1. bookTom 43 (2014): Zeszyt 1 (September 2014)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2543-5361
Pierwsze wydanie
17 Oct 2014
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

CSR and Financial Performance: The Case of Polish Small and Medium Manufacturers

Data publikacji: 27 Jan 2015
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 43 (2014) - Zeszyt 1 (September 2014)
Zakres stron: 53 - 73
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2543-5361
Pierwsze wydanie
17 Oct 2014
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., Hatfield, J. (1985), An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 28, pp. 446-463.Search in Google Scholar

Barnett, M., Salomon, R. (2006), Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp. 1101-1122.Search in Google Scholar

Bello, Z. (2005), Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification, Journal of Financial Research, 28, pp. 4-57.Search in Google Scholar

Bowen, N., Guo, S. (2012), Structural Equation Modeling: Pocket Guides to Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367621.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Brammer, S. and Pavalin, S. (2006), Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit, Journal of Management Studies, 43, pp. 435-55.Search in Google Scholar

Bush, T., Hoffmann, V. (2011), How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance, Business and Society, 50, pp. 233-265.Search in Google Scholar

Byrne, B. (2010), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, Second Edition, Routledge, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., Waldman, D.A. (2007), The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance, Journal of Management Studies, 44, pp. 972-92.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, A.B. (1979), A three‑dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Academy of Management Review, 4(1), pp. 497-505.Search in Google Scholar

Dahlsrud, A. (2008), How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15 (1), pp. 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2011), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2003), Responsible entrepreneurship: A collection of good practice cases among small and medium sized enterprises across Europe, Belgium, Bruxelles. retrieved on September 27, 2014 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2005), Awareness‑raising questionnaire, Belgium, Bruxelles, retrieved on June 3, 2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr/campaign/documentation/download/questionaire_pl.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gadenne, D., Kennedy, J., McKeiver, C. (2008), An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs, Journal of Business Ethics, 10, pp. 1-19.Search in Google Scholar

Garson, D. (2012), Structural Equation Modeling: Statistical Association Publishing Blue Book Series, Statistical Association Publishing, Asheboro.Search in Google Scholar

Groza, M.D., Pronschinske, M.R., Walker, M. (2011), Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR, Journal of Business Ethics, 102, pp. 639-652.Search in Google Scholar

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. (2010), Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.), Prentice‑Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Hoyle, R.H. (2011), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, H. (2009), A business opportunity model of corporate social responsibility for small- and medium‑sized enterprises, Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), pp. 21-36.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, W., Chau, K., Wang, H., Pan, W. (2014), A decade’s debate on the nexus between corporate social and financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002-2011, Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, pp. 195-206.Search in Google Scholar

Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006), Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value, Journal of Marketing, 70, pp. 1-18.Search in Google Scholar

Malhotra, N. (2010), Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Prentice Hall, 6th edition.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, K., Thaghafian, H., Esapour, K., Amin, Alvari, M., Farhoodi, A. (2011), A study of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), pp. 668-674.Search in Google Scholar

Matten, D., Moon, J. (2008), Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 33(2), pp. 404-424.Search in Google Scholar

McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Wright, P. (2006), Guest editors’ introduction. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications, Journal of Management Studies, 43, pp. 1-18.Search in Google Scholar

Mirońska, D., Zaborek, P. (2014), Polacy wobec marketingu społecznie zaangażowanego, Marketing i Rynek, 1/2014.Search in Google Scholar

Mulaik, S. (2009), Linear Causal Modeling with Structural Equations, Chapman & Hall, CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton.10.1201/9781439800393Search in Google Scholar

Peloza, J. (2006), Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance, California Management Review, 48, pp. 52-72.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, R., Mullen, M. (2009), Some Evidence of the Cumulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance, The Journal of Global Business Issues, 3(1), pp. 1-14.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2006). ‘Strategy and society’. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-91.Search in Google Scholar

Rettab, B., Ben Brik, A., Mellahi, K. (2009), A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance in emerging economies: the case of Dubai, Journal of Business Ethics, 89, pp. 371-390. Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Z., Eirikur, H., Rotenberg, S. (2012), How Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Strategy Moderates the CSR - Financial Performance Relationship, Journal of Management Studies, 49, pp.1274-1303.Search in Google Scholar

The Economist (2014), The glass‑ceiling index: The best and worst places to be a working women, March 6th.Search in Google Scholar

Torgusa, N., O’Donohue, W., Hecker, R. (2012), Capabilities, Proactive CSR and Financial Performance in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from an Australian Manufacturing Industry Sector, Journal of Business Ethics, 109, pp. 483-500.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, M. (2009), Innovation and competitive advantages: from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms, Business, Strategy and the Environment, 18, pp. 291-306.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., Whermeyer, W. (2002), The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis of the European paper industry, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, pp. 133-146.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, V., Ting, H., Wu, Y. (2009), Assessing the greenness effort for European firms: A resource efficiency perspective, Management Decisions, 47, pp. 1065-1079.Search in Google Scholar

Zaborek, P., Mirońska, D. (2013), Analiza wrażliwości polskich nabywcow dobr indywidualnych na działania z zakresu marketingu społecznego podejmowane przez wytworcow dobr i usług konsumpcyjnych, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 288, pp. 115-125. Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo