[Anderson, M.C. 1964. Studies of the woodland light climate. I. The photographic computation of light condition. – Journal of Ecology, 52, 27–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arumäe, T., Lang, M. 2013. A simple model to estimate forest canopy base height from airborne lidar data. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 58, 46–56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Béland, M., Baldocchi, D.D., Widlowski, J.L., Fournier, R., Verstraete, M.M. 2014. On seeing the wood from the leaves and the role of voxel size in determining leaf area distribution of forests with terrestrial LiDAR. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 184, 82–97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bréda, N.J.J. 2003. Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. – Journal of Experimental Botany, 54(392), 2403–2417.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cescatti, A. 2007. Indirect estimates of canopy gap fraction based on the linear conversion of hemispherical photographs Methodology and comparison with standard thresholding techniques. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 143, 1–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, J.M., Rich, P.M., Gower, T.S., Norman, J.M., Plummer, S. 1997. Leaf area index of boreal forests: Theory, techniques and measurements. – Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 29429–29444.]Search in Google Scholar
[Danson, F.M., Morsdorf, F., Koetz, B. 2009. Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning for measuring vegetation canopy structure. – Heritage, G.L., Large, A.R.G. (eds.). Laser scanning for the environmental sciences. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 201–219.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frazer, G.W., Canham, C.D., Lertzman, K.P. 1999. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gower, S.T., Kucharik, C.J., Norman, J.M. 1999. Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 70, 29–51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Isenburg, M. 2007. LasTools – efficient tools for LiDAR processing. Version 150202. [WWW document]. – URL http://lastools.org [Accessed 14 April 2015].]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonckheere, I., Fleck, S., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., Coppin, P., Weiss, M., Baret, F. 2004. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination. Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 121, 19–35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones H.G. 1992. Plants and microclimate. A quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 413 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kangur, A., Korjus, H., Jõgiste, K., Kiviste, A. 2005. A conceptual model of forest stand development based on permanent sample-plot data in Estonia. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 20(6), 94–101.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kärkkäinen, L. 2005. Evaluation of performance of tree-level biomass models for forestry modelling and analyses. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research papers, 940. 123 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiviste, A., Hordo, M. 2002. Network of permanent forest growth plots in Estonia. Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 37, 43–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiviste, A., Hordo, M., Kangur, A., Kardakov, A., Laarmann, D., Lilleleht, A., Metslaid, S., Sims, A., Korjus, H. 2015. Monitoring and modeling of forest ecosystems: the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 62, 26–38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kodar, A., Lang, M., Arumäe, T., Eenmäe, A., Pisek, J., Nilson, T. 2011. Leaf area index mapping with airborne lidar, satellite images and ground measurements in Järvselja VALERI test site. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 55, 11–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korf, V. 1939. A mathematical definition of forest stands volume growth law. [Příspěvek k matematické definici vzrůstového zákona hmot lesních porostů.]. Lesnická práce, 18, 339–379. (In Czeckian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Korhonen, L., Korpela, I., Heiskanen, J., Maltamo, M. 2011. Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 1065–1080.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuusk, A., Lang, M., Kodar, A., Sims, A. 2015. Estimation of leaf area index of hemiboreal forests. – The Open Remote Sensing Journal, 6, 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lang, M. 2010. Estimation of crown and canopy cover from airborne lidar data. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 52, 5–17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lang, M., Arumäe, T., Anniste, J. 2012. Estimation of main forest inventory variables from spectral and airborne lidar data in Aegviidu test site, Estonia. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 56, 27–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lang, M., Kodar, A., Arumäe, T. 2013. Restoration of above canopy reference hemispherical image from below canopy measurements for plant area index estimation in forests. Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 59, 13–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lang, M., Kuusk, A., Mõttus, M., Rautiainen, M., Nilson, T. 2010. Canopy gap fraction estimation from digital hemispherical images using sky radiance models and a linear conversion method. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150, 20–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lang, M., Nilson, T., Kuusk, A., Kiviste, A., Hordo, M. 2007. The performance of foliage mass and crown radius models in forming the input of a forest reflectance model: A test on forest growth sample plots and Landsat 7 ETM+ images. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 110, 445–457.10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Leclerc, M.Y., Thurtell, G.W. 1990. Footprint predictions of scalar fluxes using a Markovian analysis. – Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 52, 247–258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lefsky, M.A., Cohen, W.B., Acker, S.A., Parker, G.G., Spies, T.A., Harding, D. 1999. Lidar remote sensing of the canopy structure and biophysical properties of Douglas-fir western hemlock forests. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 70, 339–361.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lefsky, M.A., Cohen, W.B., Parker, G.G., Harding, D.J. 2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. – Bioscience, 52, 19–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liang, S. 2004. Quantitative remote sensing of land surfaces. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/047172372X]Search in Google Scholar
[Macfarlane, C. 2011. Classification method of mixed pixels does not affect canopy metrics from digital images of forest overstorey. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151, 833–840.]Search in Google Scholar
[Majasalmi, T., Rautiainen, M., Stenberg, P., Lukeš, P. 2013. An assessment of ground reference methods for estimating LAI of boreal forests. – Forest Ecology and Management, 292, 10–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marklund, L.G. 1988. Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Forest Survey. Report 45, 71 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[McGaughey, R.J. 2012. FUSION/LDV: Software for LIDAR Data Analysis and Visualization. October 2013 – FUSION Version 3.40. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, J.B. 1967. A formula for average foliage density. – Australian Journal of Botany, 15, 141–144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morsdorf, F., Kötz, B., Meier, E., Itten, K.I., Allgöwer, B. 2006. Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 104, 50–61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Myneni, R.B., Keeling, C.D., Tucker, C.J., Asrar, G., Nemani, R.R. 1997. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. – Letters to Nature; Nature, 386, 698–702.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikinmaa, E., Bäck, J. 2008. Individual. – Boreal forest and climate change. Hari, P., Kulmala, L. (eds.). Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 117–118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nilson, T. 1999. Inversion of gap frequency data in forest stands. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 98–99, 437–448.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noe, S.M. 2013. Simple footprint model for SMEAR Estonia. Department of Plant Physiology. Estonian University of Life Sciences. 6p. Version 27.04.2013, unpublished.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noe, S.M., Kimmel, V., Hüve, K., Copolovici, L., Portillo-Estrada, M., Püttsepp, Ü., Jõgiste, K., Niinemets, Ü., Hörtnagl, L., Wohlfahrt, G. 2011. Ecosystem-scale biosphere–atmosphere interactions of a hemiboreal mixed forest stand at Järvselja, Estonia. – Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 71–81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peduzzi, A., Wynne, R.H., Fox, T.R., Nelson, R.F., Thomas, V.A. 2012. Estimating leaf area index in intensively managed pine plantations using airborne laser scanner data. – Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 54–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pope, G., Treitz, P. 2013. Leaf area index (LAI) estimation in boreal mixedwood forest of Ontario, Canada using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and WorldView-2 imagery. – Remote Sensing, 5, 5040–5063.10.3390/rs5105040]Search in Google Scholar
[R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rautiainen, M., Nilson, T., and Lükk, T. 2009. Seasonal reflectance trends of hemiboreal birch forests. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 805-815.]Search in Google Scholar
[Repola, J. 2008. Biomass equations for birch in Finland. – Silva Fennica, 42, 605–624.]Search in Google Scholar
[Repola, J. 2009. Biomass equations for Scots pine and Norway spruce in Finland. – Silva Fennica, 43, 625–647.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rich, P.M. 1990. Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. – Remote Sensing Reviews, 5, 13–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, J.J., Moskal, L.M., Kim, S.H. 2009. Modeling approaches to estimate effective leaf area index from aerial discrete-return LIDAR. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149, 1152–1160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ross J. 1981. The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. The Hague, Dr W. Junk Publishers. 420 pp.10.1007/978-94-009-8647-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering, D.W. 1973. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. – Third ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351 I, 309–317.]Search in Google Scholar
[SMEAR Estonia. 2015. [WWW document]. URL – http://smear.emu.ee/ [Accessed 12 June 2015].]Search in Google Scholar
[Solberg, S., Brunner, A., Hanssen, K.H., Lange, H., Næsset, E., Rautiainen, M., Stenberg, P. 2009. Mapping LAI in a Norway spruce forest using airborne laser scanning. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 2317–2327.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stenberg, P. 1996. Correcting LAI-2000 estimates for the clumping of needles in shoots of conifers. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 79, 1–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stenberg, P., Rautiainen, M., Manninen, T., Voipo, P., Smolander, H. 2004. Reduced Simple Ratio better than NDVI for estimating LAI in Finnish pine and spruce stands. – Silva Fennica, 38, 3–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Straatsma, M.W., Middelkoop, H. 2006. Airborne laser scanning as a tool for lowland floodplain vegetation monitoring. – Hydrobiologia, 565, 87–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valentine, H.T., Mäkelä, A. 2005. Bridging process-based and empirical approaches to modeling tree growth. – Tree Physiology, 25, 769–779.]Search in Google Scholar
[Validation of Land European Remote sensing Instruments. 2015. [WWW document]. URL – http://w3.avignon.inra.fr/valeri/ [Accessed 12 June 2015].]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, S. 1998. Calibration of grey values of hemispherical photographs for image analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 90, 103–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, D.J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. – Annals of Botany, 11, 41–76.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083148]Search in Google Scholar
[Zianis, D., Muukkonen, P., Mäkipää, R., Mencuccini, M. 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monographs, 4, p. 63.]Search in Google Scholar
