From Big Bang to Big Gap? Potential Links Between Agency-Communion Orientation and Perception of Creativity in Computer Science

Abele, A. E. (2003). The Dynamics of Masculine-Agentic and Feminine-Communal Traits: Findings from a Prospective Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768-776.10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768Search in Google Scholar

Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751Search in Google Scholar

Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic contents in social cognition: A Dual Perspective Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195-255.10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75-105.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Bi, C., Ybarra, O., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Accentuating your masculine side. Agentic traits generally dominate self-evaluation, even in China. Social Psychology,44, 104-109.10.1027/1864-9335/a000144Search in Google Scholar

Bianco, M., Harris, B., Garrison-Wade, D., & Leech, N. (2011). Gifted girls: Gender bias in gifted referrals. Roeper Review, 33, 170-181.10.1080/02783193.2011.580500Search in Google Scholar

Bush, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.10.2190/H7E1-XMM7-GU9B-3HWRSearch in Google Scholar

Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes About Gender and Science: Women ≠ Scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40,1-17.10.1177/0361684315622645Search in Google Scholar

Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (Cuse) Scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 133-153.10.2190/JGJR-0KVL-HRF7-GCNVSearch in Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045-1060.10.1037/a0016239Search in Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles, 69, 58-71.10.1007/s11199-013-0296-xSearch in Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzof, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,1-8.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049Search in Google Scholar

Chua, S. L., Chen, D., & Wong, A. F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A metaanalysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 609-623.10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00039-4Search in Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B, & Goodfriend, W. (2006). Rolling with the Changes: A Role Congruity Perspective on Gender Norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 369-383.10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00312.xSearch in Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M. & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles: A New Look at Why Women Opt Out of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers. Psychological Science, 2,1051-1057.10.1177/0956797610377342Search in Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Of men, women, and motivation: A role congruity account. In J.Y. Shah & W.L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 434-447). New York: Guilford.Search in Google Scholar

Eagly, A., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from distributions of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735Search in Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19-35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). First judge warmth, then competence: Fundamental social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class, New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21-28.10.1037/a0017863Search in Google Scholar

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students’ gender moderates accuracy of teachers’ ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 290-304.10.1002/jocb.36Search in Google Scholar

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Are Teachers’ Implicit Theories of Creativity Related to the Recognition of Their Students’ Creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 0, 1-17.Search in Google Scholar

Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 269-298). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Search in Google Scholar

Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin,116, 412-428.10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Pumaccahua, T. T., & Holt, R. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising g college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 913-917.10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.013Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindset: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62-70.10.1037/a0034898Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D.M., Gralewski, J., Wiśniewska, E., & Lebuda, I. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity: A latent variables approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 159-166.10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers’ effect on students’ creative self-beliefs is moderated by students’ gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 1-8.10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Kwaśnik, M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Please, Mind the Gap. Gender and Computer Science Education. Journal of Gender and Power, 67-90.Search in Google Scholar

Margolis J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: women in computing. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Search in Google Scholar

Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-76110.1037/0022-3514.66.4.753Search in Google Scholar

Proudfoot, D., Kay, A. C., & Koval, C. Z. (2015). A Gender Bias in the Attribution of Creativity: Archival and Experimental Evidence for the Perceived Association Between Masculinity and Creative Thinking. Psychological Science, 1-11.10.1177/0956797615598739Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 235-297.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60029-5Search in Google Scholar

Saleem, H., Beaudry, A., & Croteau, A. M. (2011). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1922-1936.10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.017Search in Google Scholar

Saunders, D., & Thagard, P. (2005). Creativity in Computer Science. In J.C. Kaufman & J.Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domain: Faces of the muse (pp.153-167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbraum.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, CH., Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Implicit theories of creativity in computer science in the United States and China. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49,137-156.10.1002/jocb.61Search in Google Scholar

Tang, M., Werner, C., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Differences in creative mindset between Germany and Poland: The mediating effect of individualism and collectivism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 31-40.10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in Masculine and Feminine Traits over Time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305-325.10.1007/BF02766650Search in Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M. (2001). Changes in women’s assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133-145.10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.133Search in Google Scholar

Whitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00026-XSearch in Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.10.1080/10463280500229619Search in Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B., & Szlendak, M. (2010). Skale do pomiaru orientacji sprawczej i wspólnotowej [Scales for measuring the agentic and communal orientation]. Psychologia Spoleczna, 5, 57-69.Search in Google Scholar