Sperm DNA Integrity Test and Assisted Reproductive Technology (Art) Outcome

1. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, Lansac J, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:811-6.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137433Search in Google Scholar

2. Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI. Male infertility: recent advances and a Iook toward the future. Out Opin Urol. 2000; 10:359-62.10.1097/00042307-200007000-00011Search in Google Scholar

3. Oehninger S. Clinical and laboratory management of male infertility: an opinion on its current status. JAndrol. 2000;21:814-21.Search in Google Scholar

4. Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Verheyen G, Toumaye 11, Camus M, et al. The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1123-9.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136104Search in Google Scholar

5. Lopes S, Sun J, Jurisicova A, Meriano J, Casper RF. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor-quality semen samples and correlates with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:528-32.10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00536-0Search in Google Scholar

6. Edwards RG, Beard 1 IK. Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14:1-6.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ludwig M, Diedrich K. Possibilities and limits of assisted reproduction. Gesundheitswesen. 1999;61:593-600.Search in Google Scholar

8. Sakkas D, UmerF, Bianchi PG, Bizzaro D, Wagner I, Jaquenoud N, et al. Sperm chromatin abnormalities can influence decondensation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:837-43.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019263Search in Google Scholar

9. Irvine DS, Twigg JP, Gordan EL, Fulton N, Milne A, Aitken J. DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J Androl. 2000;21:33-44.Search in Google Scholar

10. Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, et al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1039-49.10.1093/humrep/14.4.1039Search in Google Scholar

11. Larson KL, DeJonge CJ, Barnes AM, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Relationship of assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcomes with sperm chromatin integrity and maturity as measures by the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA). Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1717-22.10.1093/humrep/15.8.1717Search in Google Scholar

12. Morris ID, Ilott S, Dixon L, Brison DR. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell electrophoresis (COMETassay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17:990-8.10.1093/humrep/17.4.990Search in Google Scholar

13. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR, Nada EA, El-Tonsy MH, Alvarez G, et al. Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normozoospermic infertile men: a prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:313-8.10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03219-3Search in Google Scholar

14. Spano M, Bonde JP, Hjollund HI, Kolstad HA, Cordelli E, Leter G. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:43-50.Search in Google Scholar

15. Zini A, Bielecki R, Phang D, Zenzes MT. Correlations between two markers of DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:674-7.10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01796-9Search in Google Scholar

16. Tomlinson MJ, MoffattO, Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, AfnanM, Sakkas D. Interrelationshipsbetween seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16:2160-5.10.1093/humrep/16.10.2160Search in Google Scholar

17. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

18. Sakkas D, Mariethoz, Manicardi G, Bizzaro D,Bianchi U. Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Rev Reprod. 1999;4:31 -710.1530/ror.0.0040031Search in Google Scholar

19. Zini A,Garrels K, Phang D. Anti oxidant activity in the semen of fertile and infertile men. Urology. 2000;55:922-6.10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00453-2Search in Google Scholar

20. Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, Allamaneni SS. Relationship between oxidative stress, varicocele and infertility: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006; 12:630-3.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61190-XSearch in Google Scholar

21. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nada EA, El-Tonsy MH, Sharma RK, Meyer A, et al. Negative effects of increased sperm DNA damage in relation to seminal oxidative stress in men with idiopathic and male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1597-605.10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00337-6Search in Google Scholar

22. Janny L, Menezo YJ. Evidence for a strong paternal effect on human preimplantation embryo development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;38(1 ):36-42.10.1002/mrd.10803801078049063Search in Google Scholar

23.Sikka SC, Rajasekaran M, Hellstrom WJ. Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male infertility. JAndrol. 1995;16:464-8.Search in Google Scholar

24. Evenson DR Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA*): 30 years of experience with the SCSA®. In: Zini A, Agarwal A, editors. Sperm chromatin: Biological and clinical applications in male infertility and assisted reproduction. New York: Springer;2011.p. 125-49.10.1007/978-1-4419-6857-9_9Search in Google Scholar

25. Zinaman MJ, Brown CC, Selevan SG, Clegg ED. Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples, J Androl. 2000;21(1): 145-53.Search in Google Scholar

26. Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, Erenpreiss J, et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2007;22(1): 174-9. Available from: http://humrep.oxfordjoumals.Org/content/22/l/174.short-aff-l.10.1093/humrep/del32616921163Search in Google Scholar

27.Giwercman A, Lindstedt L, Larsson M, Bungum M, Spano M, Levine RJ, et al. Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study. Int J Androl. 2010;33( 1 ):e221 -7. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00995.x19840147Search in Google Scholar