An English Neural Network that Learns Texts, Finds Hidden Knowledge, and Answers Questions

[1] E. Brill, A simple rule-based part of speech tagger, In Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, HLT’91, pp. 112-116, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 199210.3115/1075527.1075553Search in Google Scholar

[2] C. D. Manning and H. Sch¨utze, Foundations of statistical natural language processing, MIT press, 1999Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3-55, 200110.1145/584091.584093Search in Google Scholar

[4] N. Chomsky, Three models for the description of language, Information Theory, IRE Transactions on, vol. 2, no. 3, pp.113-124, 195610.1109/TIT.1956.1056813Search in Google Scholar

[5] W. A. Gale, K. W. Church, and D. Yarowsky, Work on statistical methods for word sense disambiguation, In Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, vol. 54, p. 60. 1992Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Kupiec, Robust part-of-speech tagging using a hidden markov model, Computer Speech & Language, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 225 - 242, 199210.1016/0885-2308(92)90019-ZSearch in Google Scholar

[7] H. Schmid, Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees, in Proceedings of the international conference on new methods in language processing, vol. 12, pp. 44-49. Citeseer, 1994Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Ratnaparkhi et al, A maximum entropy model for part-of-speech tagging, in Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, vol. 1, pp. 133-142. Philadelphia, USA, 1996Search in Google Scholar

[9] P. F. Brown, V. J. D. Pietra, S. A. D. Pietra, and R. L. Mercer, The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation, Computational linguistics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 263-311, 1993Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. Hotta, M. Kittaka, and M. Hagiwara,Word vectorization using relations among words for neural network, IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, vol. 130, pp. 75-82, 201010.1541/ieejeiss.130.75Search in Google Scholar

[11] G. Tsatsaronis, I. Varlamis, and M. Vazirgiannis, Text relatedness based on a word thesaurus, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1-40, 201010.1613/jair.2880Search in Google Scholar

[12] G. Tsatsaronis, I. Varlamis, and M. Vazirgiannis, Word sense disambiguation with semantic networks, In Text, Speech and Dialogue, pp. 219-226. Springer, 200810.1007/978-3-540-87391-4_29Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Collobert, J. Weston, L. Bottou, M. Karlen, K. Kavukcuoglu, and P. Kuksa, Natural language processing (almost) from scratch, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 2493-2537, 2011Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. Sagara and M. Hagiwara, Natural language neural network and its application to questionanswering system, Neurocomputing, vol. 142, pp. 201 - 208, 201410.1016/j.neucom.2014.04.048Search in Google Scholar

[15] L. Dong, F. Wei, M. Zhou, and K. Xu, Question answering over Freebase with multi-column convolutional neural networks, in Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 260-269. Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing, China, July 201510.3115/v1/P15-1026Search in Google Scholar

[16] D. Bahdanau, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate, CoRR, vol. abs/1409.0473, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. E. Hummel and K. J. Holyoak, Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping, Psychological Review, vol. 104, no. 3, p. 427, 199710.1037/0033-295X.104.3.427Search in Google Scholar

[18] J. E. Hummel and K. J. Holyoak, A symbolicconnectionist theory of relational inference and generalization, Psychological review, vol. 110, no. 2, p. 220, 200310.1037/0033-295X.110.2.220Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. E. Hummel and K. J. Holyoak, Relational reasoning in a neurally plausible cognitive architecture an overview of the LISA project, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 153-157, 200510.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00350.xSearch in Google Scholar

[20] M. Saito and M. Hagiwara, Natural language processing neural network for analogical inference, In The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp.1-7, 201010.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596742Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. Kudo and H. Kazawa, Web Japanese N-gram version 1, Gengo Shigen Kyokai, vol. 14, 2007Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. Fukuda, S. Nobesawa, and I. Tahara, Knowledge representation for query-answer, In Forum on Information Technology, vol. 3, pp. 233-236, Information Processing Society of Japan, 2004Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. Ikehara, M. Miyazaki, S. Shirai, A. Yokoo, H. Nakaiwa, K. Ogura, Y. Ooyama, and Y. Hayashi, GoiTaikei-A Japanese Lexicon, Iwanami Shoten, 1997Search in Google Scholar

[24] T. Kudo, K. Yamamoto, and Y. Matsumoto, Applying conditional random fields to Japanese morphological analysis, in Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, vol. 2004, pp. 230-237. 2004Search in Google Scholar

[25] G. A. Miller, WordNet: a lexical database for english, Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 39-41, 199510.1145/219717.219748Search in Google Scholar

[26] G. Miller and C. Fellbaum, WordNet: An electronic lexical database, 199810.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. P. Marcus, M. A. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini, Building a large annotated corpus of english: The Penn Treebank, Comput. Linguist., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 313-330, June 199310.21236/ADA273556Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. Marcus, G. Kim, M. A. Marcinkiewicz, R. MacIntyre, A. Bies, M. Ferguson, K. Katz, and B. Schasberger, The Penn Treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology, HLT ’94, pp. 114-119, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 199410.3115/1075812.1075835Search in Google Scholar

[29] P. K. Martha and M. Palmer, From Treebank to Propbank, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 2002, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[30] P. Kingsbury, M. Palmer, and M. Marcus, Adding semantic annotation to the penn treebank, in Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, pp. 252-256, Citeseer, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. Palmer, D. Gildea, and P. Kingsbury, The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles, Comput. Linguist., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 71-106, March 200510.1162/0891201053630264Search in Google Scholar

[32] P. E.Woodford, The test of english for international communication (TOEIC), 1980Search in Google Scholar

[33] National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST TREC Document Database: Disk 4, Retrieved June 25, 2016, from http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd22.cfmSearch in Google Scholar

[34] National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST TREC Document Database: Disk 5, Retrieved June 25, 2016, from http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd23.cfmSearch in Google Scholar

[35] E. M. Voorhees et al. The TREC-8 question answering track report, in Proceedings of the 8th Text Retreval Conference, vol. 99, pp.77-82. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999Search in Google Scholar

[36] L. Loungheed, Longman preparation series for the new TOEIC test: More practice tests, 2006Search in Google Scholar

[37] T. S. Committee et al., TOEIC program data & analysis, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[38] E. T. Service, Examinee handbook listening & reading, 2008Search in Google Scholar