Online streaming public participation in forest management planning

Black, J. 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. – Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164.Search in Google Scholar

Buijs, A., Lawrence, A. 2013. Emotional conflicts in rational forestry: Towards a research agenda for understanding emotions in environmental conflicts. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 104–111.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Eastaugh, C.S., Kangur, A., Korjus, H., Kiviste, A., Zlatanov, T., Velichkov, I., Srdjevic, B., Srdjevic, Z., Hasenauer, H. 2013. Scaling issues and constraints in modelling of forest ecosystems: a review with special focus on user needs. – Baltic Forestry, 19(2), 316–330.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, P., Kleinschmit, D. 2013. Towards a European forest policy – conflicting courses. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 87–93.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gadow, K. v. 2000. Evaluating risk in forest planning models. – Silva Fennica, 34(2), 181–191.Search in Google Scholar

Hellström, E. 2001. Conflict cultures – qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in forestry. – Silva Fennica Monographs, 2, 109 pp.10.14214/sf.sfm2Search in Google Scholar

Holmgren, P., Thuresson, T. 1997. Applying objectively estimated and spatially continuous forest parameters in tactical planning to obtain dynamic treatment units. – Forest Science, 43(3), 317−326.Search in Google Scholar

Hynynen, J., Ojansuu, R., Hökkä, H., Siipilehto, J., Salminen, H., Haapala, P. 2002. Models for predicting stand development in MELA system. – Metsäntut-kimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 835, 116 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Karppinen, H. 1998. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. – Silva Fennica, 32, 43–59.Search in Google Scholar

Khadka, C., Hujala, T., Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H. 2013. Problem structuring in participatory forest planning. – Forest Policy and Economics, 26, 1−11.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kimmins, J.P. 1987. Forest ecology: models and the role in ecology and resource management. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 460-474.Search in Google Scholar

Kiviste, A., Hordo, M., Kangur, A., Kardakov, A., Laarmann, D., Lilleleht, A., Metslaid, S., Sims, A., Korjus, H. 2015. Monitoring and modeling of forest ecosystems: the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots. – Forestry studies / Metsanduslikud uurimused, 62, 26−38.Search in Google Scholar

Krott, M. 2005. Forest policy analysis. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 323 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Lindkvist, A., Mineur, E., Nordlund, A., Nordlund, C., Olsson, O., Sandström, C., Westin, K., Keskitalo, E.C.H. 2012. Attitudes on intensive forestry. An investigation into perceptions of increased production requirements in Swedish forestry. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(5), 438–448.10.1080/02827581.2011.645867Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nordström, E.-M., Eriksson, L.O., Öhman, K. 2010. Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden. – Forest Policy and Economics, 12(8), 562–574.Search in Google Scholar

Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H., Paluots, T. 2014. Management motives of Estonian private forest owners. – Forest Policy and Economics, 42, 8−14.10.1016/j.forpol.2014.02.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Raitio, K. 2012. New institutional approach to collaborative forest planning on public land: Methods for analysis and lessons for policy. – Land Use Policy, 29(2), 309–316.10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Raitio, K. 2013. Discursive institutionalist approach to conflict management analysis – The case of oldgrowth forest conflicts on state-owned land in Finland. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 97–103.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schröter, M., Rusch, G.M., Barton, D.N., Blumentrath, S., Nordén, B. 2014. Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity. – PLOS ONE, 9(11), e112557.Search in Google Scholar

Sims, A., Hordo, M., Kangur, A., Kiviste, K., Jõgiste, K., von Gadow, K. 2009. Tracking disturbances induced changes in stand development on irregular measurement intervals in the Järvselja forest experiments. – Baltic Forestry, 15(2), 151−160Search in Google Scholar

Sténs, A., Sandström, C. 2013. Divergent interests and ideas around property rights: The case of berry harvesting in Sweden. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 56–62.Search in Google Scholar

Transparency International 2017. Open governance. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.transparency.org.uk/our-work/uk-corruption/open-governance/ [Accessed 28 April 2017].Search in Google Scholar

United Nations. 1992. Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management. United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs, Geneva.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfslehner, B., Seidl, R. 2010. Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management. – Environmental Management, 46(6), 850–861.10.1007/s00267-009-9414-520024654Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zachrisson, A., Beland Lindahl, K. 2013. Conflict resolution through collaboration: Preconditions and limitations in forest and nature conservation controversies. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 39–46.Search in Google Scholar