Development of an accurate nursing program based on function in chronic venous leg ulcers: protocol for matching function status with nursing interventions using the Delphi survey
, , , , oraz
31 gru 2018
O artykule
Kategoria artykułu: Original article
Data publikacji: 31 gru 2018
Zakres stron: 265 - 272
Otrzymano: 24 lis 2017
Przyjęty: 25 kwi 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fon-2018-0036
Słowa kluczowe
© 2018 Yi-Fan Tang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Leg ulcer measurement tool_
Assessment | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1.Exudate type | None | Serosanguineous | Serous | Seropurulent | Purulent |
A2.Exudate amount | None | Scant | Small | Moderate | Copious |
A3.Size (length×width) | Healed | <2.5 cm | 2.5–5.0 cm | 5.1–10.0 cm | ≥10.1 cm |
A4.Depth | Healed | Partial thickness skin loss | Full thickness | Tendon/joint capsule visible | Probes to bone |
A5.Undermining (greatest at _o’clock) | 0 cm | >0–0.4 cm | >0.4–0.9 cm | >0.9–1.4 cm | >1.5 cm |
A6.Necrotic tissue type | None | Loose white to yellow slough | Attached white to yellow slough or fibrin | Soft grey to black eschar | Hard dry black eschar |
A7.Necrotic tissue amount | None visible | 1–25% of wound bed covered | 26–50% of wound bed covered | 51–75% of wound bed covered | 76–100% of wound bed covered |
A8.Granulation tissue type | Healed | Bright beefy red | Dusky pink | Pale | Absent |
A10.Edges | Healed | ≥50% advancing border of epithelium or indistinct borders | <50% advancing border of epithelium | Attached, no advancing border of epithelium | Unattached or undermined |
A11.Periulcer skin viability | None | One only | Two or three | Four or five | Six or more factors |
A12.Leg edema type | None | Nonpitting or firmness | Pitting | Fibrosis or lipodermatosclerosis | Indurated |
A13.Leg edema location | None | Localized periulcer | Foot, including ankle | To mid-calf | To knee |
A14.Assessment of bioburden | Healed | Lightly colonized | Heavily colonized | Localized infection | Systemic infection |
B1.Pain amount | None | >0–2 | >2–4 | >4–7 | >7 |
B2.Pain frequency | None | Occasional | Position dependent | Constant | Disturbs sleep |
B3.Quality of life | Delighted | Satisfied | Mixed | Dissatisfied | Terrible |
Peripheral arterial risk chart_
Low risk | Medium risk | High risk |
---|---|---|
All the factors below must be present Review annually | Ankle–brachial pressure index (ABIP) = 0.81–1.3 With accompanying score of 2 or more Review every 6 months | If any one risk factor below is present Review every 3 months |
ABIP 0.81–1.3 | Smoker | ABIP<0.81–1.3 |
Mobile | Age, 70+ | Diabetes |
Good cognitive ability | Cardiac disease | Immobile/limited mobility |
No complications | Cerebral vascular accident | Small vessel disease (i.e., diabetes) |
Patient has knowledge of early symptoms of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) | Transient ischemic attack Hypertension | Angioplasty/bypass (lower limbs) |
Patient has contact numbers if there are any concerns | Comorbidities (learning needs, cognitive impairment, drug/alcohol dependency, and mental illness) | Inflammatory conditions, i.e., rheumatoid arthritis Systematic lupus erythematous Intermittent claudication Unilateral amputee (PAD) |
Ankle–brachial pressure index (ABPI)_
ABPI | >1.3 | 0.90–1.30 | 0.81–0.89 | 0.51–0.8 | <0.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Abnormal vessel hardening | Normal | Abnormal | Significant ischemia | Severe ischemia |