Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Public Procurement Process Optimization

Alarcon, L.F. & Mourgues, C. (2002). Performance modelling for contractor selection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18 (2), 52–60.Search in Google Scholar

Al-Harbi, K. M. & A.-S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19 (1), 19 –27.10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1Search in Google Scholar

Andruškevičius, A. (2005). Evaluation of contractors by using COPRAS – the multiple criteria method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 11(3), 158–169.10.3846/13928619.2005.9637694Search in Google Scholar

Azis, I.J. (2010). Predicting a Recovery Date from the Economic Crisis of 2008. Socio economic planning sciences, 44, 122-129.10.1016/j.seps.2010.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Banaitis, A. & Banaitien, N. (2006). Analysis of criteria for contractors’ qualification evaluation, Technological and Economic. Development of Economy, 12(4), 276–282.Search in Google Scholar

Blair, A.R., Mnadelker, G.N., Saaty, T.L. & Whitaker, R. (2010). Forecasting the resurgence of the U.S. economy in 2010: An expert judgment approach. Socio - Economic Planning Sciences, 44(3) 114-121.Search in Google Scholar

Carr, P. G. (2012). Investigation of Bid Price Competition Measured through Prebid Project Estimates, Actual Bid Prices, and Number of Bidders. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(11), 1165–1172.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1165)Search in Google Scholar

Dobi, K., Gugić, J., Kancijan, D. (2010). AHP As a Decision Support Tool in the Multicriteria Evaluation of Bids in Public Procurement Proceedings of the ITI 2010 32nd Int. Conf. on Information Technology Interfaces, June 21-24, Cavtat, Croatia.Search in Google Scholar

Fong, P. S. W.& Choi, S. K.-Y. (2000). Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process. Construction Management & Economics, 18(5), 547–557.10.1080/014461900407356Search in Google Scholar

Ginevicius, R. & Podvezko, V. (2008). Multicriteria graphical analytical evaluation of the financial state of construction enterprises. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(4), 452–461.10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.452-461Search in Google Scholar

Hatush, Z. & Skitmore, M. (1998). Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: An additive model. Building and Environment, 33(2-3), 105–115.10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00016-4Search in Google Scholar

Holt, G.D. (1997). Classifying construction contractors: a case study using cluster analysis. Building Research and Information, 25(6), 374–82.10.1080/096132197370200Search in Google Scholar

Holt, G.D. (1998). Which contractor selection methodology? International Journal of Project Management, 16(3), 153–164.10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00035-5Search in Google Scholar

Holt, G. D. & Edwards, D. J. (2005). Domestic builder selection in the UK housing repair and maintenance sector: a critique. Journal of Construction Research, 6(1), 123–137.10.1142/S1609945105000298Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, M. (2005). Evaluation of the Local Government Procurement Agenda – Baseline Survey Report. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London. [On-line]. Available at www.odpm.gov.uk. [Last retrieved April 20, 2006].Search in Google Scholar

Ishizaka, A. & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11): 14336–14345.Search in Google Scholar

Izveštaj o javnim nabavkama u Republici Srbiji za period 01.01.2014-30.06.2014.godine, Republika Srbija, Uprava za javne nabavke, Beograd, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Jayant, A., Paul, V. & Kumar, U. (2015). Aplication of Analytic Network Process (ANP) in Business Environment: A Comprehensive Literature Review, IJRMET, 5(1), 29-37.Search in Google Scholar

Kandanala, R., Al-Hussein, M. & Vanderstar, A. (2005). Automation of pre-bidding process for construction projects. Cost Engineering, 147(6), 30–34.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, K.C., Hu, T., Ng, S.T., Skitmore, M. & Cheung, S.O. (2001). A fuzzy neural network approach for contractor prequalification. Construction Management & Economics, 19(2), 175–188.10.1080/01446190150505108Search in Google Scholar

Laver, J. & Larsberger, O. (2011). The Art of identifying „The Most Economically Advantageous Tender” – the Use of Relative Evaluation Models in Public and Utilities Procurement, Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd., www.whoswholegal.com.Search in Google Scholar

Mahdi, I.M., Riley, M.J., Fereig, S.M. & Alex, A.P. (2002). A multi-criteria approach to contractor selection. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(1), 29–37.Search in Google Scholar

Minchin, Jr. R.E. & Smith, G.R. (2005). Quality-based contractor rating model for qualification and bidding purposes. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21(1), 38–43.10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:1(38)Search in Google Scholar

Mitkus, S. & Trinkuniene, E. (2008). Reasoned decisions in construction contracts evaluation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(3), 402–416.10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.402-416Search in Google Scholar

Molenaar, K. R. & Johnson, D. E. (2003). Engineering the procurement phase to achieve the best value. Leadership & Management in Engineering, 3(3), 137–141.10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:3(137)Search in Google Scholar

Ng, S. T. & Skitmore, R. M. (1999). Client and consultant perspectives of prequalification criteria. Building and Environment, 34(5), 607–621.10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00050-XSearch in Google Scholar

Nikolovová, P., Palguta, J. & Pertold, F. (2012). Public Contracts in the Czech Republic. What the Data Say on Behaviour of Contracting Authorities? Veřejné zakázky v ČR: Co říkají data o chování zadavatelů?. Cerge EI. [Online] 6. [Citace: 10. May 2013.] http://idea.cerge-ei.cz/docu.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, A. & Gutierrez, G. (2005). Simple probability models for project contracting. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(2), 329–33810.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.005Search in Google Scholar

Plenkiewicz, E. (2009). Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(4), 377–385Search in Google Scholar

Russell, J.S. & Skibniewski M. (1987). A structured approach to the contractor prequalification process in the USA. CIB-SBI Fourth Int.Sym. on Building Economics, Session D:240-51. Danish Building Research Copenhagen, Denmark.Search in Google Scholar

Russel, J.S. (1991). Contractor failure: analysis. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 5(3), 163-180.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1991)5:3(163)Search in Google Scholar

Russell, J. S., Hancher, D. E. & Skibniewski, M. J. (1992). Contractor prequalification data for construction owners. Construction Management & Economics, 10(2), 117–135.10.1080/01446199200000012Search in Google Scholar

Saaty, T. L., (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804Search in Google Scholar

Saaty, T. L. & Kearns P. K. (1985). Analytical planning, The Organization of Systems, The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. IV, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Saaty, T. L., (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process, Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Saaty, T. (2010). Economic forecasting with tangible and intagible criteria: the analytic hierarchy process of measurement and its validation, Economic Horizons, 1, 5-45.Search in Google Scholar

Saaty T.L. & Peniwati K. (2008). Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Shen, L. Y., Lu, W., Shen, Q. & Li, H. (2003). A computer-aided decision support system for assessing a contractor’s competitiveness. Automation in Construction, 12(5), 577–587.10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00020-7Search in Google Scholar

Sipahi, S. Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775 – 80810.1108/00251741011043920Search in Google Scholar

Skibniewski, M., & Chao, L. (1992). Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 118, 255–261.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(577)Search in Google Scholar

Strand, I., Ramada, P. & Canton, E. (2011). Public procurement in Europe, Cost and effectiveness, A study on procurement regulation. Prepared for the European Commission, March 2011, London Economics, ECORYS.Search in Google Scholar

Topcu, Y. I. (2004). A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey. Building and Environment, 39(4), 469–481.10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.009Search in Google Scholar

Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(2), 224–239.10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.224-239Search in Google Scholar

Vaidya, O.S & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications, European Journal Of Operational Research, Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 169(1), 1-29.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028Search in Google Scholar

Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D. & Harris, P. (2001). Multi-criteria selection or lowest price? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender evaluation preferences. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 8(4), 257–271.Search in Google Scholar

Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D. & Cooper, P. A. (2000). Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender selection process. Construction Management & Economics, 18(7), 767–774.10.1080/014461900433050Search in Google Scholar

Voulgaridou, D., Kirytopoulos K.E. & Leopoulos, V. (2009). An Analytic Network Process Approach for sales forecasting, Operations Research International Journal 9, 35-53.10.1007/s12351-008-0026-2Search in Google Scholar

Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. & Banaitiene, N. (2001). Multi-criteria analysis of a building life cycle. Vilnius: Technika, 380 p. (in Lithuanian).Search in Google Scholar

http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-532/06Search in Google Scholar

http://www.loc.gov/law/help/govt-procurement-law/eu.phpSearch in Google Scholar