<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The vagueness of the concept of ‘sustainable development’ ceased to serve as a consensus platform and instead became a source of controversy. Therefore an instrument is needed to measure whether we are striving towards sustainable development or not. Today the most widely used indicator of economic prosperity is gross domestic product (GDP). It is often incorrectly interpreted as an indicator of quality of life. If, however, GDP is considered to be quality-of-life indicator, it is a misleading indicator as GDP does not cover the services people conduct outside the official market. As a result, environmentalists together with economists have long been cooperating in designing an alternative indicator capable of better capturing the development of society. Even though GDP is good for measuring economic performance, it is highly misleading as an indicator of the quality and sustainability of life. This article describes briefly the most relevant alternative indicators to GDP developed during last two decades including Czech and Slovak methodology of the Quality and Sustainability of Life Index.</p></abstract>

The vagueness of the concept of ‘sustainable development’ ceased to serve as a consensus platform and instead became a source of controversy. Therefore an instrument is needed to measure whether we are striving towards sustainable development or not. Today the most widely used indicator of economic prosperity is gross domestic product (GDP). It is often incorrectly interpreted as an indicator of quality of life. If, however, GDP is considered to be quality-of-life indicator, it is a misleading indicator as GDP does not cover the services people conduct outside the official market. As a result, environmentalists together with economists have long been cooperating in designing an alternative indicator capable of better capturing the development of society. Even though GDP is good for measuring economic performance, it is highly misleading as an indicator of the quality and sustainability of life. This article describes briefly the most relevant alternative indicators to GDP developed during last two decades including Czech and Slovak methodology of the Quality and Sustainability of Life Index.

How to Measure Progress Towards Quality and Sustainability of Life?

Department of Development Studies, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic

Constantine the Philosopher University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Andreja Hlinku 1, 949 74 Nitra, Slovak Republic

Ekológia (Bratislava)

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"How to Measure Progress Towards Quality and Sustainability of Life?"}

The vagueness of the concept of ‘sustainable development’ ceased to serve as a consensus platform and instead became a source of controversy. Therefore an...

How to Measure Progress Towards Quality and Sustainability of Life?

Data publikacji: 01 mar 2015

Zakres stron: 7 - 18

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2015-0002

Słowa kluczowe
indicators, alternatives to GDP, sustainability, quality of life

© 2015 Pavel Nováček and Peter Mederly

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

How to Measure Progress Towards Quality and Sustainability of Life?

Data publikacji: 01 mar 2015

Zakres stron: 7 - 18

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2015-0002

Słowa kluczoweindicators, alternatives to GDP, sustainability, quality of life

© 2015 Pavel Nováček and Peter Mederly

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
indicators, alternatives to GDP, sustainability, quality of life