[1. Boitshwarelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161-179.10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.881]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bresler, L. (1993). The social organization of achievement: A case study of a music theory class. The Curriculum Journal, 4(1), 37-58.10.1080/0958517930040104]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 17-32. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.10.3102/0013189X018001032]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Burnard, P. (2007). Reframing creativity and technology: Promoting pedagogic change in music education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 1(1), 37-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.1.1.37_1]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Cape Town Open Education Declaration (2007). Read the Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declaration]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Carson, S. (2006). 2005 Program evaluation findings report. MIT OpenCourseWare. Retrieved from https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/05_Prog_Eval_Report_Final.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Carson, S. (2009). 2009 Program Evaluation Findings Summary. MIT OpenCourseWare. Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Crawford, R. (2014). A multidimensional/non-linear teaching and learning model: Teaching and learning music in an authentic and holistic context. Music Education Research, 16(1), 50-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.81262710.1080/14613808.2013.812627]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Fletcher, G., Schaffhauser, D, & Levin, D. (2012). Out of Print: Reimagining the K-12 Textbook in a Digital Age. Washington, DC: State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA).]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Godin, S. (2012). Stop stealing dreams: (What is school for?). Retrieved from http://www.squidoo.com/seth#module157797563]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Green, L. (2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. Farnham, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hargreaves, D. J., & Marshall, N. A. (2003). Developing identities in music education. Music Education Research, 5(3), 263-274.10.1080/1461380032000126355]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Harley, D. (2008). Why understanding the use and users of open education matters. In J. S. Brown, T. Iiyoshi, & M. S. V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. 197-211). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2006). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (Concise paperback ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Knowles, M., & Associates. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings: Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-9310.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Lee, S. D. (2008). The gates are shut: Technical and cultural barriers to open education. In T. Iiyoshi & M.S.V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality (M. J. Hall, Trans.). Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Lilliestam, L. (1996). On Playing by Ear. Popular Music, 15(2), 195-216.10.1017/S0261143000008114]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Lysloff, R. T. A. (2003). Musical community on the Internet: An on-line ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 18(2), 233-263.10.1525/can.2003.18.2.233]Search in Google Scholar
[23. McAndrew, P., dos Santos, A. I., Lane, A., Godwin, S., Okada, A., Wilson, T., Connolly, T., Ferreira, G., Buckingham Shum, S., Bretts, J., & Webb, R. (2008). OpenLearn: Research Report 2006-2008. Milton Keynes: OpenLearn, The Open University. Retrieved from http://www3.open.ac.uk/events/6/2009727_62936_o1.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer-interaction. In Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 7-16). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Nettl, B. (1985). The Western impact on world music: Change, adaptation, and survival. New York, NY: Schirmer Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Peters, J. M., Taylor, J. E., & Doi, M. M. (2009). Self-directed learning and action research. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 6(2), 23-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Action Research (concise paperback ed.) London: Sage Publications Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2013). Podcasting for language learning through iTunes U: The learner’s view. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 74-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2012). An open education resource supports a diversity of inquiry-based learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 1-16.10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1141]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2016a). An online participatory action research inquiry into online inquiry-based music learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/90449]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2016b). Barriers to self-motivated conceptual music learning: Activity theory as a framework for comparing dissimilar cases. Music Education Research, 16(2), doi: 10.1080/14613808.2016.1249362]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman. Eds. A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Waldron, J. (2009). Exploring a virtual music ‘community of practice’: Informal music learning on the Internet. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 2(2-3), 97-112. doi: 10.1386/jmte.2.2-3.97_1]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Welch, G. F. (2007). Addressing the multifaceted nature of music education: An activity theory research perspective. Research Studies in Music Education, 28, 23-37. 10.1177/1321103X070280010203]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Wells, G. (2001). Action, Talk, and Text: Learning and Teaching through Inquiry. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Woody, R. H., & Lehmann, A. C. (2010). Student Musicians’ Ear-Playing Ability as a Function of Vernacular Music Experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(2), 101-115. doi: 10.1177/0022429410370785]Search in Google Scholar