorgattiS.P.SnijdersT.A.B.2009Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay220223133314010.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.037Search in Google Scholar
Jung, H.J., & Lee, J. (2014). The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the US National Nanotechnology Initiative. Research Policy, 43(1), 74–91.JungH.J.LeeJ.2014The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the US National Nanotechnology Initiative431749110.1016/j.respol.2013.07.001Search in Google Scholar
Kostoff, R.N., Barth, R.B., & Lau, C.G.Y. (2008). Relation of seminal nanotechnology document production to total nanotechnology document production—South Korea. Scientometrics, 76(1), 43–67.KostoffR.N.BarthR.B.LauC.G.Y.2008Relation of seminal nanotechnology document production to total nanotechnology document production—South Korea761436710.1007/s11192-007-1891-9Search in Google Scholar
Kostoff, R.N., Koytcheff, R.G., & Lau, C.G.Y. (2007). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601.KostoffR.N.KoytcheffR.G.LauC.G.Y.2007Global nanotechnology research metrics70356560110.1007/s11192-007-0303-5Search in Google Scholar
Krug, H.F., & Wick, P. (2011). Nanotoxicology: An interdisciplinary challenge. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, 50(6), 1260–1278.KrugH.F.WickP.2011Nanotoxicology: An interdisciplinary challenge5061260127810.1002/anie.20100103721290492Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85.LeydesdorffL.2008On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard index591778510.1002/asi.20732Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2013). An evaluation of impacts in “nanoscience & nanotechnology”: Steps towards standards for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 94(1), 35–55.LeydesdorffL.2013An evaluation of impacts in “nanoscience & nanotechnology”: Steps towards standards for citation analysis941355510.1007/s11192-012-0750-5353536023293403Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.LeydesdorffL.CarleyS.RafolsI.2013Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories94258959310.1007/s11192-012-0784-8354724423335826Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23–36.LeydesdorffL.WagnerC.2009Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system781233610.1007/s11192-008-1830-4Search in Google Scholar
Lin, C.S.L., & Ho, Y.S. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of publications on pluripotent stem cell research. Cell Journal, 17(1), 59–70.LinC.S.L.HoY.S.2015A bibliometric analysis of publications on pluripotent stem cell research1715970Search in Google Scholar
Lindquist, N.C. (2014). Interdisciplinary chemistry and physics research and advanced nanotechnology labs. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 247.LindquistN.C.2014Interdisciplinary chemistry and physics research and advanced nanotechnology labs247Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Y., Williams, C.C., & Wickramasinghe, H.K.(1987). Atomic force microscope foce mapping and profiling on a sub 100-A scale. Journal of Applied Physics, 61(10), 4723–4729.MartinY.WilliamsC.C.WickramasingheH.K.1987Atomic force microscope foce mapping and profiling on a sub 100-A scale61104723472910.1063/1.338807Search in Google Scholar
Milanez, D.H., do Amaral, R.M., Faria, L.I.L. de, & Gregolin, J.A.R. (2013). Assessing nanocellulose developments using science and technology indicators. Materials Research-Ibero-American Journal of Materials, 16(3), 635–641.MilanezD.H.do AmaralR.M.FariaL.I.L. deGregolinJ.A.R.2013Assessing nanocellulose developments using science and technology indicators16363564110.1590/S1516-14392013005000033Search in Google Scholar
Mody, C.C.M., & Choi, H. (2013). From materials science to nanotechnology: Interdisciplinary center programs at Cornell University, 1960–2000. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 43(2), 121–161.ModyC.C.M.ChoiH.2013From materials science to nanotechnology: Interdisciplinary center programs at Cornell University, 1960–200043212116110.1525/hsns.2013.43.2.121Search in Google Scholar
Mohammadi, E. (2012). Knowledge mapping of the Iranian nanoscience and technology: A text mining approach. Scientometrics, 92(3), 593–608.MohammadiE.2012Knowledge mapping of the Iranian nanoscience and technology: A text mining approach92359360810.1007/s11192-012-0644-6Search in Google Scholar
National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy (COSEPUP). (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy (COSEPUP)2005Washington, D.C.National Academies PressSearch in Google Scholar
Patenaude, J., Legault, G.A., Beauvais, J., Bernier, L., Beland, J.P., Boissy, P., Chenel, V., Daniel, C.E., Genest, J., Poirier, M.S., & Tapin, D. (2015). Framework for the analysis of nanotechnologies’ impacts and ethical acceptability: Basis of an interdisciplinary approach to assessing novel technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(2), 293–315.PatenaudeJ.LegaultG.A.BeauvaisJ.BernierL.BelandJ.P.BoissyP.ChenelV.DanielC.E.GenestJ.PoirierM.S.TapinD.2015Framework for the analysis of nanotechnologies’ impacts and ethical acceptability: Basis of an interdisciplinary approach to assessing novel technologies21229331510.1007/s11948-014-9543-y437181724728612Search in Google Scholar
Persson, O., & Dastidar, P.G. (2013). Citation analysis to reconstruct the dynamics of Antarctic ozone hole research and formulation of the Montreal Protocol. Current Science, 104(7), 835–840.PerssonO.DastidarP.G.2013Citation analysis to reconstruct the dynamics of Antarctic ozone hole research and formulation of the Montreal Protocol1047835840Search in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023–1041.PorterA.L.YoutieJ.2009How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology?1151023104110.1007/s11051-009-9607-0298820721170124Search in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D.J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728.PorterA.L.YoutieJ.ShapiraP.SchoeneckD.J.2008Refining search terms for nanotechnology10571572810.1007/s11051-007-9266-ySearch in Google Scholar
Roco, M.C. (2001). From vision to the implementation of the US National Nanotechnology Initiative. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3(1), 5–11.RocoM.C.2001From vision to the implementation of the US National Nanotechnology Initiative3151110.1023/A:1011429917892Search in Google Scholar
Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465.SchummerJ.2004Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology59342546510.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38Search in Google Scholar
Souminen, A., Li, Y., & Youtie, J. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of the development of next generation active nanotechnologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(9), 270.SouminenA.LiY.YoutieJ.2016A bibliometric analysis of the development of next generation active nanotechnologies18927010.1007/s11051-016-3578-8Search in Google Scholar
Sweileh, W.M., Al-Jabi, S.W., Sawalha, A.F., & Zyoud, S.H. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of nutrition and dietetics research activity in Arab countries using ISI Web of Science database. Springerplus, 3(1), 718.SweilehW.M.Al-JabiS.W.SawalhaA.F.ZyoudS.H.2014Bibliometric analysis of nutrition and dietetics research activity in Arab countries using ISI Web of Science database3171810.1186/2193-1801-3-718432016725674458Search in Google Scholar
Tersoff, J., & Hamann, D.R. (1983). Theory and application for the scanning tunneling microscope. Physical Review Letters, 50(25), 1998–2001.TersoffJ.HamannD.R.1983Theory and application for the scanning tunneling microscope50251998200110.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1998Search in Google Scholar
Tersoff, J., & Hamann, D.R. (1985). Theory of the scanning tunneling microscope. Physical Review B, 31(2), 805–813.TersoffJ.HamannD.R.1985Theory of the scanning tunneling microscope31280581310.1103/PhysRevB.31.805Search in Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563–586.WangJ.ShapiraP.2011Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: The case of nanotechnology87356358610.1007/s11192-011-0362-5Search in Google Scholar
Wong, P.K., Ho, Y.P., & Chan, C.K. (2007). Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 70(3), 715–737.WongP.K.HoY.P.ChanC.K.2007Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology70371573710.1007/s11192-007-0309-zSearch in Google Scholar