[Allain, Y. (2006). New European Directives on Public Procurement: Change or Continuity. Public Contract Law Journal, 35(3), 517–536.]Search in Google Scholar
[Amann, M., Essig, M. (2015). Public procurement of innovation: empirical evidence from EU public authorities on barriers for the promotion of innovation. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 282–292.10.1080/13511610.2014.998641]Search in Google Scholar
[Arrowsmith, S. (2011). The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement (3. ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergman, M. A. and Lundberg, S. 2013. Tender evaluation and supplier selection methods in public procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 73–83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovis, C. (2006). The New Public Procurement Legal Framework. European Public Law, 12(1), 73–109.10.54648/EURO2006005]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovis H. Ch. (2007). EU Public Procurement Law. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csorba, C. (2013). Čím se řídí prokazování kvalifikace dodavatelů z EU v zadávacím řízení. Právní rádce, 21(1), 64–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dale-Clough, L. (2015). Public procurement of innovation and local authority procurement: procurement modes and framework conditions in three European cities. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 220–242.10.1080/13511610.2015.1012709]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, P., Brady, O. (2015). Are government intentions for the inclusion of innovation and small and medium enterprises participation in public procurement being delivered or ignored? An Irish case study. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 324–343.10.1080/13511610.2014.985192]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2011). Internal Procurement market. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/docs/modernising_rules/public-procurement-indicators-2011_en.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Flynn, A., McKevitt, D., Davis, P. (2015). The impact of size on small and medium-sized enterprise public sector tendering. International Small Business Journal, 33(4), 443–461.10.1177/0266242613503178]Search in Google Scholar
[Graells, A. S. (2011). Public procurement and the EU competition rules. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grandia, J., Steijn, B., Kuipers, B. (2015). It is not easy being green: increasing sustainable public procurement behaviour. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 243–260.10.1080/13511610.2015.1024639]Search in Google Scholar
[Guccio, C., Pignatoro, G. and Rizzo, I. (2014). Evaluating the efficiency of public procurement contracts for cultural heritage conservation works in Italy: examining the use of locality in public procurement. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(1), 43–70.10.1007/s10824-012-9194-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Journal of the European Union. (2015). Judgment of the Court of 15 January 1998. Mannesmann Anlagenbau Austria AG a další proti Strohal Rotationsdruck GesmbH. Case C-44/96. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from EUR-Lex [Legal Information System].]Search in Google Scholar
[Jurčík, R. (2007). Zadávání veřejných zakázek a udělování koncesí v ČR a EU. Praha: C. H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jurčík, R. (2012). Zákon o veřejných zakázkách, Komentář (3. Ed.). Praha: C. H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruták T., Krutáková, L. (2013). Zákon o veřejných zakázkách s komentářem s příklady. Praha: ANAG.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loader, K., Norton, S. (2015). SME access to public procurement: An analysis of the experiences of SMEs supplying the publicly funded UK heritage sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(4), 241–250.10.1016/j.pursup.2015.02.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Moretti, L., Valbonesi, P. (2015). Firms’ Qualifications and Subcontracting in Public Procurement: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 31(3), 568–598.10.1093/jleo/ewv001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ochrana, F. (2008). Zadávání, hodnocení a kontrola veřejných zakázek: (ekonomická analýza). Praha: Ekopress.]Search in Google Scholar
[Official Journal of the European Union. (2015). Judgment of the Court of 10 February 1982. SA Transporoute et travaux proti Ministère des travaux publics. Case 76/81. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from EUR-Lex [Legal Information System].]Search in Google Scholar
[Official Journal of the European Union. (2015). Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 1987. – SA Constructions et entreprises industrielles (CEI) and others v Société coopérative “Association intercommunale pour les autoroutes des Ardennes” and others. – References for a preliminary ruling: Conseil d’Etat – Belgium. – Procedure for the award of public works contracts – Determination of the constructor’s financial and economic standing. Joined cases 27/86, 28/86 and 29/86. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from EURLex [Legal Information System].]Search in Google Scholar
[Official Journal of the European Union. (2015). Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber, extended composition) of 21 September 2005. Gesellschaft für Abfallentsorgungs-Technik GmbH (GAT) proti Österreichische Autobahnen und Schnellstraßen AG (ÖSAG). Case C-315/01. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from EUR-Lex [Legal Information System].]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavel, J. (2007). Ekonomické aspekty veřejných zakázek. Praha: Nakladatelství Oeconomica.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raus, D. (2011). Zadávání veřejných zakázek: judikatura s komentářem. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raus, D., Neruda, R. (2007). Zákon o veřejných zakázkách, Komentář. Praha: Linde.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ross, T. W., Yan, J. (2015). Comparing Public – Private Partnerships and Traditional Public Procurement: Efficiency vs. Flexibility. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 17(5), 448–466.10.1080/13876988.2015.1029333]Search in Google Scholar
[Siemiatycki, M. (2015). Public – Private Partnerships in Canada: Reflections on twenty years of practice. Canadian Public Administration, 58(3), 343–362.10.1111/capa.12119]Search in Google Scholar
[Sinani, B., Shanto K. (2013). Methods and Functions of Comparative Law. Juridica, 9(2), 25–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suliantoro, H., Ghozali, I., Wibowo, M. A. (2015). E-Procurement adoption in government institution: Predicting social values effect on intention and usage behaviour of e-procurement. International Journal of Business and Society, 16(2), 167–184.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šebesta, M., Podešva, V., Olík, M. and Machurek, T. (2006). Zákon o veřejných zakázkách s komentářem. Praha: ASPI.]Search in Google Scholar
[Testa, F., Annunziata, E., Iraldo, F., Frey, M. (2016). Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: an effective tool for sustainable production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1893–1900.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.092]Search in Google Scholar
[The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2015). Manuál pro zápis do seznamu kvalifikovaných dodavatelů Ministerstva pro místní rozvoj (Manual for the registration in the list of qualified suppliers of The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic). Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://portal-vz.cz/cs/Jak-na-zadavani-verejnych-zakazek/Metodiky-stanoviska.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2015). Metodika Ministerstva pro místní rozvoj pro zadávání veřejných zakázek (Methodology of the Ministry of Regional Development for public procurement). Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://portal-vz.cz/cs/Jak-na-zadavani-verejnych-zakazek/Metodiky-stanoviska.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2015). Annual Report on Public Tenders in the CR. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from: http://www.portal-vz.cz/getmedia/8965ea38-8a96-490b-ad0f-ce4e1c0a32c9/Vyrocni-zprava-o-stavu-verejnych-zakazek-za-rok-2013.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2015). Informační systém o veřejných zakázkách. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.isvz.cz/ISVZ/Podpora/ISVZ_open_data_vz.aspx.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Office Of The Protection Of Competition. (2015). Decision of The Office Of The Protection Of Competition of 25 February 2013, e. n. S229/2012/VZ-3516/2013/512/MVy. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.uohs.cz/cs/verejne-zakazky/sbirky-rozhodnuti/detail-10279.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Office Of The Protection Of Competition. (2015). Decision of The Office Of The Protection Of Competition of 15.8.2013, e. n. ÚOHS-S151/2013/VZ-15420/2013/521/VCe. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from https://www.uohs.cz/cs/verejne-zakazky/sbirky-rozhodnuti/detail-10678.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolters Kluwer ČR, a.s. (2015). Judgment of the Regional Court in Brno of 10 March 2011, e. n. 62Ca 15/2009 – 71. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from ASPI [Legal Information System].]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolters Kluwer ČR, a.s. (2015). Judgment of the Regional Court in Brno of 7 April, e. n. 62 Ca 13/2009 – 67. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from ASPI [Legal Information System].]Search in Google Scholar