<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Selection of an appropriate surgical method for hysterectomy in an individual patient is currently an issue that remains open and debatable. This study aimed to analyze perioperative outcomes in gynecologic patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy at a single institution during a 6-year period and to compare the data for simple hysterectomy patients treated with different surgical approaches. The study included a retrospective analysis of demographics, pre- and post-operative characteristics of 1,023 patients, operated on using four types of simple hysterectomy approaches: 635 laparoscopic hysterectomies (62.1%), 289 total abdominal hysterectomies (28.3%), 45 total vaginal hysterectomies (4.4%) and 54 robotic-assisted hysterectomies (5.3%). For the laparoscopic hysterectomy group, the mean operative time was shorter as compared to the abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy groups (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05), as well as a significantly shorter hospital length-of-stay when compared to the abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomy groups (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05). Regression analysis revealed significant linear correlation between operative time and body-mass index of laparoscopic hysterectomy patients (R<sup>2</sup> =0.008; <italic>p</italic>=0.026). Complications emergence and hemotransfusion often prolonged the mean operative time significantly by 17.8 min (<italic>p=</italic>0.002) and 15.5 min, respectively (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). The rate of major complications was significantly higher in the laparoscopic vs. abdominal groups (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05). Clinical outcomes in patients operated on with laparoscopic hysterectomy were better than in those operated with total abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in terms of operative time and hospital length-of-stay. Prospective randomized multi-center studies would be desirable to further define the place of the modern minimally invasive hysterectomy approaches.</p></abstract>

Selection of an appropriate surgical method for hysterectomy in an individual patient is currently an issue that remains open and debatable. This study aimed to analyze perioperative outcomes in gynecologic patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy at a single institution during a 6-year period and to compare the data for simple hysterectomy patients treated with different surgical approaches. The study included a retrospective analysis of demographics, pre- and post-operative characteristics of 1,023 patients, operated on using four types of simple hysterectomy approaches: 635 laparoscopic hysterectomies (62.1%), 289 total abdominal hysterectomies (28.3%), 45 total vaginal hysterectomies (4.4%) and 54 robotic-assisted hysterectomies (5.3%). For the laparoscopic hysterectomy group, the mean operative time was shorter as compared to the abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy groups (p<0.05), as well as a significantly shorter hospital length-of-stay when compared to the abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomy groups (p<0.05). Regression analysis revealed significant linear correlation between operative time and body-mass index of laparoscopic hysterectomy patients (R2 =0.008; p=0.026). Complications emergence and hemotransfusion often prolonged the mean operative time significantly by 17.8 min (p=0.002) and 15.5 min, respectively (p<0.001). The rate of major complications was significantly higher in the laparoscopic vs. abdominal groups (p<0.05). Clinical outcomes in patients operated on with laparoscopic hysterectomy were better than in those operated with total abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in terms of operative time and hospital length-of-stay. Prospective randomized multi-center studies would be desirable to further define the place of the modern minimally invasive hysterectomy approaches.

Perioperative Outcomes Of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Comparison With Abdominal, Vaginal, And Robot-Assisted Surgical Approaches

Gynecologic Oncology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Medical University – Pleven

Department of General and Clinical Pathology, Medical University – Pleven, Bulgaria

Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Research

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Selection of an appropriate surgical method for hysterectomy in an individual patient is currently an issue that remains open and debatable. This study aimed...

Perioperative Outcomes Of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Comparison With Abdominal, Vaginal, And Robot-Assisted Surgical Approaches

Data publikacji: 10 gru 2015

Zakres stron: 52 - 60

Otrzymano: 23 mar 2015

Przyjęty: 18 maj 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcr-2015-0152

Słowa kluczowe
laparoscopic hysterectomy, peri-operartive outcome, comparative analysis surgical approaches

© 2015 Slavcho T. Tomov et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Perioperative Outcomes Of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Comparison With Abdominal, Vaginal, And Robot-Assisted Surgical Approaches

Data publikacji: 10 gru 2015

Zakres stron: 52 - 60

Otrzymano: 23 mar 2015

Przyjęty: 18 maj 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcr-2015-0152

Słowa kluczowelaparoscopic hysterectomy, peri-operartive outcome, comparative analysis surgical approaches

© 2015 Slavcho T. Tomov et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
laparoscopic hysterectomy, peri-operartive outcome, comparative analysis surgical approaches