The Use of the Twitter in Public Benefit Organisations in Poland: How Communicative Function of Tweets Translates Into Audience Reaction?

[1]Act of 24 April, 2003 on Public Benefit and Volunteer Activities (Journal of Laws of 2014, item 1118).Act of 24 April, 2003 on Public Benefit and Volunteer Activities(Journal of Laws of 2014, item 1118)Search in Google Scholar

[2]Bellucci, Marco and Manetti, Giacomo. 2017. “Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 30(4): 874–905.BellucciMarcoManettiGiacomo.2017“Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States”Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal30487490510.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2122Search in Google Scholar

[3]Bortree, Denise and Seltzer, Trent. 2009. “Dialogic strategies and outcomes: an analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles”. Public Relations Review 35: 317–319.BortreeDeniseSeltzerTrent.2009“Dialogic strategies and outcomes: an analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles”Public Relations Review3531731910.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[4]Czetwertyński, Sławomir. 2016. „Konkurencja na rynku jednego procenta”. Społeczeństwo i Ekonomia 1 (5): 69–84.CzetwertyńskiSławomir.2016„Konkurencja na rynku jednego procenta”Społeczeństwo i Ekonomia156984Search in Google Scholar

[5]Database which covers all Polish PBOs - http://www.pozytek.gov.pl/Wykaz,Organizacji,Powszechny,-Publiczny,3666.html (accessed: 20.07.2017).Database which covers all Polish PBOshttp://www.pozytek.gov.pl/Wykaz,Organizacji,Powszechny,-Publiczny,3666.html(accessed: 20.07.2017)Search in Google Scholar

[6]Dhanesh, Ganga. 2017. “Putting engagement in its PRoper place: State of the field, definition and model of engagement in public relations”. Public Relations Review 43: 925–933.DhaneshGanga.2017“Putting engagement in its PRoper place: State of the field, definition and model of engagement in public relations”Public Relations Review4392593310.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[7]Guidry, Jeanine and Saxton, Gregory and Messner Marcus. 2015. “Tweeting Charities Perceptions, Resources, and Effective Twitter Practices for the Nonprofit Sector”. In: Public Relations in the Nonprofit Sector, ed. Richard Waters, New York: Routledge.GuidryJeanineSaxtonGregoryMessnerMarcus.2015“Tweeting Charities Perceptions, Resources, and Effective Twitter Practices for the Nonprofit Sector”Public Relations in the Nonprofit SectorRichardWatersNew YorkRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar

[8]Guo, Chao and Saxton, Gregory. 2014. “Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy”. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43(1): 57–79.GuoChaoSaxtonGregory.2014“Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly431577910.1177/0899764012471585Search in Google Scholar

[9]Hinson, Robert and Van Zyl, Helena and Agbleze, Selorm. 2014.“An interrogation of the dialogic potential of insurance firm websites in Ghana”. Information Development 30(1):59–69.HinsonRobertVan ZylHelenaAgblezeSelorm.2014“An interrogation of the dialogic potential of insurance firm websites in Ghana”Information Development301596910.1177/0266666913477879Search in Google Scholar

[10]Huang, Yu Chao and Lin, Yi-Pin and Saxton, Gregory. 2016. “Give Me a Like: How HIV/AIDS Nonprofit Organizations Can Engage Their Audience on Facebook”. Aids Education and Prevention 28 (6): 539–556.HuangYu ChaoLinYi-PinSaxtonGregory.2016“Give Me a Like: How HIV/AIDS Nonprofit Organizations Can Engage Their Audience on Facebook”Aids Education and Prevention28653955610.1521/aeap.2016.28.6.539Search in Google Scholar

[11]Ingenhoff, Diana and Koelling, Martin. (2009). The potential of Web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOs. Public Relations Review 35: 66–73.IngenhoffDianaKoellingMartin.2009The potential of Web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOsPublic Relations Review35667310.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.023Search in Google Scholar

[12]Kang, Seok and Norton, Hanna. 2004. “Nonprofit organizations’ use of the World Wide Web: are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals?”.Public Relations Review 30: 279–284.KangSeokNortonHanna.2004“Nonprofit organizations’ use of the World Wide Web: are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals?”Public Relations Review3027928410.1016/j.pubrev.2004.04.002Search in Google Scholar

[13]Kenix, Linda. 2007. “In search of utopia: an analysis of nonprofit web pages”. Information, Communication & Society 10(1): 69–94.KenixLinda.2007“In search of utopia: an analysis of nonprofit web pages”Information, Communication & Society101699410.1080/13691180701193085Search in Google Scholar

[14]Ki, Eyun and Hon, Linda. 2007. “Testing the linkages among the organization–public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions”. Journal of Public Relations Research 19(1): 1–23.KiEyunHonLinda.2007“Testing the linkages among the organization–public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions”Journal of Public Relations Research19112310.1080/10627260709336593Search in Google Scholar

[15]Ki, Eyun and Hon, Linda. 2008. “A Measure of Relationship Cultivation Strategies”. Journal of Public Relations Research 21(1):1–24.KiEyunHonLinda.2008“A Measure of Relationship Cultivation Strategies”Journal of Public Relations Research21112410.1080/10627260802520488Search in Google Scholar

[16]Lovejoy, Kristen and Waters, Richard and Saxton, Gregory. 2012. “Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less”. Public Relations Review 38: 313– 318.LovejoyKristenWatersRichardSaxtonGregory.2012“Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less”Public Relations Review38313– 31810.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005Search in Google Scholar

[17]Lovejoy, Kristen and Saxton, Gregory. 2012. “Information, community and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(3): 337–353.LovejoyKristenSaxtonGregory.2012“Information, community and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17333735310.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.xSearch in Google Scholar

[18]Madichie, Nnamdi and Hinson, Robert. 2014. “A critical analysis of the “dialogic communication” potential of sub-Saharan African Police Service websites”. Public Relations Review No. 40:338–350.MadichieNnamdiHinsonRobert.2014“A critical analysis of the “dialogic communication” potential of sub-Saharan African Police Service websites”Public Relations ReviewNo4033835010.1016/j.pubrev.2013.10.009Search in Google Scholar

[19]Messner, Marcus and Jin, Yean and Medina-Messner, Vivian and Meganck, Shana and Quarforth Scott and Norton, Sally. 2013. “140 characters for better health: An exploration of the Twitter engagement of leading nonprofit organizations”. In: Social media and strategic communications, ed. Hana S. Noor Al- Deen and John Allen Hendricks, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.MessnerMarcusJinYeanMedina-MessnerVivianMeganckShanaQuarforthScottNortonSally.2013“140 characters for better health: An exploration of the Twitter engagement of leading nonprofit organizations”Social media and strategic communicationsHanaSNoor Al- Deen and John Allen HendricksBasingstoke, UKPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/9781137287052_7Search in Google Scholar

[20]Nah, Seungahn and Saxton, Gregory. 2013. “Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations”, New Media and Society Vol. 15 No. 2: 294–313.NahSeungahnSaxtonGregory.2013“Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations”New Media and SocietyVol. 15No. 229431310.1177/1461444812452411Search in Google Scholar

[21]“Number of monthly active Twitter users worldwide from 1st quarter 2010 to 1st quarter 2018”https://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-active-twitter-users (accessed: 16.07.2018).“Number of monthly active Twitter users worldwide from 1st quarter 2010 to 1st quarter 2018.”https://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-active-twitter-users(accessed: 16.07.2018)Search in Google Scholar

[22]Naudé, Annelie and Froneman, Johannes and Atwood, Roy. 2004. “The use of the Internet by ten South African non-governmental organizations—a public relations perspective”. Public Relations Review 30: 87–94.NaudéAnnelieFronemanJohannesAtwoodRoy2004“The use of the Internet by ten South African non-governmental organizations—a public relations perspective”Public Relations Review30879410.1016/j.pubrev.2003.11.008Search in Google Scholar

[23]Oliński, Marian and Szamrowski, Piotr.2018. „Znaczenie mediów społecznościowych w funkcjonowaniu Organizacji Pożytku Publicznego”, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Seria: Organizacja i Zarządzanie117: 122–138.OlińskiMarianSzamrowskiPiotr2018„Znaczenie mediów społecznościowych w funkcjonowaniu Organizacji Pożytku Publicznego”Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Seria: Organizacja i Zarządzanie11712213810.29119/1641-3466.2018.117.23Search in Google Scholar

[24]Saxton, Gregory and Guo, Chao. 2011. “Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations”. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(2): 270–295.SaxtonGregoryGuoChao.2011“Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly40227029510.1177/0899764009341086Search in Google Scholar

[25]Saxton, Gregory and Waters, Richard. 2014. “What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community building messages”. Journal of Public Relations Research 26(3): 280–299.SaxtonGregoryWatersRichard.2014“What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community building messages”Journal of Public Relations Research26328029910.1080/1062726X.2014.908721Search in Google Scholar

[26]Tripathi, Siddharth and Verma, Sanjeev. 2018. “Social media, an emerging platform for relationship building: A study of engagement with nongovernment organizations in India”. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 23(1): 1–11.TripathiSiddharthVermaSanjeev.2018“Social media, an emerging platform for relationship building: A study of engagement with nongovernment organizations in India”International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing23111110.1002/nvsm.1589Search in Google Scholar

[27]Urbaniak, Geoffrey and Plous, Scott. 2013. “Research Randomizer, (Version 4.0)”. http://www.randomizer.org(accessed: 20.02.2018).UrbaniakGeoffreyPlousScott.2013“Research Randomizer, (Version 4.0)”http://www.randomizer.org(accessed: 20.02.2018)Search in Google Scholar

[28]Uzunoglu, Ebru and Kip, Sema. 2014. “Building relationships through websites: A content analysis of Turkish environmental non-profit organization’s (NPO) websites”. Public Relations Review No. 40:113–115.UzunogluEbruKipSema.2014“Building relationships through websites: A content analysis of Turkish environmental non-profit organization’s (NPO) websites”Public Relations Review4011311510.1016/j.pubrev.2013.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[29]Van Wissen, Nadine and Wonneberger, Anke. 2017. “Building Stakeholder Relations Online: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Dialogic and Relational Maintenance Strategies on Facebook”. Communication Management Review 2(1):54–74.Van WissenNadineWonnebergerAnke2017“Building Stakeholder Relations Online: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Dialogic and Relational Maintenance Strategies on Facebook”Communication Management Review21547410.22522/cmr20170119Search in Google Scholar

[30]Waters, Richard. 2008. “Applying Relationship Management Theory to the Fundraising Process for Individual Donors”. Journal of Communication Management 12(1): 73–87.WatersRichard.2008“Applying Relationship Management Theory to the Fundraising Process for Individual Donors”Journal of Communication Management121738710.1108/13632540810854244Search in Google Scholar

[31]Waters, Richard. 2009. “The Importance of Understanding Donor Preference and Relationship Cultivation Strategies”. Journal of Nonprofit& Public Sector Marketing 21: 327–346.WatersRichard.2009“The Importance of Understanding Donor Preference and Relationship Cultivation Strategies”Journal of Nonprofit& Public Sector Marketing2132734610.1080/10495140802662523Search in Google Scholar

[32]Young, James. 2012. The current status of social media use among nonprofit human service organizations: An exploratory study. Doctoral dissertation Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.YoungJames.2012The current status of social media use among nonprofit human service organizations: An exploratory study. Doctoral dissertationRichmondVirginia Commonwealth UniversitySearch in Google Scholar